Sign upLogin

whylabs/whylogs-python

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 3,918 of 3,918 total issues

Function merge has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def merge(self, other: "EmbeddingMetric") -> "EmbeddingMetric":
        if self.references.value.shape != other.references.value.shape:
            if other.references.value.shape == (1, 1):
                # TODO: handle merging with other.serialize_references==False better
                # The (1, 1) shape indicates the other metric was created without a reference matrix.
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/experimental/extras/embedding_metric.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function calculate has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def calculate(
        self, target_column_view: ColumnProfileView, reference_column_view: ColumnProfileView, with_thresholds=False
    ) -> Optional[DriftAlgorithmScore]:
        """Calculates drift score for a given column.
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/viz/drift/column_drift_algorithms.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _convert_to_int_if_bool has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def _convert_to_int_if_bool(data: pd.core.frame.DataFrame, *columns: str) -> pd.core.frame.DataFrame:
    for col in columns:
        if all(isinstance(x, bool) for x in data[col]):
            data[col] = data[col].apply(lambda x: 1 if x else 0)
    return data
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/experimental/api/logger/__init__.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _write_segmented_result_set has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _write_segmented_result_set(self, file: SegmentedResultSet, **kwargs: Any) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
        views = file.get_writables()
        if not views:
            logger.warning("Attempt to write a result set with no writables, nothing written!")
            return True, ""
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/api/writer/whylabs_transaction_writer.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get(name: str, writable: Optional[_Writable] = None, **kwargs) -> Union[Writer, WriterWrapper]:
        if name == "local":
            from whylogs.api.writer.local import LocalWriter

            writer = LocalWriter(**kwargs)  # type: ignore
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/api/writer/writer.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function __post_init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __post_init__(self):
        if self.column_name and self.column_type:
            logger.warning(f"ResolverSpec: column {self.column_name} also specified type, name takes precedence")
        if not (self.column_name or self.column_type):
            raise ValueError("ResolverSpec: resolver specification must supply name or type")
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/resolvers.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_cardinality_estimate has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_cardinality_estimate(column_profile: ColumnProfileView) -> CardinalityEstimate:
    cardinality = column_profile.get_metric("cardinality")
    counts = column_profile.get_metric("counts")
    est_value: Optional[float] = None
    est_ratio: Optional[float] = None
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/utils/stats_calculations.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function resolve has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def resolve(
        self,
        *,
        pandas: Optional[pd.DataFrame] = None,
        row: Optional[Mapping[str, Any]] = None,
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/schema.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _do_match has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _do_match(cls, dtype_or_type: Any, maybe_type: Optional[Any]) -> bool:
        # Pandas Categorical is Strings
        if CategoricalDtype is not None and isinstance(dtype_or_type, CategoricalDtype):
            return True
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/datatypes.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _write has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _write(
        self, path: Optional[str] = None, filename: Optional[str] = None, **kwargs: Any
    ) -> Tuple[bool, Union[str, List[str]]]:
        file_to_write = kwargs.get("file")
        if file_to_write is None:
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/view/dataset_profile_view.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function to_summary_dict has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def to_summary_dict(self, cfg: Optional[SummaryConfig] = None) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        cfg = cfg or SummaryConfig()
        summary = {}
        for sub_name, metrics in self.submetrics.items():
            for namespace, metric in metrics.items():
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/metrics/multimetric.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function to_protobuf has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def to_protobuf(
        self,
    ) -> ModelProfileMessage:
        model_type = ModelType.UNKNOWN
        if not self.model_type:
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/model_performance_metrics/model_performance_metrics.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  Integral {
    @Override
    public HashSet<Type> getTypes() {
      HashSet<Type> types = new HashSet();
      types.add(Long.class);
Severity: Minor
Found in java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/DataTypes.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/DataTypes.java on lines 37..50

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function merge_submetrics has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def merge_submetrics(self: MULTI_METRIC, other: MULTI_METRIC) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, Metric]]:
        if self.namespace != other.namespace:
            raise ValueError(f"Attempt to merge MultiMetrics {self.namespace} and {other.namespace}")

        submetric_names = set(self.submetrics.keys())
Severity: Minor
Found in python/whylogs/core/metrics/multimetric.py - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  Fractional {
    @Override
    public HashSet<Type> getTypes() {
      HashSet<Type> types = new HashSet();
      types.add(Double.class);
Severity: Minor
Found in java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/DataTypes.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/DataTypes.java on lines 23..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  public static MaxIntegralComponent max(Collection<? extends Integer> list) {
    int max = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
    for (Integer i : list) {
      max = Integer.max(max, i);
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/metrics/components/MaxIntegralComponent.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/metrics/components/MinIntegralComponent.java on lines 35..41

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  public static MinIntegralComponent min(Collection<? extends Integer> list) {
    int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    for (Integer i : list) {
      min = Integer.min(min, i);
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/metrics/components/MinIntegralComponent.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/metrics/components/MaxIntegralComponent.java on lines 25..31

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 44.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

      return (T) result;
Severity: Major
Found in java/core/src/main/java/com/whylogs/core/metrics/aggregators/NumberSumAggregator.java - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this function.
    Open

        return _get_column_names(x.view())
    Severity: Major
    Found in python/whylogs/api/writer/whylabs_client.py - About 30 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this function.
      Open

                  return set()
      Severity: Major
      Found in python/whylogs/api/writer/whylabs_client.py - About 30 mins to fix
        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language