Showing 3,918 of 3,918 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if _is_nan(val):
evaluations.append((pandas[col].isna()))
else:
evaluations.append((pandas[col] == val))
mask = reduce(lambda x, y: x & y, evaluations)
Function _log_segment
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _log_segment(
partition: SegmentationPartition,
schema: DatasetSchema,
obj: Any = None,
pandas: Optional[pd.DataFrame] = None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function calc_non_numeric_relevance
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calc_non_numeric_relevance(self, row_dict: pd.core.series.Series) -> Tuple[List[int], List[int]]:
prediction_relevance = []
ideal_relevance = []
for target_val in row_dict[self.prediction_column]:
ideal_relevance.append(1 if target_val in row_dict[self.target_column] else 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _load_or_prompt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _load_or_prompt(
self,
env_name: EnvVariableName,
config_name: ConfigVariableName,
persist: bool = False,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function log_debug_event
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def log_debug_event(
self,
debug_event: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
*,
trace_id: str,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(
self,
aggregate_by: TimeGranularity = TimeGranularity.Hour,
write_schedule: Optional[Schedule] = Schedule(cadence=TimeGranularity.Minute, interval=10),
schema: Optional[DatasetSchema] = None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _segmented_performance_metrics
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _segmented_performance_metrics(
log_full_data: bool,
schema: DatasetSchema,
data: pd.DataFrame,
performance_column_mapping: Dict[str, Optional[str]],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if spec.metric.get_namespace() in result:
logger.warning(
f"Conflicting resolvers for {spec.metric.get_namespace()} metric in column '{name}' of type {why_type.return_type.__name__}"
)
result[spec.metric.get_namespace()] = spec.metric.zero(cfg)
Function write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(
self,
file: _Writable,
dest: Optional[str] = None,
**kwargs: Any,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(
self,
file: _Writable,
dest: Optional[str] = None, # TODO: this should be used as object_name
**kwargs: Any,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function columnar_update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def columnar_update(self, data: PreprocessedColumn) -> OperationResult:
# Should be data.list.objs [ List[str] ] from scalar
# data.pandas.obj Series[List[str]] from apply
doc_lengths = list()
if data.list.objs and isinstance(data.list.objs[0], list) and _all_strings(data.list.objs[0]):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function segment_processing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def segment_processing(
schema: DatasetSchema,
obj: Any = None,
pandas: Optional[pd.DataFrame] = None,
row: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_time_tuple
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_time_tuple(self) -> time.struct_time:
if self.utc:
time_tuple = time.gmtime(self._current_batch_timestamp)
else:
time_tuple = time.localtime(self._current_batch_timestamp)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function initialize_logger
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_logger() -> None:
# Initialize session
n_attempts = 3
while n_attempts > 0:
# Initialize logger
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function column_is_nullable_datatype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_is_nullable_datatype(column_name: str, datatype: str) -> MetricConstraint:
"""Check if column contains only records of specific datatype.
Datatypes can be: integral, fractional, boolean, string, object.
Returns True if there is at least one record of type datatype and there is no records of remaining types.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function relation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def relation(op: Relation, value: Union[str, int, float]) -> Callable[[Any], bool]: # type: ignore
if op == Relation.match: # type: ignore
return lambda x: re.compile(value).match(x) # type: ignore
if op == Relation.fullmatch: # type: ignore
return lambda x: re.compile(value).fullmatch(x) # type: ignore
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if validate_with_row_id:
action(self.name, cond_name, x, identity_list[index]) # type: ignore
else:
action(self.name, cond_name, x) # type: ignore
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if isinstance(arr, pd.Series):
first = welford_online_variance_m2(existing=first, new_value=arr.iloc[0])
else:
first = welford_online_variance_m2(existing=first, new_value=arr[0])
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$closeIcon.on("click", function () {
$signUpText.addClass("d-none");
sidebarContentHeight()
$(".open-sign-up-text-notif-container").removeClass("d-none")
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$openSignUpText.on("click", function () {
$signUpText.removeClass("d-none");
sidebarContentHeight()
$(".open-sign-up-text-notif-container").addClass("d-none")
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76