Showing 3,906 of 3,906 total issues
Function _histogram_from_sketch has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _histogram_from_sketch(
sketch: kll_doubles_sketch,
max_buckets: Optional[int] = None,
avg_per_bucket: Optional[float] = None,
min_n_buckets: Optional[int] = None,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function relevant_counter has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def relevant_counter(self, row: pd.core.series.Series, k: int) -> int:
if self.convert_non_numeric:
return sum(
[1 if pred_val in row[self.target_column] else 0 for pred_val in row[self.prediction_column][:k]]
)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolve has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve(self, name: str, why_type: DataType, fi_disabled: bool = False) -> Dict[str, Metric]:
metrics: Dict[str, Metric] = {
"counts": StandardMetric.counts.zero(MetricConfig()),
"types": StandardMetric.types.zero(MetricConfig()),
"cardinality": StandardMetric.cardinality.zero(MetricConfig()),- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _validate_timestamp has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _validate_timestamp(timestamp: Union[date, datetime, pd.Timestamp, str]) -> datetime:
if isinstance(timestamp, pd.Timestamp):
return timestamp.to_pydatetime()
if isinstance(timestamp, str):
try:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_batch has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_batch(self, batch: List[LoggerMessage], batch_type: Type[LoggerMessage]) -> None:
if batch_type == TrackMessage:
self._process_track_messages(cast(List[TrackMessage], batch))
elif batch_type == FlushMessage:
self._process_flush_messages(cast(List[FlushMessage], batch))- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function truncate_time_ms has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def truncate_time_ms(t: int, granularity: TimeGranularity) -> int:
dt = datetime.fromtimestamp(t / 1000, tz=tz.tzutc()).replace(second=0, microsecond=0)
if granularity == TimeGranularity.Minute:
trunc = dt- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function to_protobuf has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_protobuf(self) -> MetricMessage:
msg = {}
for sub_name, metrics in self.submetrics.items():
for namespace, metric in metrics.items():
sub_msg = metric.to_protobuf()- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _do_write has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _do_write(self, out_f: BinaryIO, **kwargs: Any) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
if kwargs.get("use_v0") or self.profile_view.model_performance_metrics:
if self.profile_view.model_performance_metrics:
logger.info("Converting segmented profile with performance metrics to v0 format before writing.")
else:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _do_submetric_merge has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _do_submetric_merge(lhs: Dict[str, Metric], rhs: Dict[str, Metric]) -> Dict[str, Metric]:
namespaces = set(lhs.keys())
namespaces.update(rhs.keys())
result: Dict[str, Metric] = {}
for namespace in namespaces:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function len has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def len(self) -> int:
length = 0
if self.ints is not None:
length += len(self.ints)
if self.floats is not None:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _merge_CM has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _merge_CM(old_conf_matrix: ConfusionMatrix, new_conf_matrix: ConfusionMatrix):
"""
Merges two confusion_matrix since distinc or overlaping labels
Args:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function to_protobuf has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_protobuf(self) -> ColumnMessage:
res: Dict[str, MetricComponentMessage] = {}
for m_name, m in self._metrics.items():
for mc_name, mc in m.to_protobuf().metric_components.items():
if not m.exclude_from_serialization:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function column_has_non_zero_types has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_has_non_zero_types(column_name: str, types_list: List[str]) -> MetricConstraint:
def has_non_zero_types(x) -> bool:
types_dict = x.to_summary_dict()
for key in types_dict.keys():
if key in types_list and types_dict[key] == 0:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply(self, profile: DatasetProfileView) -> List[Metric]:
if self.metrics_resolver is not None:
custom_result = self.metrics_resolver(profile)
if isinstance(custom_result, List):
return custom_result- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Line length Open
- **Set up a release workflow.** Here's an example release workflow, controlled by Git tags:- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Line length Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Line length Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Line length Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Line length Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD013 - Line length
Tags: line_length
Aliases: line-length Parameters: linelength, codeblocks, tables (number; default 80, boolean; default true)
This rule is triggered when there are lines that are longer than the configured line length (default: 80 characters). To fix this, split the line up into multiple lines.
This rule has an exception where there is no whitespace beyond the configured line length. This allows you to still include items such as long URLs without being forced to break them in the middle.
You also have the option to exclude this rule for code blocks and tables. To
do this, set the code_blocks and/or tables parameters to false.
Code blocks are included in this rule by default since it is often a requirement for document readability, and tentatively compatible with code rules. Still, some languages do not lend themselves to short lines.
Ordered list item prefix Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MD029 - Ordered list item prefix
Tags: ol
Aliases: ol-prefix
Parameters: style ("one", "ordered"; default "one")
This rule is triggered on ordered lists that do not either start with '1.' or do not have a prefix that increases in numerical order (depending on the configured style, which defaults to 'one').
Example valid list if the style is configured as 'one':
1. Do this.
1. Do that.
1. Done.Example valid list if the style is configured as 'ordered':
1. Do this.
2. Do that.
3. Done.