File WatchedItemQueryService.php
has 571 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace MediaWiki\Watchlist;
use ChangeTags;
Method getWatchedItemsWithRecentChangeInfo
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getWatchedItemsWithRecentChangeInfo(
User $user, array $options = [], &$startFrom = null
) {
$options += [
'includeFields' => [],
Function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFilterConds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFilterConds(
IReadableDatabase $dbr,
User $user,
array $options
) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFields
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFields( array $options ) {
$fields = [
'rc_id',
'rc_namespace',
'rc_title',
Method getWatchedItemsForUser
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getWatchedItemsForUser( UserIdentity $user, array $options = [] ) {
if ( !$user->isRegistered() ) {
// TODO: should this just return an empty array or rather complain loud at this point
// as e.g. ApiBase::getWatchlistUser does?
return [];
Method getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFilterConds
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFilterConds(
IReadableDatabase $dbr,
User $user,
array $options
) {
Function getWatchedItemsWithRecentChangeInfo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getWatchedItemsWithRecentChangeInfo(
User $user, array $options = [], &$startFrom = null
) {
$options += [
'includeFields' => [],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryFields( array $options ) {
$fields = [
'rc_id',
'rc_namespace',
'rc_title',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryConds
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryConds(
IReadableDatabase $db,
User $user,
array $options
) {
Method getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryJoinConds
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryJoinConds( array $options ) {
$joinConds = [
'watchlist' => [ 'JOIN',
[
'wl_namespace=rc_namespace',
Method __construct
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
IConnectionProvider $dbProvider,
CommentStore $commentStore,
WatchedItemStoreInterface $watchedItemStore,
HookContainer $hookContainer,
UserOptionsLookup $userOptionsLookup,
Function addQueryCondsForWatchedItemsForUser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function addQueryCondsForWatchedItemsForUser(
IReadableDatabase $db, UserIdentity $user, array $options, SelectQueryBuilder $queryBuilder
) {
$queryBuilder->where( [ 'wl_user' => $user->getId() ] );
if ( $options['namespaceIds'] ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER_ID, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_NOT_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
array_key_exists( 'onlyByUser', $options ) || array_key_exists( 'notByUser', $options )
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER_ID, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_NOT_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
array_key_exists( 'onlyByUser', $options ) || array_key_exists( 'notByUser', $options )
Function getUserRelatedConds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getUserRelatedConds( IReadableDatabase $db, Authority $user, array $options ) {
if ( !array_key_exists( 'onlyByUser', $options ) && !array_key_exists( 'notByUser', $options ) ) {
return [];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryConds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getWatchedItemsWithRCInfoQueryConds(
IReadableDatabase $db,
User $user,
array $options
) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getWatchedItemsForUser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getWatchedItemsForUser( UserIdentity $user, array $options = [] ) {
if ( !$user->isRegistered() ) {
// TODO: should this just return an empty array or rather complain loud at this point
// as e.g. ApiBase::getWatchlistUser does?
return [];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER_ID, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_NOT_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
array_key_exists( 'onlyByUser', $options ) || array_key_exists( 'notByUser', $options )
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::INCLUDE_USER_ID, $options['includeFields'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
in_array( self::FILTER_NOT_ANON, $options['filters'] ) ||
array_key_exists( 'onlyByUser', $options ) || array_key_exists( 'notByUser', $options )
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76