Showing 112 of 112 total issues
Function SectionDelete
has 13 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func SectionDelete(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
// get "section_id" from post form
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
return logAndRenderJSONWithStatus(w, Resp{Msg: "Parse form is not valid"}, http.StatusBadRequest,
logTypeErr, "Section", "app", err.Error())
Function ExecUpdateResult
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ExecUpdateResult(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
var rv models.TestCaseResult
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("TestExec", "type", "http", "msg ", err)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getPeriodReqTestCaseCoverage
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getPeriodReqTestCaseCoverage(c *interfacer.AppContext, projectID, currentCov int) (string, error) {
// req-testcase coverage is calculated by dealing with TcReqRelationHistory, Requirement table
// This is pretty complex, if you have good idea to solve it : VERY WELCOME : )
// first get all requirements in this project
Function SaveUser
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func SaveUser(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
// First parse form value
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("User", "type", "http", "msg ", err)
}
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for _, n := range sections {
var nodeType string
var parent string
if n.RootNode == true {
nodeType = "root"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 135.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for _, n := range sections {
var nodeType string
var parent string
if n.RootNode == true {
nodeType = "root"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 135.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for _, n := range sections {
var nodeType string
var parent string
if n.RootNode == true {
nodeType = "root"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 135.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function saveUpdateRequirement
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func saveUpdateRequirement(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, isUpdate bool) error {
var req models.Requirement
vars := mux.Vars(r)
idStr := vars["id"]
Function saveUpdateRequirement
has 10 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func saveUpdateRequirement(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, isUpdate bool) error {
var req models.Requirement
vars := mux.Vars(r)
idStr := vars["id"]
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func TestUserValidateInformalEmail(t *testing.T) {
user := User{Name: "Brünhild", Email: "asdadsasda", Password: "Destory_Rome"}
errorMap := user.Validate()
if len(errorMap) == 0 {
t.Error(`User{Name : "Brünhild", Email:"asdasdad"})`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func TestUserValidateAbsenseName(t *testing.T) {
user := User{Name: "", Email: "aaa@bbb.com", Password: "Destory_Rome"}
errorMap := user.Validate()
if len(errorMap) == 0 {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func TestUserValidateAbsenseEmail(t *testing.T) {
user := User{Name: "Brünhild", Email: "", Password: "Destory_Rome"}
errorMap := user.Validate()
if len(errorMap) == 0 {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 116.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function ValidationFailAndRedirect
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ValidationFailAndRedirect(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter,
r *http.Request, errorMap map[string]string, url string, value interface{}) {
Function AddTool
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func AddTool(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("Build", "type", "http", "msg ", err)
return errors.HttpError{Status: http.StatusInternalServerError, Desc: "ParseForm failed"}
Method Jenkins.AddJenkinsBuilds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (j Jenkins) AddJenkinsBuilds(url string, projectID int, db *gorm.DB) error {
if db == nil {
return errors.New("Wrong database handler!")
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Jenkins.AddJenkinsBuilds
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (j Jenkins) AddJenkinsBuilds(url string, projectID int, db *gorm.DB) error {
if db == nil {
return errors.New("Wrong database handler!")
}
Function ExecDone
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func ExecDone(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("TestExec", "type", "http", "msg ", err)
return errors.HttpError{Status: http.StatusInternalServerError, Desc: "ParseForm failed"}
Function ExecUpdateResult
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func ExecUpdateResult(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
var rv models.TestCaseResult
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("TestExec", "type", "http", "msg ", err)
Function SectionAdd
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func SectionAdd(c *interfacer.AppContext, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) error {
// get "section_id" from post form
if err := r.ParseForm(); err != nil {
log.Error("Section", "type", "app", "msg ", err.Error())
return RenderJSONWithStatus(w, Resp{Msg: "Parse form is not valid"}, http.StatusBadRequest)
Method Travis.AddTravisBuilds
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (t Travis) AddTravisBuilds(url string, projectID int, db *gorm.DB) error {
repo, u, err := t.ConnectionTest(url)
if err != nil {
return errors.New("Fail to get Travis repo information")