Showing 710 of 710 total issues
Function MemberExpression
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
MemberExpression(node) {
const isDefaultProp = propsUtil.isDefaultPropsDeclaration(node);
if (!isDefaultProp) {
return;
Function refersToReactFragment
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function refersToReactFragment(node, name) {
const variableInit = variableUtil.findVariableByName(context, node, name);
if (!variableInit) {
return false;
}
Function getPropertyName
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getPropertyName(context, node, utils, checkAsyncSafeLifeCycles) {
const property = node.property;
if (property) {
switch (property.type) {
case 'Identifier':
Function handleOpeningElement
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function handleOpeningElement(node) {
const sourceCode = getSourceCode(context);
let prevToken = sourceCode.getTokenBefore(node);
if (!prevToken) {
return;
Function CallExpression
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CallExpression(node) {
const callee = node.callee;
const parent = node.parent;
if (callee.type !== 'MemberExpression') {
return;
Function reportErrorIfLifecycleMethodCasingTypo
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function reportErrorIfLifecycleMethodCasingTypo(node) {
const key = node.key;
let nodeKeyName = key.name;
if (key.type === 'Literal') {
nodeKeyName = key.value;
Function create
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignoreCase = configuration.ignoreCase || false;
return {
Function Program:exit
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'Program:exit'() {
const list = components.list();
values(list).filter((component) => {
if (functions === 'ignore' && astUtil.isFunctionLike(component.node)) {
Function ImportDeclaration
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ImportDeclaration(node) {
if (node.source && node.source.value === 'prop-types') { // import PropType from "prop-types"
if (node.specifiers.length > 0) {
propTypesPackageName = node.specifiers[0].local.name;
} else {
Function findAllTypeAnnotations
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function findAllTypeAnnotations(identifier, node) {
if (node.type === 'TSTypeLiteral' || node.type === 'ObjectTypeAnnotation' || node.type === 'TSInterfaceBody') {
const currentNode = [].concat(
objectTypeAnnotations.get(identifier.name) || [],
node
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
(ancestor.type !== 'Property' && ancestor.type !== 'MethodDefinition' && ancestor.type !== 'ClassProperty' && ancestor.type !== 'PropertyDefinition')
|| !nameMatches(ancestor.key.name)
|| (mode !== 'disallow-in-func' && depth > 1)
) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
astUtil.isCallExpression(node)
&& node.callee
&& node.callee.type === 'Identifier'
&& node.callee.name === 'String'
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
relatedComponent
&& (componentUtil.isES6Component(relatedComponent.node, context) || (
relatedComponent.node.type !== 'ClassDeclaration' && utils.isReturningJSX(relatedComponent.node)))
&& (node.parent && node.parent.type === 'AssignmentExpression' && node.parent.right)
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
parent.type && parent.type === 'JSXAttribute'
&& (node.expression && node.expression.type
&& node.expression.type !== 'Literal'
&& node.expression.type !== 'StringLiteral'
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
values(components.list()).forEach((component) => {
const properties = astUtil.getComponentProperties(component.node);
checkPropsOrder(properties);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fix(fixer) {
const previousToken = sourceCode.getTokenBefore(closingSlash);
return fixer.removeRange([previousToken.range[1], closingSlash.range[0]]);
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
fix(fixer) {
const previousToken = sourceCode.getTokenBefore(closingSlash);
return fixer.removeRange([previousToken.range[1], closingSlash.range[0]]);
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
values(components.list()).forEach((component) => {
const properties = astUtil.getComponentProperties(component.node);
reportNoArrowFunctionLifecycle(properties);
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function isNodeALifeCycleMethod
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function isNodeALifeCycleMethod(node, checkAsyncSafeLifeCycles) {
if (node.key) {
if (node.kind === 'constructor') {
return true;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getReactVersionFromContext
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getReactVersionFromContext(context) {
readDefaultReactVersionFromContext(context);
let confVer = defaultVersion;
// .eslintrc shared settings (https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/configuring#adding-shared-settings)
if (context.settings && context.settings.react && context.settings.react.version) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"