Showing 696 of 696 total issues
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, util) => {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const allowDestructuredState = configuration.allowDestructuredState || false;
return {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: ((context) => {
let classInfo = null;
// Takes an ObjectExpression node and adds all named Property nodes to the
// current set of properties.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File no-unknown-property.js
has 479 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* @fileoverview Prevent usage of unknown DOM property
* @author Yannick Croissant
*/
Function create
has 187 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const options = Object.assign({}, defaultOptions, context.options[0]);
const checkFragmentShorthand = options.checkFragmentShorthand;
const checkKeyMustBeforeSpread = options.checkKeyMustBeforeSpread;
const warnOnDuplicates = options.warnOnDuplicates;
Function create
has 183 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, utils) => {
let propTypesPackageName = null;
let reactPackageName = null;
function checkValidPropTypeQualifier(node) {
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components) => {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignored = configuration.ignore || [];
const skipUndeclared = configuration.skipUndeclared || false;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has 178 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const MESSAGE_LOCATION = {
'after-props': 'placed after the last prop',
'after-tag': 'placed after the opening tag',
'props-aligned': 'aligned with the last prop',
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
function isSetStateCall(node) {
return node.type === 'CallExpression'
&& node.callee.property
&& node.callee.property.name === 'setState'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has 175 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Public
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
const indexParamNames = [];
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getPropertyName(node) {
if (node.key || ['MethodDefinition', 'Property'].indexOf(node.type) !== -1) {
return node.key.name;
}
if (node.type === 'MemberExpression') {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 175.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getPropertyName(node) {
if (node.key || ['MethodDefinition', 'Property'].indexOf(node.type) !== -1) {
return node.key.name;
}
if (node.type === 'MemberExpression') {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 175.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (hasLeftNewline && !needsNewlines) {
report(context, messages.unexpectedAfter, 'unexpectedAfter', {
node: leftCurly,
fix(fixer) {
return sourceCode
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (hasRightNewline && !needsNewlines) {
report(context, messages.unexpectedBefore, 'unexpectedBefore', {
node: rightCurly,
fix(fixer) {
return sourceCode
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function create
has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, utils) => {
const config = context.options[0] || {};
const ignoreTranspilerName = config.ignoreTranspilerName || false;
const checkContextObjects = (config.checkContextObjects || false) && testReactVersion(context, '>= 16.3.0');
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const allowed = new Set(((context.options.length > 0) && context.options[0].allow) || []);
/**
* @param {ASTNode} expression An Identifier node
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const config = context.options[0] || {};
const allowExpressions = config.allowExpressions || false;
const reactPragma = pragmaUtil.getFromContext(context);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function checkSorted(declarations) {
// function fix(fixer) {
// return propTypesSortUtil.fixPropTypesSort(fixer, context, declarations, ignoreCase);
// }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 166.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function checkSorted(declarations) {
// function fix(fixer) {
// return propTypesSortUtil.fixPropTypesSort(fixer, context, declarations, ignoreCase);
// }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 166.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function create
has 156 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, utils) => {
const configuration = context.options[0] || DEFAULT_OPTION;
const ignoreClassFields = (context.options[1] && (context.options[1].ignoreClassFields === true)) || false;
const destructureInSignature = (context.options[1] && context.options[1].destructureInSignature) || 'ignore';
const sfcParams = createSFCParams();
Function create
has 156 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const options = Object.assign({}, optionDefaults, context.options[0]);
function nodeKey(node) {
return `${node.loc.start.line},${node.loc.start.column}`;