Showing 696 of 696 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (node.loc.start.line !== node.loc.end.line && option === 'proportional-always') {
if (leftToken.loc.end.line === closingToken.loc.start.line) {
report(context, messages.beforeCloseNeedNewline, 'beforeCloseNeedNewline', {
node,
loc: leftToken.loc.end,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 133.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function CallExpression
has 122 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
CallExpression(node) {
const isImmediateReturn = node.parent
&& node.parent.type === 'ReturnStatement';
if (isImmediateReturn || !util.isReactHookCall(node, ['useState'])) {
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
function getIgnoreConfig() {
return (context.options[0] && context.options[0].ignore) || DEFAULTS.ignore;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignoreCase = configuration.ignoreCase || false;
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, utils) => {
const typeAliases = {};
const exactWrappers = propWrapperUtil.getExactPropWrapperFunctions(context);
const sourceCode = context.getSourceCode();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isDestructuredFromPragmaImport
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function isDestructuredFromPragmaImport(variable, context) {
const pragma = pragmaUtil.getFromContext(context);
const variables = variableUtil.variablesInScope(context);
const variableInScope = variableUtil.getVariable(variables, variable);
if (variableInScope) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
// Keep track of all the variable names pointing to a bind call,
// bind expression or an arrow function in different block statements
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
function reportInvalidEntity(node) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const entities = configuration.forbid || DEFAULTS;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
// Keep track of all the variable names pointing to a bind call,
// bind expression or an arrow function in different block statements
Function create
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: ((context) => {
let classInfo = null;
// Takes an ObjectExpression node and adds all named Property nodes to the
// current set of properties.
Function checkLiteralValueNode
has 113 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function checkLiteralValueNode(context, attributeName, node, parentNode, parentNodeName) {
if (typeof node.value !== 'string') {
report(context, messages.onlyStrings, 'onlyStrings', {
node,
data: { attributeName },
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getName(node) {
node = uncast(node);
const type = node.type;
if (type === 'Identifier') {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 124.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function getName(node) {
node = uncast(node);
const type = node.type;
if (type === 'Identifier') {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 124.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getStatelessComponent
has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getStatelessComponent(node) {
const parent = node.parent;
if (
node.type === 'FunctionDeclaration'
&& (!node.id || isFirstLetterCapitalized(node.id.name))
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignoreCase = configuration.ignoreCase || false;
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components) => {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignored = configuration.ignore || [];
const skipUndeclared = configuration.skipUndeclared || false;
Function create
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create: Components.detect((context, components, utils) => {
const typeAliases = {};
const exactWrappers = propWrapperUtil.getExactPropWrapperFunctions(context);
const sourceCode = context.getSourceCode();
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function reportNoBeginningNewline(node, token, spacing) {
report(context, messages.noNewlineAfter, 'noNewlineAfter', {
node,
loc: token.loc.start,
data: {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function reportNoEndingNewline(node, token, spacing) {
report(context, messages.noNewlineBefore, 'noNewlineBefore', {
node,
loc: token.loc.start,
data: {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function create
has 107 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
create(context) {
const configuration = context.options[0] || {};
const ignoreCase = configuration.ignoreCase || false;
const callbacksLast = configuration.callbacksLast || false;
const shorthandFirst = configuration.shorthandFirst || false;