Method load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 91 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final static void load(Map<? super String, ? super String> map, InputStream sm, String charset,
boolean caseInsensitive) throws IOException {
final PushbackInputStream pis = new PushbackInputStream(sm, 3);
if (charset == null || charset.startsWith("UTF")) {
final byte[] ahead = new byte[3];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse0
has a Cognitive Complexity of 70 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static final Map
parse0(Map map, String src, char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis, boolean multiple)
throws IllegalSyntaxException {
if (separator == (char)0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Maps.java
has 468 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* Maps.java
Purpose: Utilities for Map
Description:
Method load
has 100 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final static void load(Map<? super String, ? super String> map, InputStream sm, String charset,
boolean caseInsensitive) throws IOException {
final PushbackInputStream pis = new PushbackInputStream(sm, 3);
if (charset == null || charset.startsWith("UTF")) {
final byte[] ahead = new byte[3];
Method parse0
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static final Map
parse0(Map map, String src, char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis, boolean multiple)
throws IllegalSyntaxException {
if (separator == (char)0)
Method next
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static final Token
next(String src, String delimiters, int j, boolean whitespaceAware,
boolean parenthesis) {
final StringBuffer tksb = new StringBuffer(64);
final int len = src.length();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Maps
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class Maps {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Maps.class);
/**
* Reads a property list (key and element pairs) from the input stream,
Method toStringBuffer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final StringBuffer
toStringBuffer(StringBuffer sb, Map<? super String, ? super String> map, char quote, char separator, char pairSeparator) {
if (separator == (char)0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Separator cannot be 0");
if (map.isEmpty())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method next
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static final Token
next(String src, String delimiters, int j, boolean whitespaceAware,
boolean parenthesis) {
final StringBuffer tksb = new StringBuffer(64);
final int len = src.length();
Method toStringBuffer
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static final StringBuffer
toStringBuffer(StringBuffer sb, Map<? super String, ? super String> map, char quote, char separator, char pairSeparator) {
if (separator == (char)0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Separator cannot be 0");
if (map.isEmpty())
Method parse0
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse0(Map map, String src, char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis, boolean multiple)
Method parseMultiple
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMultiple(Map<? super String, Collection<String>> map,
String src, char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis) throws IllegalSyntaxException {
Method parse
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse(Map<? super String, ? super String> map,
String src,char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis) throws IllegalSyntaxException {
Method parse
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse(Map<? super String, ? super String> map,
String src, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis) throws IllegalSyntaxException {
Method parseMultiple
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseMultiple(Map<? super String, Collection<String>> map,
String src, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue,
boolean parenthesis) throws IllegalSyntaxException {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (j >= 0 && line.charAt(j) == '}') {
if (j > 0)
j = 1 + Strings.skipWhitespacesBackward(line, j - 1);
if (j == 0) //no non-space before }
break;
Method toStringBuffer
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
toStringBuffer(StringBuffer sb, Map<? super String, ? super String> map, char quote, char separator, char pairSeparator) {
Method parse
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse(Map<? super String, ? super String> map, String src, char separator, char quote, boolean asValue)
Method parse
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse(Map<? super String, ? super String> map, String src, char pairSeparator, char separator, char quote)
Method next
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
next(String src, String delimiters, int j, boolean whitespaceAware,
boolean parenthesis) {
Method put
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static void put(Map map, String name, String value, boolean multiple) {
if (multiple) {
List l = (List)map.get(name);
if (l == null)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method skipParenthesis
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static int skipParenthesis(String src, int j, char beg, char end) {
for (int len = src.length(), depth = 0; ++j < len;) {
final char cc = src.charAt(j);
if (cc == '\\') ++j; //skip next
else if (cc == beg) ++depth;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getEndingParenthesis
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static final char getEndingParenthesis(char cc) {
return cc == '{' ? '}': cc == '(' ? ')': cc == '[' ? ']': (char)0;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private static int skipParenthesis(String src, int j, char beg, char end) {
for (int len = src.length(), depth = 0; ++j < len;) {
final char cc = src.charAt(j);
if (cc == '\\') ++j; //skip next
else if (cc == beg) ++depth;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 95.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private static final char getEndingParenthesis(char cc) {
return cc == '{' ? '}': cc == '(' ? ')': cc == '[' ? ']': (char)0;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76