File au.ts has 1505 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* au.ts
Purpose:
ZK Client Engine
Description:Function sendNow has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function sendNow(dt: zk.Desktop): boolean {
if (zAu.disabledRequest) {
if (zk.processing)
zk.endProcessing();
return false;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _doCmds has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _doCmds(sid?: string): void { //called by mount.js, too
for (var fn: (() => void) | undefined; fn = doCmdFns.shift();)
fn();
var ex: Error | undefined, j = 0, rid = responseId;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sendNow has 129 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function sendNow(dt: zk.Desktop): boolean {
if (zAu.disabledRequest) {
if (zk.processing)
zk.endProcessing();
return false;Function doProcess has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doProcess(cmd: string, data: ({ $u?: string } & zk.Widget | undefined)[]): void { //decoded
if (!dataNotReady(cmd, data)) {
if (!zAu.processPhase) {
zAu.processPhase = cmd;
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dataNotReady has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function dataNotReady(cmd: string, data: ({ $u?: string } & zk.Widget | undefined)[]): boolean {
for (var j = data.length, id: string | undefined, w: zk.Widget | undefined; j--;)
if (id = data[j] && data[j]!.$u) {
if (!(w = zk.Widget.$(id))) { //not ready
var processFn = function (): void {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _respFailure has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _respFailure(response: Response, reqInf: AuRequestInfo, rstatus: number): boolean {
var eru = zAu._errURIs['' + rstatus];
if (typeof eru == 'string') {
zUtl.go(eru);
return true;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _deconstructPacket has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _deconstructPacket(data: ArrayBufferView | unknown & { buffer?} | undefined, buffers: unknown[]): unknown {
if (!data) return data;
if (_isBinary(data)) {
const placeholder = { _placeholder: true, num: buffers.length };- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _onResponseReady has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _onResponseReady(response: Response): void {
var reqInf = zAu.ajaxReqInf, sid: string | undefined;
try {
if (response) {
zAu.ajaxReq = zAu.ajaxReqInf = undefined;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _respSuccess has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _respSuccess(response: Response, reqInf: AuRequestInfo, sid: string | number): boolean {
if (sid && sid != zAu.seqId) {
zAu._errCode = 'ZK-SID ' + (sid ? 'mismatch' : 'required');
zAu.afterResponse(); //continue the pending request if any
return true;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _doCmds has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _doCmds(sid?: string): void { //called by mount.js, too
for (var fn: (() => void) | undefined; fn = doCmdFns.shift();)
fn();
var ex: Error | undefined, j = 0, rid = responseId;Function _pfsend has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _pfsend(dt: zk.Desktop, fetchOpts: RequestInit, completeOnly: boolean, forceAjax: boolean): void {
var ws = !forceAjax && typeof zWs != 'undefined' && zWs.ready,
fetchHeaders = fetchOpts.headers;
if (!completeOnly) {
var dtt = dt.id + '-' + pfIndex++ + '=' + Math.round(jq.now());- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addAft has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function addAft(wgt: zk.Widget, ...codes: string[]): void {
const p = wgt.parent,
onSizeChildren: zk.Widget[] = [],
fn = function (child: zk.Widget): void {
var act = _beforeAction(child, 'show') as never;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clientInfo has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function clientInfo(dtid?: string): void {
zAu._cInfoReg = true;
var orient = '',
dpr = 1.0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function doCmdsNow has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doCmdsNow(cmds: AuCommands): boolean {
var rtags = cmds.rtags || {}, ex: undefined | Error;
try {
while (cmds && cmds.length) {
if (zk.mounting) return false;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _constructPacket has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _constructPacket(data: unknown | undefined, files: unknown[]): unknown {
if (!data) return data;
if (Array.isArray(data)) {
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
data[i] = _constructPacket(data[i] as never, files);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ajaxSendNow has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxSendNow(reqInf: AuRequestInfo): void {
var fetchOpts: RequestInit = {
credentials: 'same-origin',
method: 'POST',
headers: reqInf.content instanceof FormData ? { 'ZK-SID': '' + reqInf.sid } : { 'Content-Type': zAu.ajaxSettings.contentType, 'ZK-SID': '' + reqInf.sid },Function pushReqCmds has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pushReqCmds(reqInf: AuRequestInfo, response: AuResponse): boolean {
var dt = reqInf.dt,
rt = response.responseText;
if (!rt) {
if (zk.pfmeter) zAu._pfdone(dt, zAu.pfGetIds(response));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _rmDesktop has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _rmDesktop(dt: zk.Desktop, dummy?: boolean): void {
var url = zk.ajaxURI(undefined, { desktop: dt, au: true }),
data = jq.param({
dtid: dt.id,
cmd_0: dummy ? 'dummy' : 'rmDesktop',- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function toJSON has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function toJSON(
target: zk.Widget | undefined,
data: // `pageX` and `pageY` should co-exist
| { pageX: number; pageY: number; x?: number; y?: number; z$dateKeys?: string[] }
| { pageX?: undefined; pageY?: undefined; x?: number; y?: number; z$dateKeys?: string[] }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function beforeSend has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function beforeSend(uri: string, aureq: zk.Event, dt?: zk.Desktop): string {
var target: zk.Widget | undefined, tag: string | undefined;
if ((target = aureq.target) && (tag = target.autag)) {
tag = '/' + encodeURIComponent(tag);
if (!uri.includes('/_/')) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _respFailure has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _respFailure(response: Response, reqInf: AuRequestInfo, rstatus: number): boolean {
var eru = zAu._errURIs['' + rstatus];
if (typeof eru == 'string') {
zUtl.go(eru);
return true;Function doCmdsNow has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doCmdsNow(cmds: AuCommands): boolean {
var rtags = cmds.rtags || {}, ex: undefined | Error;
try {
while (cmds && cmds.length) {
if (zk.mounting) return false;Function doProcess has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function doProcess(cmd: string, data: ({ $u?: string } & zk.Widget | undefined)[]): void { //decoded
if (!dataNotReady(cmd, data)) {
if (!zAu.processPhase) {
zAu.processPhase = cmd;
}Function pushReqCmds has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function pushReqCmds(reqInf: AuRequestInfo, response: AuResponse): boolean {
var dt = reqInf.dt,
rt = response.responseText;
if (!rt) {
if (zk.pfmeter) zAu._pfdone(dt, zAu.pfGetIds(response));Function encode has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function encode(j: number, aureq: zk.Event, dt: zk.Desktop): string {
var target = aureq.target,
opts = aureq.opts || {},
portlet2Namespace = '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addChd has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function addChd(wgt: zk.Widget, ...rargs: string[]): void {
if (wgt) {
const onSizeChildren: zk.Widget[] = [],
fn = function (child: zk.Widget): void {
const act = _beforeAction(child, 'show') as never,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _rmDesktop has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _rmDesktop(dt: zk.Desktop, dummy?: boolean): void {
var url = zk.ajaxURI(undefined, { desktop: dt, au: true }),
data = jq.param({
dtid: dt.id,
cmd_0: dummy ? 'dummy' : 'rmDesktop',Function addAft has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function addAft(wgt: zk.Widget, ...codes: string[]): void {
const p = wgt.parent,
onSizeChildren: zk.Widget[] = [],
fn = function (child: zk.Widget): void {
var act = _beforeAction(child, 'show') as never;Function clientInfo has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function clientInfo(dtid?: string): void {
zAu._cInfoReg = true;
var orient = '',
dpr = 1.0;
Function addChd has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function addChd(wgt: zk.Widget, ...rargs: string[]): void {
if (wgt) {
const onSizeChildren: zk.Widget[] = [],
fn = function (child: zk.Widget): void {
const act = _beforeAction(child, 'show') as never,Function _deconstructPacket has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _deconstructPacket(data: ArrayBufferView | unknown & { buffer?} | undefined, buffers: unknown[]): unknown {
if (!data) return data;
if (_isBinary(data)) {
const placeholder = { _placeholder: true, num: buffers.length };Function wrongValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function wrongValue(...args: string[]): void {
for (var i = 0, len = args.length - 1; i < len; i += 2) {
var uuid = args[i], msg = args[i + 1],
wgt = zk.Widget.$(uuid);
if (wgt) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function redirect has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function redirect(url: string, target?: string): void {
try {
zUtl.go(url, { target: target });
// '#' for bookmark change only, Bug ZK-2874- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function showNotification has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function showNotification(msg: string, type: zul.wgt.NotificationType, pid: string, ref: zk.Widget,
pos: string, off: zk.Offset, dur: number, closable: boolean): void {Function send has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function send(aureq: zk.Event, timeout = 0): void {
//ZK-2790: when unload event is triggered, the desktop is destroyed
//we shouldn't send request back to server
if (zk.unloading && zk.rmDesktoping) //it's safer to check if both zk.unloading and zk.rmDesktoping are true
return;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ajaxSend has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxSend(dt: zk.Desktop, aureq: zk.Event, timeout?: number): void {
//ZK-1523: dt(desktop) could be null, so search the desktop from target's parent.
//call stack: echo2() -> send()
if (!dt) {
//original dt is decided by aureq.target.desktop, so start by it's parent.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (zk.mounting) doCmdFns.push(fnPfDone);
else fnPfDone();Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, key)) {
newData[key] = _deconstructPacket(data[key] as never, buffers);
}Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (Object.hasOwn(content, key)) {
reqContent += (reqContent.length ? '&' : '') + key + '=' + encodeURIComponent(content[key] as string);
}Function ajaxSendNow has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ajaxSendNow(reqInf: AuRequestInfo): void {
var fetchOpts: RequestInit = {
credentials: 'same-origin',
method: 'POST',
headers: reqInf.content instanceof FormData ? { 'ZK-SID': '' + reqInf.sid } : { 'Content-Type': zAu.ajaxSettings.contentType, 'ZK-SID': '' + reqInf.sid },- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clearWrongValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function clearWrongValue(...args: string[]): void {
for (var i = args.length; i--;) {
var wgt = zk.Widget.$(args[i]);
if (wgt) {
var toClearErrMsg = function (w: zk.Widget & { clearErrorMessage?() }) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
do {
if (id = data[j] && data[j]!.$u)
data[j] = zk.Widget.$(id) as never;
} while (j--);Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (v != 410 //not timeout (SC_GONE)
&& !(reqInf.rtags && reqInf.rtags.isDummy) //ZK-3304: dummy request shouldn't reset timeout
&& (!reqInf.rtags || !reqInf.rtags.onTimer || zk.timerAlive)) // Bug ZK-2720 only timer-keep-alive should reset the timeout
zAu._resetTimeout();Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((v = response.headers.get('ZK-Error'))
&& !zAu.onResponseError(response, v = zk.parseInt(v) ?? v)
&& (v == 5501 || v == 5502) //Handle only ZK's SC_OUT_OF_SEQUENCE or SC_ACTIVATION_TIMEOUT
&& zAu.confirmRetry('FAILED_TO_RESPONSE',
v == 5501 ? 'Request out of sequence' : 'Activation timeout')) {Function _respException has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function _respException(reqInf: AuRequestInfo, e: Error): boolean {
if (!window.zAu)
return true; //the doc has been unloaded
zAu.ajaxReq = zAu.ajaxReqInf = undefined;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return false;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return true;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return newData;Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
return data;Function sendAhead has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function sendAhead(aureq: zk.Event, timeout = 0): void {
const t = aureq.target;
if (t) {
const dt = t instanceof zk.Desktop ? t : t.desktop!;
zAu.getAuRequests(dt).unshift(aureq);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function echo has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function echo(dtid?: string | zk.Desktop): void {
var dt = zk.Desktop.$(dtid),
aureqs = dt ? zAu.getAuRequests(dt) : [];
// Bug ZK-2741
for (var i = 0, j = aureqs.length; i < j; i++) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pushCmds has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function pushCmds(cmds: AuCommands, rs: [string, ({ $u?: string } & zk.Widget | undefined)[]][]): void {
for (var j = 0, rl = rs ? rs.length : 0; j < rl; ++j) {
var r = rs[j],
cmd = r[0],
data = r[1];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (p && !p.z_rod)
zk.afterMount(function () {
if (zk(p).isRealVisible()) {
zUtl.fireSized(p);
} else {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (p && !p.z_rod)
zk.afterMount(function () {
if (zk(p).isRealVisible()) {
zUtl.fireSized(p);
} else {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (const key in data) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, key)) {
data[key] = _constructPacket(data[key] as never, files);
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (const key in data) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, key)) {
newData[key] = _deconstructPacket(data[key] as never, buffers);
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ids = dt._pfRecvIds) {
if (fetchHeaders) fetchHeaders['ZK-Client-Receive'] = ids;
if (ws) {
zWs.setRequestHeaders('ZK-Client-Receive', ids);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ids = dt._pfDoneIds) {
if (fetchHeaders) fetchHeaders['ZK-Client-Complete'] = ids;
if (ws) {
zWs.setRequestHeaders('ZK-Client-Complete', ids);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
newData[i] = _deconstructPacket(data[i] as never, buffers);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
data[i] = _constructPacket(data[i] as never, files);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let args = arguments, j = 1; j < args.length; ++j)
window.zkx_(args[j] as never, fn);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let args = arguments, j = 1; j < args.length; ++j)
window.zkx_(args[j] as never, fn);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var c in code as Record<number | string, string>)
zAu.setPushErrorURI(parseInt(c), code[c] as string);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var c in code as Record<number | string, string>)
zAu.setErrorURI(parseInt(c), code[c] as string);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export function _pfdone(dt: zk.Desktop, pfIds?: string | null): void {
zAu.pfAddIds(dt, '_pfDoneIds', pfIds);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export function _pfrecv(dt: zk.Desktop, pfIds?: string | null): void {
zAu.pfAddIds(dt, '_pfRecvIds', pfIds);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 45.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76