File ParamCall.java
has 406 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package org.zkoss.bind.impl;
import java.beans.BeanInfo;
import java.beans.Introspector;
import java.beans.PropertyDescriptor;
Method resolveParameter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected Object resolveParameter(Annotation[] parmAnnos, Class<?> paramType, Method method, int index) {
Object val = null;
boolean hitResolver = false;
Default defAnno = null;
for (Annotation anno : parmAnnos) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ParamCall
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class ParamCall {
private static final Logger _log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ParamCall.class);
private static final Paranamer _PARANAMER = new CachingParanamer(new AdaptiveParanamer());
Method get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Object get(ContextType type) {
switch (type) {
//bind contexts
case BIND_CONTEXT:
return _bindContext;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setComponent
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void setComponent(Component comp) {
_component = comp;
//scope param
_paramResolvers.put(ScopeParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
Method resolvePositionalOrNoAnnoParameter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Object resolvePositionalOrNoAnnoParameter(Class<?> returnType, Method method, int index) {
Object val = null;
if (_bindingArgs != null) {
int argIndex = 0;
for (Map.Entry<String, Object> entry : _bindingArgs.entrySet()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setExecution
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void setExecution(Execution exec) {
_execution = exec;
//http param
_paramResolvers.put(QueryParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
Method resolveParameter
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected Object resolveParameter(Annotation[] parmAnnos, Class<?> paramType, Method method, int index) {
Object val = null;
boolean hitResolver = false;
Default defAnno = null;
for (Annotation anno : parmAnnos) {
Method resolveParameter0
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected Object resolveParameter0(Object val, Class<?> returnType) {
if (val != null && returnType.isAssignableFrom(val.getClass())) { //escape
return val;
} else if (Component.class.isAssignableFrom(returnType) && val instanceof String) {
return _root.getDesktop().getComponentByUuidIfAny((String) val);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setBindingArgs
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void setBindingArgs(final Map<String, Object> bindingArgs) {
this._bindingArgs = bindingArgs;
_paramResolvers.put(BindingParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
public Object resolveParameter(Annotation anno, Class<?> returnType, Supplier<String> parameterName) {
Object val = bindingArgs.get(getAnnotatedParameterName(BindingParam.class, ((BindingParam) anno).value(), parameterName));
Method get
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Object get(ContextType type) {
switch (type) {
//bind contexts
case BIND_CONTEXT:
return _bindContext;
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void call(Object base, Method method) {
Method originalMethod = ViewModelAnnotationResolvers.getOriginalMethod(base, method);
Class<?>[] paramTypes = originalMethod.getParameterTypes();
java.lang.annotation.Annotation[][] parmAnnos = originalMethod.getParameterAnnotations();
Object[] params = new Object[paramTypes.length];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return _root.getDesktop().getComponentByUuidIfAny((String) val);
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return val;
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
_paramResolvers.put(QueryParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
public Object resolveParameter(Annotation anno, Class<?> returnType, Supplier<String> parameterName) {
Object val = _execution.getParameter(getAnnotatedParameterName(QueryParam.class, ((QueryParam) anno).value(), parameterName));
return val == null ? null : Classes.coerce(returnType, val);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
_paramResolvers.put(ExecutionParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
public Object resolveParameter(Annotation anno, Class<?> returnType, Supplier<String> parameterName) {
Object val = _execution.getAttribute(getAnnotatedParameterName(ExecutionParam.class, ((ExecutionParam) anno).value(), parameterName));
return val == null ? null : Classes.coerce(returnType, val);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
_paramResolvers.put(HeaderParam.class, new ParamResolver<Annotation>() {
public Object resolveParameter(Annotation anno, Class<?> returnType, Supplier<String> parameterName) {
Object val = _execution.getHeader(getAnnotatedParameterName(HeaderParam.class, ((HeaderParam) anno).value(), parameterName));
return val == null ? null : Classes.coerce(returnType, val);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76