Sign upLogin

AndyObtiva/glimmer-dsl-swt

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 401 of 401 total issues

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(parent, *swt_style_symbols, options, &content)
        SWT::DisplayProxy.current_custom_widgets_and_shapes << self
        @parent_proxy = @parent = parent
        @parent_proxy = @parent&.get_data('proxy') if @parent.respond_to?(:get_data) && @parent.get_data('proxy')
        @swt_style_symbols = swt_style_symbols
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/glimmer/ui/custom_widget.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method post_add_content has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def post_add_content
        shown = false
        unless @initialize_tabs_on_select
          @show_listener = parent_proxy.on_swt_show do
            unless shown
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/glimmer/swt/tab_folder_proxy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method can_interpret? has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def can_interpret?(parent, keyword, *args, &block)
          Glimmer::Config.logger.debug {"keyword starts with on_: #{keyword.start_with?('on_')}"}
          return false unless keyword.start_with?('on_')
          proper_parent = parent.respond_to?(:swt_widget) || parent.is_a?(Glimmer::SWT::DisplayProxy) || parent.is_a?(Glimmer::SWT::Custom::Shape) || parent.is_a?(Glimmer::UI::CustomShape)
          Glimmer::Config.logger.debug {"parent #{parent} is a widget, shape, or display: #{proper_parent}"}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/glimmer/dsl/swt/listener_expression.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method orientation= has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def orientation=(value)
        if top_left_cell
          if value == :horizontal
            if top_left_cell.column_index + length > Grid::WIDTH
              raise "Top left cell #{top_left_cell} cannot fit ship #{name}"
Severity: Minor
Found in samples/elaborate/battleship/model/ship.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method method_name has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def method_name(keyword, method_arg_options)
            keyword = keyword.to_s
            method_arg_options = method_arg_options.select {|key, value| %w[fill gradient round].include?(key.to_s)}
            unless flyweight_method_names.keys.include?([keyword, method_arg_options])
              gradient = 'Gradient' if method_arg_options[:gradient]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/glimmer/swt/custom/shape.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method print has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def print(gc=nil, job_name: nil)
        if gc.is_a?(org.eclipse.swt.graphics.GC)
          @swt_widget.print(gc)
        else
          image = Image.new(DisplayProxy.instance.swt_display, bounds)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method regenerate has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def regenerate
    @thread = Thread.new do
      @button.enabled = false
      @path1.clear
      @path2.clear
    Severity: Minor
    Found in samples/hello/hello_canvas_path.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method initialize has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def initialize(*init_args, swt_widget: nil)
        auto_exec do
          @image_double_buffered = !!(init_args&.last&.include?(:image_double_buffered) && init_args&.last&.delete(:image_double_buffered))
          if swt_widget.nil?
            underscored_widget_name, parent, args = init_args
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method setup_shape_painting has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def setup_shape_painting
          # TODO consider performance optimization relating to order of shape rendering (affecting only further shapes not previous ones)
          if @paint_listener_proxy.nil?
            shape_painter = lambda do |paint_event|
              shape_painting_work = lambda do |paint_event|
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/glimmer/swt/custom/drawable.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method position_options has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def position_options
      [
        'CEO',
        'CFO',
        'CIO',
          Severity: Minor
          Found in samples/hello/hello_tree.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method countdown_group_field_composite has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def countdown_group_field_composite
    composite {
      row_layout {
        margin_width 0
        margin_height 0
            Severity: Minor
            Found in samples/elaborate/timer.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method configure_sorting has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      def configure_sorting
          @table_proxy.sort_strategy = lambda do
            new_sort = @table_proxy.sort_block || @table_proxy.sort_by_block || @table_proxy.sort_property
            new_sort_direction = @table_proxy.sort_direction
            return if new_sort == @last_sort && new_sort_direction == @last_sort_direction
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/glimmer/swt/custom/refined_table.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Method for has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        def for(underscored_custom_widget_name)
          unless flyweight_custom_widget_classes.keys.include?(underscored_custom_widget_name)
            begin
              extracted_namespaces = underscored_custom_widget_name.
                to_s.
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/glimmer/ui/custom_widget.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Method same_table_data? has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def same_table_data?(new_model_collection)
        (["text"] + TABLE_ITEM_PROPERTIES).all? do |table_item_property|
          table_cells = @table.swt_widget.items.map do |item|
            model = item.get_data
            @table.column_properties.each_with_index.map do |column_property, i|
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/glimmer/data_binding/table_items_binding.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                    Method for has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                            def for(underscored_custom_shape_name)
          unless flyweight_custom_shape_classes.keys.include?(underscored_custom_shape_name)
            begin
              extracted_namespaces = underscored_custom_shape_name.
                to_s.
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lib/glimmer/ui/custom_shape.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                      Method paint_pixel_by_pixel has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                              def paint_pixel_by_pixel(width = nil, height = nil, &each_pixel_color)
          if @image_double_buffered
            work = lambda do |paint_event|
              width ||= swt_drawable.bounds.width
              height ||= swt_drawable.bounds.height
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lib/glimmer/swt/custom/drawable.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                        Method paint_self has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                def paint_self(paint_event)
          @painting = true
          unless container?
            calculate_paint_args!
            @original_gc_properties = {} # this stores GC properties before making calls to updates TODO avoid using in pixel graphics
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lib/glimmer/swt/custom/shape.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                      checkbox: {
              widget_value_property: :selection,
              editor_gui: lambda do |args, model, property, table_proxy|
                first_time = true
                table_proxy.table_editor.minimumHeight = 25
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in lib/glimmer/swt/table_proxy.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                          lib/glimmer/swt/table_proxy.rb on lines 198..220

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 52.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                      :selection => lambda do |observer|
              on_widget_selected { |event|
                observer.call(@swt_widget.getSelection) unless @swt_widget.getCaretOffset == 0 && @last_modify_text != text
              }
              on_swt_keyup { |event|
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                          lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb on lines 480..489
                          lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb on lines 491..500

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 52.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                      :selection_count => lambda do |observer|
              on_widget_selected { |event|
                observer.call(@swt_widget.getSelectionCount) unless @swt_widget.getCaretOffset == 0 && @last_modify_text != text
              }
              on_swt_keyup { |event|
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
                          lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb on lines 469..478
                          lib/glimmer/swt/widget_proxy.rb on lines 491..500

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 52.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Severity
                          Category
                          Status
                          Source
                          Language