Showing 109 of 109 total issues
Method generate_module_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_module_config(line, module_name, module_operate_type)
line.sub(/(\s*)pod(\s*)('|")#{module_name}((\/[_a-zA-Z0-9]+)?)('|")([\s\S]*)/){
if ModuleOperateType::ADD == module_operate_type
module_path = BigkeeperParser.module_path(@user, module_name)
"#{$1}pod '#{module_name}#{$4}', :path => '#{module_path}'"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_unlock_pod_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_unlock_pod_list(is_all)
result = {}
pod_parser = PodfileParser.instance
#podfile 中 unlock pods
unlock_pods = pod_parser.get_unlock_pod_list
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method podspec_change
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def podspec_change(podspec_file, version, module_name)
temp_file = Tempfile.new(".#{module_name}.podspec", :encoding => 'UTF-8')
has_change = false
begin
File.open(podspec_file, 'r', :encoding => 'UTF-8') do |file|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(main_path)
self.main_path = main_path
$mode = 'PODS'
podfile_lock_lines = File.readlines("#{main_path}/Podfile.lock", :encoding => 'UTF-8')
Logger.highlight("Analyzing Podfile.lock...")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_module_version_name
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_module_version_name(build_file, version_name)
temp_file = Tempfile.new('.build.gradle.tmp')
isModifyPom = false
isBigkeeperScript = false
isBigkeeperBackupScript = false
Method deal_podfile_line
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deal_podfile_line(sentence)
return unless !sentence.strip.start_with?("#")
if sentence.strip.include?('pod ')
pod_model = PodfileModel.new(sentence)
if !pod_model.name.empty? &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method verify_rebase
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_rebase(path, branch_name, name)
# pull rebased branch
pull(path, branch_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_json
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_json(home_branches, module_info_list, version)
json_array = []
print_all = version == "all versions"
home_branches = home_branches.uniq
home_branches.each do | home_branch_name |
Method client_command
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.client_command
desc 'API for bigkeeper-client.'
command :client do | c |
c.desc 'Commands about operate modules.'
c.command :modules do |modules|
Method pod_command
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.pod_command
desc 'Podfile operation'
command :podfile do |podfile|
podfile.desc 'Podfile'
Method update_module_build
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_module_build(build_file, module_name, depend_modules, version_name)
module_full_path = BigkeeperParser.module_full_path(@path, @user, module_name)
cache_path = File.expand_path("#{module_full_path}/.bigkeeper")
big_build_file = "#{cache_path}/bigkeeper_build.gradle"
Method update_module_settings
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_module_settings(module_name, settings_file, depend_modules)
module_full_path = BigkeeperParser.module_full_path(@path, @user, module_name)
cache_path = File.expand_path("#{module_full_path}/.bigkeeper")
big_settings_file = "#{cache_path}/bigkeeper_settings.gradle"
Method update_home_settings
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_home_settings(settings_file, depend_modules)
cache_path = File.expand_path("#{@path}/.bigkeeper")
big_settings_file = "#{cache_path}/bigkeeper_settings.gradle"
if depend_modules.empty? && !File.exist?(big_settings_file)
Method update_home_build
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_home_build(build_file, depend_modules, version_name)
cache_path = File.expand_path("#{@path}/.bigkeeper")
big_build_file = "#{cache_path}/bigkeeper_build.gradle"
if depend_modules.empty? && !File.exist?(big_build_file)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
m.command :finish do |finish|
finish.action do |global_options, options, args|
path = File.expand_path(global_options[:path])
version = global_options[:ver]
user = global_options[:user].gsub(/[^0-9A-Za-z]/, '').downcase
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
m.command :start do |start|
start.action do |global_options, options, args|
path = File.expand_path(global_options[:path])
version = global_options[:ver]
user = global_options[:user].gsub(/[^0-9A-Za-z]/, '').downcase
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method generate_module_config
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_module_config(line, module_name, module_operate_type)
line.sub(/(\s*)pod(\s*)('|")#{module_name}((\/[_a-zA-Z0-9]+)?)('|")([\s\S]*)/){
if ModuleOperateType::ADD == module_operate_type
module_path = BigkeeperParser.module_path(@user, module_name)
"#{$1}pod '#{module_name}#{$4}', :path => '#{module_path}'"
Method get_all_public_file
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_all_public_file(path)
all_header = FileOperator.find_all_header_file("#{path}/Pods/#{@name}")
for file_path in all_header do
@header_file_list[@header_file_list.size] = file_path
file_name = File.basename(file_path)
Method pod_repo_push
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.pod_repo_push(path, module_name, source, version)
Logger.highlight(%Q(Start Pod repo push #{module_name}))
Dir.chdir(path) do
command = ""
p BigkeeperParser.source_spec_name(module_name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method podspec_change
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def podspec_change(podspec_file, version, module_name)
temp_file = Tempfile.new(".#{module_name}.podspec", :encoding => 'UTF-8')
has_change = false
begin
File.open(podspec_file, 'r', :encoding => 'UTF-8') do |file|