Showing 599 of 599 total issues
Function printOverview
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function printOverview()
{
$out = [];
$out[] = "<fieldset class='option_container'>
<legend>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function relevantNAPTRhostnameResolution
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function relevantNAPTRhostnameResolution()
{
// make sure the previous tests have been run before we go on
// preceding tests will cascade automatically if needed
if ($this->NAPTR_SRV_executed == RFC7585Tests::RETVAL_NOTRUNYET) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sendRequestToCa
has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function sendRequestToCa($csr, $revocationPin, $expiryDays): int
{
// initialise connection to eduPKI CA / eduroam RA and send the request to them
try {
if (in_array("eduroam IdP", $csr["POLICIES"]) && in_array("eduroam SP", $csr["POLICIES"])) {
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($_GET['res']) && is_array($_GET['res'])) {
$res = array_count_values($_GET['res']);
if ($res['FAILURE'] > 0) {
echo '<br>';
if ($res['FAILURE'] == 2) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 164.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($_GET['res']) && is_array($_GET['res'])) {
$res = array_count_values($_GET['res']);
if ($res['FAILURE'] > 0) {
echo '<br>';
if ($res['FAILURE'] == 2) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 164.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function determineMailsToSend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function determineMailsToSend() {
$this->mailQueue = [];
// check for IDP_EXISTS_BUT_NO_DATABASE
if (!in_array(AbstractTest::INFRA_NONEXISTENTREALM, $this->possibleFailureReasons) && $this->additionalFindings[AbstractTest::INFRA_NONEXISTENTREALM]['DATABASE_STATUS']['ID2'] < 0) {
$this->mailQueue[] = Logopath::IDP_EXISTS_BUT_NO_DATABASE;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collectClients
has 95 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function collectClients()
{
$clientstest = [];
foreach ($this->allReachabilityResults['clients'] as $clients) {
if ($clients->result == RADIUSTests::RETVAL_SKIPPED) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (count(\config\ConfAssistant::CONSORTIUM['interworking-consortium-oi']) > 0) {
$consortiumlist = "";
foreach (\config\ConfAssistant::CONSORTIUM['interworking-consortium-oi'] as $oi) {
$consortiumlist .= ", '<strong>" . $oi . "</strong>'";
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 158.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (count(\config\ConfAssistant::CONSORTIUM['ssid']) > 0) {
$ssidlist = "";
foreach (\config\ConfAssistant::CONSORTIUM['ssid'] as $ssid) {
$ssidlist .= ", '<strong>" . $ssid . "</strong>'";
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 158.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File radius_tests.php
has 323 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
/*
* *****************************************************************************
* Contributions to this work were made on behalf of the GÉANT project, a
Function infoblock
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function infoblock(array $optionlist, string $class, string $level) {
\core\common\Entity::intoThePotatoes();
$locationMarkers = [];
$retval = "";
$optioninfo = \core\Options::instance();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __get_username_password_atomic
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __get_username_password_atomic(self) -> None:
"""
use single form to get username, password and password confirmation
"""
output_fields_separator = "\n\n\n\n\n"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __process_p12
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __process_p12(self) -> bool:
debug('process_p12')
pfx_file = get_config_path() + '/cat_installer/user.p12'
if CRYPTO_AVAILABLE:
debug("using crypto")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($userAuthData as $oneRecord) {
echo "<tr class='".($oneRecord['result'] == "OK" ? "auth-success" : "auth-fail" )."'>"
. "<td>".$oneRecord['activity_time']."</td>"
// $oneRecord['CN'] is a simple string, not an array, so disable Scrutinizer type check here
. "<td>".$oneRecord['realm']."</td>"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 155.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
foreach ($userAuthData as $oneRecord) {
echo "<tr class='".($oneRecord['result'] == "OK" ? "auth-success" : "auth-fail" )."'>"
. "<td>".$oneRecord['activity_time']."</td>"
. "<td>".$oneRecord['realm']."</td>"
. "<td>".$oneRecord['mac']."</td>"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 155.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method printOverview
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function printOverview()
{
$out = [];
$out[] = "<fieldset class='option_container'>
<legend>
Function printStatic
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function printStatic()
{
$out = [];
$out[] = '<fieldset class="option_container" id="static_tests">
<legend><strong>';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method adminInvitationMail
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static function adminInvitationMail($targets, $introtext, $newtoken, $idpPrettyName, $federation, $type)
{
if (!in_array($introtext, OutsideComm::INVITE_CONTEXTS)) {
throw new \Exception("Unknown invite mode!");
}
Method listDevices
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function listDevices()
{
$returnarray = [];
$redirect = $this->getAttributes("device-specific:redirect"); // this might return per-device ones or the general one
// if it was a general one, we are done. Find out if there is one such
SanityTests
has 29 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class SanityTests extends CAT
{
/* in this section set current CAT requirements */
/**