Sign upLogin

IBM-Swift/Kitura

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 850 of 850 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("post", path: "/bodytest", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertNotNil(response?.headers["Date"], "There was No Date header in the response")
                do {
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 315..330
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 349..364

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 134.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        delete(route) { request, response, next in
            Log.verbose("Received DELETE type-safe request with Query Parameters")
            Log.verbose("Query Parameters: \(request.queryParameters)")
            do {
                var query: Q? = nil
Severity: Major
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift on lines 494..509
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift on lines 515..531

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 134.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("post", path: "/bodytestMultiValue", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertNotNil(response?.headers["Date"], "There was No Date header in the response")
                do {
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 315..330
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 332..347

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 134.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("post", path: "/bodytest", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertNotNil(response?.headers["Date"], "There was No Date header in the response")
                do {
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 332..347
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 349..364

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 134.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        get(route) { request, response, next in
            Log.verbose("Received GET (singular) type-safe request with Query Parameters")
            Log.verbose("Query Parameters: \(request.queryParameters)")
            // Define result handler
            do {
Severity: Major
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift on lines 494..509
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift on lines 597..612

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 134.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path: "/download", callback: { response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.headers["Content-Type"]?.first, "text/html", "Wrong Content-Type header")
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 984..997

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 132.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path: "/lifecycle", callback: { response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.headers["x-lifecycle"]?.first, "kitura", "Wrong lifecycle header")
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 1093..1107

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 132.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        delete(appendId(path: route)) { request, response, next in
            Log.verbose("Received DELETE (singular with middleware) type-safe request")
            self.handleMiddleware(T1.self, T2.self, request: request, response: response) { typeSafeMiddleware1, typeSafeMiddleware2 in
                guard let typeSafeMiddleware1 = typeSafeMiddleware1, let typeSafeMiddleware2 = typeSafeMiddleware2 else {
                    return next()
Severity: Major
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift on lines 321..332

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 132.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        get(appendId(path: route)) { request, response, next in
            Log.verbose("Received GET (singular with identifier and middleware) type-safe request")
            self.handleMiddleware(T1.self, T2.self, request: request, response: response) { typeSafeMiddleware1, typeSafeMiddleware2 in
                guard let typeSafeMiddleware1 = typeSafeMiddleware1, let typeSafeMiddleware2 = typeSafeMiddleware2 else {
                    return next()
Severity: Major
Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter+TypeSafeMiddleware.swift on lines 1111..1122

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 132.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    func testSimpleResponse() {
        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path:"/qwer", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestBridgingHTTPStatusCode.swift on lines 43..59
Tests/KituraTests/TestSubrouter.swift on lines 136..152

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 131.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    func testSimpleResponse() {
        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path:"/qwer", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestBridgingHTTPStatusCode.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 89..105
Tests/KituraTests/TestSubrouter.swift on lines 136..152

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 131.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    func testMultipleMiddleware() {
        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path:"/middle/sub1", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
Severity: Major
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestSubrouter.swift and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
Tests/KituraTests/TestBridgingHTTPStatusCode.swift on lines 43..59
Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift on lines 89..105

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 131.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function testPostRequestUrlEncoded has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    func testPostRequestUrlEncoded() {
        performServerTest(router) { expectation in
            self.performRequest("post", path: "/bodytest", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertNotNil(response?.headers["Date"], "There was No Date header in the response")
Severity: Minor
Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestResponse.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Function testCookieFromServer has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        func testCookieFromServer() {
        performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path: "/1/sendcookie", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "/1/sendcookie route did not match single path request")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestCookies.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function testFileServer has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        func testFileServer() {
        performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
            self.performRequest("get", path:"/qwer", callback: {response in
                XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
                XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestStaticFileServer.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function testSimplePaths has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        func testSimplePaths() {
        var router = Router()

        router.all("", handler: handler)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestRouteRegex.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function testSimpleMatches has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        func testSimpleMatches() {
        var router = Router()

        router.all("/test", handler: handler)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Tests/KituraTests/TestRouteRegex.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function constructTupleArrayOutResultHandler has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static func constructTupleArrayOutResultHandler<Id: Identifier, OutputType: Codable>(successStatus: HTTPStatusCode = .OK, response: RouterResponse, completion: @escaping () -> Void) -> IdentifierCodableArrayResultClosure<Id, OutputType> {
        return { codableOutput, error in
            var status = successStatus
            if let error = error {
                status = httpStatusCode(from: error)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function startUnixSocketServer has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        private func startUnixSocketServer(router: ServerDelegate, options: ServerOptions?) -> String? {
        // Servers with options (live for duration of one test)
        if (options != nil) {
            let server = doStartUnixSocketServer(router: router, options: options)
            return server?.unixDomainSocketPath
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Tests/KituraTests/KituraTest.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function constructOutResultHandler has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static func constructOutResultHandler<OutputType: Codable>(successStatus: HTTPStatusCode = .OK, response: RouterResponse, completion: @escaping () -> Void) -> CodableResultClosure<OutputType> {
        return { codableOutput, error in
            var status = successStatus
            if let error = error {
                status = httpStatusCode(from: error)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in Sources/Kitura/CodableRouter.swift - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language