Showing 244 of 244 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(id+':not(.ac_input)')
.bind( "keydown", function( event ) { // don't navigate away from the field on tab when selecting an item
if ( event.keyCode === $.ui.keyCode.TAB &&
$( this ).data( "autocomplete" ).menu.active ) {
event.preventDefault();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$('input[name=predecessor_input]:not(.ac_input)')
.bind( "keydown", function( event ) { // don't navigate away from the field on tab when selecting an item
if ( event.keyCode === $.ui.keyCode.TAB &&
$( this ).data( "autocomplete" ).menu.active ) {
event.preventDefault();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method postTodo
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def postTodo(l, options = {})
uri = URI.parse(GTD_URI_TODOS)
http = Net::HTTP.new(uri.host, uri.port)
if uri.scheme == "https" # enable SSL/TLS
Method empty_container_msg_div_id
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def empty_container_msg_div_id(todo = @todo || @successor)
raise Exception.new, "no @todo or @successor set" if !todo
source_view do |page|
page.project {
Method determine_remaining_in_context_count
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def determine_remaining_in_context_count(context_id = @todo.context_id)
source_view do |from|
from.deferred {
# force reload to todos to get correct count and not a cached one
@remaining_in_context = current_user.contexts.find(context_id).todos.deferred_or_blocked.count
Function setup_behavior
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup_behavior: function() {
/* toggle new todo form for single todo */
$('#toggle_action_new').click(function(){
if ($("#todo_multi_add").is(':visible')) { /* hide multi next action form first */
$('#todo_new_action').show();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
@projects = current_user.projects.active
@contexts = current_user.contexts
respond_to do |format|
format.m {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document).on("click","#recurring_period input", function(){
RecurringTodosPage.hide_all_recurring();
$('#recurring_'+this.id.split('_')[4]).show();
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document).on("click","#recurring_edit_period input", function(){
RecurringTodosPage.hide_all_edit_recurring();
$('#recurring_edit_'+this.id.split('_')[5]).show();
});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method show_selected_actions_from_chart
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show_selected_actions_from_chart
@page_title = t('stats.action_selection_title')
@count = 99
@source_view = 'stats'
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
set_state_container_visibility: function (state, set_visible) {
if (set_visible) {
$('#list-'+state+'-projects-container').slideDown("fast");
} else {
$('#list-'+state+'-projects-container').slideUp("fast");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
set_state_container_visibility: function (state, set_visible) {
if (set_visible) {
$('#list-'+state+'-contexts-container').slideDown("fast");
} else {
$('#list-'+state+'-contexts-container').slideUp("fast");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function setup_autocomplete_for_predecessor
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup_autocomplete_for_predecessor: function() {
$('input[name=predecessor_input]:not(.ac_input)')
.bind( "keydown", function( event ) { // don't navigate away from the field on tab when selecting an item
if ( event.keyCode === $.ui.keyCode.TAB &&
$( this ).data( "autocomplete" ).menu.active ) {
Function setup_behavior
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup_behavior: function() {
/* toggle new todo form for single todo */
$('#toggle_action_new').click(function(){
if ($("#todo_multi_add").is(':visible')) { /* hide multi next action form first */
$('#todo_new_action').show();
Method calendar
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calendar
@source_view = params['_source_view'] || 'calendar'
@page_title = t('todos.calendar_page_title')
@projects = current_user.projects
Method show_selected_actions_from_chart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show_selected_actions_from_chart
@page_title = t('stats.action_selection_title')
@count = 99
@source_view = 'stats'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_xth_day_of_month
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_xth_day_of_month(x, weekday, month, year)
if x == 5
# last -> count backwards. use UTC to avoid strange timezone oddities
# where last_day -= 1.day seems to shift tz+0100 to tz+0000
last_day = Time.utc(year, month, Time.days_in_month(month))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setup_autocomplete_for_tag_list
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup_autocomplete_for_tag_list: function(id) {
$(id+':not(.ac_input)')
.bind( "keydown", function( event ) { // don't navigate away from the field on tab when selecting an item
if ( event.keyCode === $.ui.keyCode.TAB &&
$( this ).data( "autocomplete" ).menu.active ) {
Method show
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
@max_completed = current_user.prefs.show_number_completed
init_data_for_sidebar unless mobile?
@page_title = t('projects.page_title', :project => @project.name)
Method get_stats_tags
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_stats_tags
# tag cloud code inspired by this article
# http://www.juixe.com/techknow/index.php/2006/07/15/acts-as-taggable-tag-cloud/
levels=10