Showing 21 of 27 total issues
File page-tree-builder.spec.ts
has 314 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { isString, noop, omit } from 'lodash';
import { Class } from 'type-fest';
import { DeclarationReflection, LogLevel, ProjectReflection, Reflection, ReflectionKind, SourceReference, normalizePath } from 'typedoc';
import { resolve } from '@knodes/typedoc-pluginutils/path';
File monorepo.spec.ts
has 308 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { resolve } from '@knodes/typedoc-pluginutils/path';
import { describeDocsFile, formatHtml, getBreadcrumb, runPluginBeforeAll } from '#plugintestbed';
import { elementMatcher, menuItemMatcher } from '../helpers';
Function spawn
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const spawn = ( cmd, args, opts = {} ) => new Promise( ( res, rej ) => {
const { stdio } = opts;
if( !opts.stdio ){
opts.stdio = [ null, process.stdout, process.stderr ];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mockPlugin
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const mockPlugin = <T extends ABasePlugin = ABasePlugin>( props: Partial<MockPlugin<T>> = {} ): MockPlugin<T> => {
const mockLogger = {
makeChildLogger: jest.fn(),
error: jest.fn().mockImplementation( v => assert.fail( `Unexpected error log: ${typeof v === 'function' ? v() : v}` ) ),
warn: jest.fn().mockImplementation( v => assert.fail( `Unexpected warn log: ${typeof v === 'function' ? v() : v}` ) ),
Function setupCaptureEvent
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const setupCaptureEvent = <T extends EventDispatcher>( cls: Class<T>, eventName: string ) => {
let listenerToTest: CallableFunction[] = [];
let baseOn: EventDispatcher['on'];
function registerEvent( eventMap: EventMap ): T;
function registerEvent( eventMap: EventMap, callback?: EventCallback ): T;
Function _onRendererBeginPageAlterModel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _onRendererBeginPageAlterModel( pageEvent: PageEvent<any> ) {
if( pageEvent.model instanceof ANodeReflection ){
const newModel = this._nodeDeclarationMappingCache.get( pageEvent.model );
assert( newModel );
this._addRestore( () => newModel.children, v => newModel.children = v );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _onRendererBeginPageAlterModel
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _onRendererBeginPageAlterModel( pageEvent: PageEvent<any> ) {
if( pageEvent.model instanceof ANodeReflection ){
const newModel = this._nodeDeclarationMappingCache.get( pageEvent.model );
assert( newModel );
this._addRestore( () => newModel.children, v => newModel.children = v );
Function spawn
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const spawn = ( cmd, args, opts = {} ) => new Promise( ( res, rej ) => {
const { stdio } = opts;
if( !opts.stdio ){
opts.stdio = [ null, process.stdout, process.stderr ];
}
Function buildPagesTree
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public buildPagesTree( project: ProjectReflection, options: IPluginOptions ): MenuReflection {
const rootMenu = new MenuReflection( 'ROOT', project, undefined, '' );
if( !options.pages || options.pages.length === 0 ){
return rootMenu;
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _mapNodeToReflection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _mapNodeToReflection( node: PageNode, parent: ANodeReflection.Parent, io: IIOPath ): NodeReflection[] {
const childrenIO: IIOPath = isModuleRoot( node ) ? { ...io } : {
...io,
input: join( io.input, getDir( node, 'source' ) ),
output: join( io.output, getDir( node, 'output' ) ),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _mapNodeToReflection
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _mapNodeToReflection( node: PageNode, parent: ANodeReflection.Parent, io: IIOPath ): NodeReflection[] {
const childrenIO: IIOPath = isModuleRoot( node ) ? { ...io } : {
...io,
input: join( io.input, getDir( node, 'source' ) ),
output: join( io.output, getDir( node, 'output' ) ),
Function _replaceCodeBlock
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _replaceCodeBlock( match: MarkdownReplacer.Match, sourceHint: MarkdownReplacer.SourceHint ) {
// Avoid recursion in code blocks
if( this._currentPageMemo.currentReflection instanceof DeclarationReflection && this._currentPageMemo.currentReflection.kind === CODEBLOCK_KIND ){
return undefined;
}
Function setupMockPageMemo
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const setupMockPageMemo = () => {
const capture = setupCaptureEvent( Renderer, PageEvent.BEGIN );
return {
captureEventRegistration: capture.captureEventRegistration,
setCurrentPage: <T extends Reflection>(
Function _getNodeReflection
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _getNodeReflection( node: PageNode, parent: ANodeReflection.Parent, io: IIOPath ){
const { module, parent: actualParent } = this._getNodeParent( node, parent );
if( node.source ){
const nodePath = join( io.input, node.source );
const sourceFilePath = miscUtils.catchWrap(
Function mockPlugin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const mockPlugin = <T extends ABasePlugin = ABasePlugin>( props: Partial<MockPlugin<T>> = {} ): MockPlugin<T> => {
const mockLogger = {
makeChildLogger: jest.fn(),
error: jest.fn().mockImplementation( v => assert.fail( `Unexpected error log: ${typeof v === 'function' ? v() : v}` ) ),
warn: jest.fn().mockImplementation( v => assert.fail( `Unexpected warn log: ${typeof v === 'function' ? v() : v}` ) ),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function buildOptions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const buildOptions = ( plugin: PagesPlugin ) => OptionGroup.factory<IPluginOptions>( plugin )
.add( 'enablePageLinks', {
help: 'Whether or not @page and @pagelink tags should be parsed.',
type: ParameterType.Boolean,
defaultValue: true,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function wrapPageError
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const wrapPageError = ( path: string[], index: number ) => ( err: any ) => {
if( err instanceof AssertionError ){
const pathStr = path.length > 0 ? ` in ${path.map( p => JSON.stringify( p ) ).join( ' ⇒ ' )}` : '';
return new Error( `Invalid page${pathStr} @ index ${index}: ${err.message ?? err}`, { cause: err } );
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _onRendererBeginPageAlterNavigation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _onRendererBeginPageAlterNavigation( pageEvent: PageEvent<any> ) {
this._addRestore( () => pageEvent.project.children, prev => pageEvent.project.children = prev );
const modelModule = getReflectionModule( pageEvent.model );
const projectPages = this._modulesPages.find( p => p.module === pageEvent.project );
pageEvent.project.children = [
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _setValueFromObject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private _setValueFromObject( value: OptionGroupSetValue<TDeclarations> ){
const valKeys = Object.keys( value );
const optKeys = Object.keys( this._options );
for( const unknownOption of difference( valKeys, optKeys ) ){
this.plugin.logger.warn( `Unknown option "${unknownOption}". Did you mean "${closest( unknownOption, optKeys )}" ?` );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function matchReflection
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const matchReflection = <T extends Reflection>( proto: Class<T>, sample: Partial<T> ) => expect.toSatisfy( v => {
expect( v ).toBeInstanceOf( proto );
const s = sample as any;
if( 'sourceFilePath' in s && isString( s.sourceFilePath ) ){
s.sourceFilePath = normalizePath( resolve( s.sourceFilePath ) );
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"