Showing 18,390 of 18,390 total issues
Function createSchema
has 197 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const createSchema = (initialValues = {}, edit, promise, classOptions) => {
const edit_field = [
{
component: componentTypes.SUB_FORM,
name: 'file_section',
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method button_set_form_vars
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def button_set_form_vars
@sb[:buttons_node] = true
@edit = {}
if session[:resolve] && session[:resolve][:instance_name]
@resolve = session[:resolve]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method edit_reports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def edit_reports
@edit[:selected_reports] = []
current_group_id = current_user.current_group.try(:id).to_i
id = session[:node_selected].split('__')
@selected = id[1].split(':')
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_tabs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_tabs
@sb[:miq_tab] = params[:tab]
active_tab = 'edit_1'
case @sb[:miq_tab].split('_')[1]
when '8'
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File miq_alert_controller.rb
has 632 lines of code (exceeds 400 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MiqAlertController < ApplicationController
before_action :check_privileges
before_action :get_session_data
after_action :cleanup_action
after_action :set_session_data
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function retirementTabSchema
has 189 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const retirementTabSchema = (
repositories,
setData,
retirementRepositoryId,
currentRegion,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function provisionTabSchema
has 189 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const provisionTabSchema = (
repositories,
setData,
provisionRepositoryId,
currentRegion,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cyclomatic complexity for get_view is too high. [61/11] Open
def get_view(db, options = {}, fetch_data = false)
if !fetch_data && @report_data_additional_options.nil?
process_show_list_options(options, db)
end
if @in_a_form && @edit.present?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Method build_grid
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_grid
case @edit[:wf]
when MiqProvisionConfiguredSystemWorkflow
build_dialog_page_miq_provision_configured_system_workflow
when MiqProvisionVirtWorkflow
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const cancelDeleteDisk = (row, data, setData) => {
const submitDisks = data.submitParams.disks.delete.filter((disk) => disk.id !== row.id);
const deletedDiskIds = data.submitParams.diskIds.delete.filter((id) => id !== row.id);
data.changeCounter -= 1;
setData({
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 183.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const cancelDeleteNetwork = (row, data, setData) => {
const deleteNetworksData = data.submitParams.networks.delete.filter((network) => network.id !== row.id);
const deletedNetworkIds = data.submitParams.networkIds.delete.filter((id) => id !== row.id);
data.changeCounter -= 1;
setData({
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 183.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Cyclomatic complexity for replace_right_cell is too high. [60/11] Open
def replace_right_cell(options = {})
if params[:action] == 'x_history'
# Making selected checkboxes array empty when compare cancel is clicked
params[:miq_grid_checks] = []
end
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
API.post(url, { action: 'verify_credentials', resource: updatedResource }).then(({ results: [result] = [], ...single }) => {
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase
const { task_id, success } = result || single;
// The request here can either create a background task or fail
return success ? API.wait_for_task(task_id) : Promise.reject(result);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 182.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
API.post(url, { action: 'verify_credentials', resource }).then(({ results: [result] = [], ...single }) => {
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase
const { task_id, success } = result || single;
// The request here can either create a background task or fail
return success ? API.wait_for_task(task_id) : Promise.reject(result);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 182.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method ap_get_form_vars
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ap_get_form_vars
@scan = @edit[:scan_id] ? ScanItemSet.find(@edit[:scan_id]) : ScanItemSet.new
@edit[:new][:name] = params[:name] if params[:name]
@edit[:new][:description] = params[:description] if params[:description]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_child_vms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_child_vms(model, node_id, title, show_list)
options = {
:model => model,
:named_scope => scopes_for_role,
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method action_field_changed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def action_field_changed
return unless load_edit("miq_action_edit__#{params[:id]}")
@action = @edit[:action_id] ? MiqAction.find(@edit[:action_id]) : MiqAction.new
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_from_expression_editor
has 176 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_from_expression_editor(params)
if params[:chosen_typ] && params[:chosen_typ] != exp_typ
change_exp_typ(params[:chosen_typ])
else
case exp_typ
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function actionsToFunction
has 173 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
actionsToFunction: function() {
var startEnd = function(pageNumber) {
var start = (pageNumber - 1) * this.settings.perpage;
var end = start + this.settings.perpage;
return {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function processReplaceRightCell
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ManageIQ.explorer.processReplaceRightCell = function(data) {
/* variables for the expression editor */
if (_.isObject(data.expEditor)) {
if (_.isObject(data.expEditor.first)) {
if (!_.isUndefined(data.expEditor.first.type)) {
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"