SciRuby/statsample

View on GitHub

Showing 133 of 133 total issues

Method increment has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def increment(x, w=1)
      if x.respond_to? :each
        x.each{|y| increment(y,w) }
      elsif x.is_a? Numeric
        (range.size - 1).times do |i|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/histogram.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          pan.rule do
            data y.ticks
            bottom y
            stroke_style {|d| d!=0 ? "#eee" : "#000"}
            label(:anchor=>'left') do
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/graph/scatterplot.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
lib/statsample/graph/scatterplot.rb on lines 157..163

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 38.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          pan.rule do
            data x.ticks
            left x
            stroke_style {|d| d!=0 ? "#eee" : "#000"}
            label(:anchor=>'bottom') do
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/graph/scatterplot.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
lib/statsample/graph/scatterplot.rb on lines 146..152

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 38.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method mean_confidence_interval_t has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def mean_confidence_interval_t(mean,s,n_sample,n_population,margin=0.95)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/srs.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Method mean_confidence_interval has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def mean_confidence_interval(mean,s,n_sample,n_population,x)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/statsample/srs.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Method mean_confidence_interval_z has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def mean_confidence_interval_z(mean,s,n_sample,n_population,margin=0.95)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/statsample/srs.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def initialize(matrix, opts=Hash.new)
              @matrix=matrix
              if @matrix.respond_to? :fields
                @fields=@matrix.fields
              else
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/factor/principalaxis.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method correlation_matrix_pairwise has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def correlation_matrix_pairwise(ds)
                cache={}
                vectors = ds.vectors.to_a
                cm = vectors.collect do |row|
                  vectors.collect do |col|
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method covariance_matrix_pairwise has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def covariance_matrix_pairwise(ds)
                cache={}
                vectors = ds.vectors.to_a
                mat_rows = vectors.collect do |row|
                  vectors.collect do |col|
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method report_building has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def report_building(builder) # :nodoc:
                builder.section(:name=>@name) do |s|
                  if summary_descriptives
                    s.table(:name=>_("Descriptives"),:header=>%w{Name N Mean SD Min Max}.map {|v| _(v)}) do |t|
                      @vectors.each do |v|
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/anova/oneway.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method correlation has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def correlation
              if(_type==:covariance)
                matrix=Matrix.rows(row_size.times.collect { |i|
                  column_size.times.collect { |j|
                    if i==j
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/matrix.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method variable_definition has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                    def variable_definition(carrier,v,name,nickname=nil)
                        nickname = (nickname.nil? ? "" : "nickname=\"#{nickname}\"" )
                        if v.type==:object or v.to_a.find {|d|  d.is_a? String }
                            carrier.categorials.push(name)
                            carrier.conversions[name]={}
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/converters.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method residuals has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def residuals
                  Daru::Vector.new(
                    (0...@total_cases).collect do |i|
                      invalid=false
                      vect=@dep_columns.collect{|v| invalid=true if v[i].nil?; v[i]}
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/regression/multiple/baseengine.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                  @ss_a = opts.delete :ss_a
                  @ss_b = opts.delete :ss_b
                  @ss_axb = opts.delete :ss_axb
                  @ss_within = opts.delete :ss_within
                  
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/anova/twoway.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/anova/twoway.rb on lines 45..53

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 33.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                  @ms_a = opts.delete :ms_a
                  @ms_b = opts.delete :ms_b
                  @ms_axb = opts.delete :ms_axb
                  @ms_within = opts.delete :ms_within
                  
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/anova/twoway.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/anova/twoway.rb on lines 34..42

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 33.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                vd=(n-1)*(k**2)*(pp**2)*(fj**2)+((n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 298..298
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 342..342

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 32.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                vd=(n-1)*(k**2)*(pp**2)*(fj**2)+((n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 285..285
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 342..342

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 32.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                vd=(n-1)*(k**2)*(pp**2)*(fj**2)+((n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 285..285
        lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 298..298

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 32.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def covariance(v1,v2)
                v1a,v2a=Statsample.only_valid_clone(v1,v2)
        
                return nil if v1a.size==0
                if Statsample.has_gsl?
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/bivariate.rb on lines 46..52

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 31.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def pearson(v1,v2)
                v1a,v2a=Statsample.only_valid_clone(v1,v2)
                return nil if v1a.size ==0
                if Statsample.has_gsl?
                  GSL::Stats::correlation(v1a.to_gsl, v2a.to_gsl)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/statsample/bivariate.rb on lines 13..20

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 31.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language