Sign upLogin

SciRuby/statsample

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 133 of 133 total issues

Method union has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def union(&block)
      union_field={}
      types={}
      names={}
      labels={}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/multiset.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method psi has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def psi
        if @psi.nil?
          c(@c) if @c
          c_by_index(@c1,@c2) if (@c1 and @c2)
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/anova/contrast.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_has_library has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.create_has_library(library)
    define_singleton_method("has_#{library}?") do
      cv = "@@#{library}"
      unless class_variable_defined? cv
        begin
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(ds,y_var, opts=Hash.new)
        @ds    = ds
        @y_var = y_var.respond_to?(:to_sym) ? y_var.to_sym : y_var
        @n     = ds.nrows
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/dominanceanalysis/bootstrap.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method min_n_valid has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def min_n_valid(ds)
        min = ds.nrows
        m   = n_valid_matrix(ds)
        for x in 0...m.row_size
          for y in 0...m.column_size
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_hash has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def create_hash(dataset, vectors, sep=Statsample::SPLIT_TOKEN)
        raise ArgumentError,"Array should't be empty" if vectors.size==0
        pro_hash = vectors.inject({}) do |h,v_name|
          v_name = v_name.is_a?(Numeric) ? v_name : v_name.to_sym
          raise Exception, "Vector #{v_name} doesn't exists on Dataset" if
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/codification.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        vn=(k-1)*(n-1)*((k*pp*fj+n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 297..297
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 341..341

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(p1, min_max=false, opts=Hash.new)
      
      if p1.is_a? Array
        range=p1
        @n_bins=p1.size-1
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/histogram.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method report_building has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def report_building(generator)
      iterate if @clean
      generator.section(:name=>@name) do |s|
        s.text _("Number of factors: %d") % m
        s.text _("Iterations: %d") % @iterations
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/factor/principalaxis.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(opts=Hash.new, &block)
        @scales=Hash.new
        @scales_keys=Array.new
        opts_default={  :name=>_("Multiple Scale analysis"),
                        :summary_correlation_matrix=>false,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/reliability/multiscaleanalysis.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        vn=(k-1)*(n-1)*((k*pp*fj+n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 284..284
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 297..297

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method multiple has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def self.multiple(ds,y_var, opts=Hash.new)
        missing_data= (opts[:missing_data].nil? ) ? :listwise : opts.delete(:missing_data)
        if missing_data==:pairwise
           Statsample::Regression::Multiple::RubyEngine.new(ds,y_var, opts)
        else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/regression.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method predicted has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def predicted
          Daru::Vector.new(
            @total_cases.times.collect do |i|
              invalid = false
              vect = @dep_columns.collect {|v| invalid = true if v[i].nil?; v[i]}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/regression/multiple/baseengine.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method report_building has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def report_building(generator)
      @name||= (_type==:correlation ? _("Correlation"):_("Covariance"))+_(" Matrix")
      generator.table(:name=>@name, :header=>[""]+fields_y) do |t|
        row_size.times {|i|
          t.row([fields_x[i]]+row(i).to_a.collect {|i1|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/matrix.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method ssr_direct has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def ssr_direct
          mean=@dy.mean
          cases=0
          ssr=(0...@ds.cases).inject(0) {|a,i|
            invalid=false
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/regression/multiple/baseengine.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        vn=(k-1)*(n-1)*((k*pp*fj+n*(1+(k-1)*pp)-k*pp)**2)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 284..284
lib/statsample/reliability/icc.rb on lines 341..341

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 30.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def frequencies_by_row
    f=frequencies
    rows_names.inject({}){|sr,row|
      sr[row]=cols_names.inject({}) {|sc,col| sc[col]=f[[row,col]]; sc}
      sr
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/crosstab.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/statsample/crosstab.rb on lines 62..66

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def frequencies_by_col
      f=frequencies
      cols_names.inject({}){|sc,col| 
        sc[col]=rows_names.inject({}) {|sr,row| sr[row]=f[[row,col]]; sr}
        sc
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/crosstab.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/statsample/crosstab.rb on lines 55..59

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

              if cache[[col,row]].nil?
                r=pearson(ds[row],ds[col])
                cache[[row,col]]=r
                r
              else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/statsample/bivariate.rb on lines 183..188

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

              if cache[[col,row]].nil?
                cov=covariance(ds[row],ds[col])
                cache[[row,col]]=cov
                cov
              else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/statsample/bivariate.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
lib/statsample/bivariate.rb on lines 231..236

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 28.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language