Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

File jsep.js has 469 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

//     JavaScript Expression Parser (JSEP) 0.3.1
//     JSEP may be freely distributed under the MIT License
//     http://jsep.from.so/

/*global module: true, exports: true, console: true */
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-lib/jsep/0_3_1/debug/js/jsep.js - About 7 hrs to fix

Method refreshFKs has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static void refreshFKs(final String tableName, final boolean dropOnly) {
        // Foreign Keys setzen, ACHTUNG: immer checken, wenn ein Fehler auftritt
        ResultSet rs = DBKernel.getResultSet("SELECT TABLE_NAME, CONSTRAINT_NAME, CONSTRAINT_TYPE FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS", false);
        try {
            if (rs != null && rs.first()) {
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/UpdateChecker.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getUsersFromChangeLog has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static LinkedHashMap<Integer, Vector<String>> getUsersFromChangeLog(final Statement anfrage, final String tablename, final Integer tableID, final String username,
            final boolean showDeletedAsWell) {
        LinkedHashMap<Integer, Vector<String>> result = new LinkedHashMap<>();
        Vector<String> entries = new Vector<>();
        String sql = "SELECT " + delimitL("TabellenID") + "," + delimitL("Username") + "," + delimitL("Zeitstempel") + "," + delimitL(tablename) + "." + delimitL("ID") + " AS "
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/DBKernel.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method closeDBConnections has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static boolean closeDBConnections(final boolean kompakt) {
        if (DBKernel.myDBi != null && DBKernel.myDBi.getConn() != null) return DBKernel.myDBi.closeDBConnections(kompakt);
        boolean result = true;
        try {
            if (localConn != null && !localConn.isClosed()) {
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/DBKernel.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getFunctionErrors has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public double[][] getFunctionErrors(String paramX, String paramY,
            String unitX, String unitY, String transformX, String transformY,
            double minX, double maxX, double minY, double maxY,
            Map<String, Integer> choice) throws ConvertException {
        if (function == null) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/chart/Plotable.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void updateAgentPanel() {
        agentButtons.clear();
        agentBox = new JComboBox<>(new String[] { DO_NOT_USE, OTHER_PARAMETER });
        agentButton = new JButton(OTHER_PARAMETER);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java on lines 689..757

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 445.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void updateMatrixPanel() {
        matrixButtons.clear();
        matrixBox = new JComboBox<>(new String[] { DO_NOT_USE, OTHER_PARAMETER });
        matrixButton = new JButton(OTHER_PARAMETER);
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/xlstimeseriesreader/XLSTimeSeriesReaderNodeDialog.java on lines 618..687

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 445.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

MyNewDoubleEditor has 51 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public class MyNewDoubleEditor extends JDialog {

    /**
     * 
     */
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/dbtable/editoren/MyNewDoubleEditor.java - About 7 hrs to fix

MyDBI has 51 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public abstract class MyDBI {
    public abstract LinkedHashMap<String, MyTable> getAllTables();

    public abstract LinkedHashMap<Integer, String> getTreeStructure();
Severity: Major
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/MyDBI.java - About 7 hrs to fix

File TableReader.java has 462 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*******************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2015 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelselectiontertiary/TableReader.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Method setValue has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void setValue(Object value) {
        String sql = "";
        String result = "";
        if (value == null) {
            this.setText("");
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/dbtable/editoren/MyMNRenderer.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method createBufferedDataTable has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public BufferedDataTable createBufferedDataTable(final ExecutionContext exec) {
        DataTableSpec spec = m_spec.createDataTableSpec();
        BufferedDataContainer container = exec.createDataContainer(spec);
        for (JSONDataTableRow row : m_rows) {
            DataCell[] dataCells = new DataCell[row.getData().length];
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.internal.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/node/editableTable/JSONDataTable.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    hooks: {
      "#": cppHook,
      "*": pointerHook,
      "u": cpp11StringHook,
      "U": cpp11StringHook,
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/clike/clike.js and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/clike/clike.js on lines 812..836

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (nodeName === "input") {
            target.disabled = false;
            inst.trigger.filter("button").
                each(function() { this.disabled = false; }).end().
                filter("img").css({opacity: "1.0", cursor: ""});
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js on lines 8416..8426

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    hooks: {
      "#": cppHook,
      "*": pointerHook,
      "u": cpp11StringHook,
      "U": cpp11StringHook,
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/clike/clike.js and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/clike/clike.js on lines 451..475

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (nodeName === "input") {
            target.disabled = true;
            inst.trigger.filter("button").
                each(function() { this.disabled = true; }).end().
                filter("img").css({opacity: "0.5", cursor: "default"});
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js on lines 8388..8398

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

File ManualModelConfNodeModel.java has 459 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*******************************************************************************
 * Copyright (c) 2015 Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Germany
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/manualmodelconf/ManualModelConfNodeModel.java - About 7 hrs to fix

SettingsHelper has 50 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public class SettingsHelper {

    protected static final String CFG_SELECTEDIDS = "SelectedIDs";
    protected static final String CFG_COLORS = "Colors";
    protected static final String CFG_SHAPES = "Shapes";
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/modelselectiontertiary/SettingsHelper.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Method computePrimary has 175 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static List<KnimeTuple> computePrimary(List<KnimeTuple> tuples,
            boolean perDataSet) {
        Map<String, KnimeTuple> tupleMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
        Map<String, Set<Integer>> usedCondIDs = new LinkedHashMap<>();
        Map<String, List<Double>> targetValueMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/QualityMeasurementComputation.java - About 7 hrs to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    _over: function( event ) {

        var draggable = $.ui.ddmanager.current;

        // Bail if draggable and droppable are same element
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js and 1 other location - About 7 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js on lines 2811..2827

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 175.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language