Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Function leftButtonSelect has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  function leftButtonSelect(cm, event, start, behavior) {
    var display = cm.display, doc = cm.doc;
    e_preventDefault(event);

    var ourRange, ourIndex, startSel = doc.sel, ranges = startSel.ranges;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/lib/codemirror.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function defineOptions has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function defineOptions(CodeMirror) {
  var optionHandlers = CodeMirror.optionHandlers

  function option(name, deflt, handle, notOnInit) {
    CodeMirror.defaults[name] = deflt
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-lib/codemirror/codemirror.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function defineOptions has 116 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function defineOptions(CodeMirror) {
  var optionHandlers = CodeMirror.optionHandlers

  function option(name, deflt, handle, notOnInit) {
    CodeMirror.defaults[name] = deflt
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/joiner/fskemfeditor/codemirror.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function tokenBase has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  function tokenBase(stream, state) {
    // String
    var ch = stream.peek();
    if (ch == "'" || ch == '"') {
      stream.next();
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/dylan/dylan.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function _create has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    _create: function() {
        this.element.closest( "form" )
            .unbind( "reset" + this.eventNamespace )
            .bind( "reset" + this.eventNamespace, formResetHandler );
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/jquery-ui.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (o.startDate !== -Infinity){
                if (!!o.startDate){
                    if (o.startDate instanceof Date)
                        o.startDate = this._local_to_utc(this._zero_time(o.startDate));
                    else
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 239..249

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (o.startDate !== -Infinity){
                if (!!o.startDate){
                    if (o.startDate instanceof Date)
                        o.startDate = this._local_to_utc(this._zero_time(o.startDate));
                    else
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/bootstrap-datepicker/1_6_4/debug/js/bootstrap-datepicker.js on lines 234..244

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (x) {
          if (xExtentDomain) {
            x0 = xExtentDomain[0], x1 = xExtentDomain[1];
          } else {
            x0 = xExtent[0], x1 = xExtent[1];
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/d3.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/d3.js on lines 8278..8286

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    _updateSimName() {
        let O = this;
        _log( 'PANEL SIM / _updateSimName' );

        if( O._$simNameInput ) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.simulation.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.simulation.js on lines 759..774

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    _updateSimDescription( $input ) {
        let O = this;
        _log( 'PANEL SIM / _updateSimDescription' );

        if( O._$simDescInput ) {
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.simulation.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.simulation.js on lines 735..750

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (y) {
          if (yExtentDomain) {
            y0 = yExtentDomain[0], y1 = yExtentDomain[1];
          } else {
            y0 = yExtent[0], y1 = yExtent[1];
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/d3.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/js/modelplotter/d3.js on lines 8269..8277

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 127.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerOtherModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method setNodeAnnotation has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void setNodeAnnotation(String newAnnotation, NodeSettingsWO s) {
        long ttt = System.currentTimeMillis();
        Collection<NodeContainer> ncs = WorkflowManager.ROOT.getNodeContainers();
        for (NodeContainer nc : ncs) {
            if (nc instanceof WorkflowManager) {
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.foodprocess/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/foodprocess/FoodProcessNodeDialog.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerConsumptionSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerHealthModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerDataModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerPredictiveModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerToxicologicalSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(K).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerProcessModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerRiskModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language