Sign upLogin

SiLeBAT/FSK-Lab

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 14,752 of 14,752 total issues

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerRiskModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(K).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerDoseResponseSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveParameter has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Parameter retrieveParameter(Row row) {

        // Check first mandatory properties
        if (row.getCell(L).getCellType() == Cell.CELL_TYPE_BLANK) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Missing parameter id");
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/src/metadata/SwaggerQraModelSheetImporter.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method handleSuchfeldChange has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    void handleSuchfeldChange(final KeyEvent e, final boolean doFilter) {
        if (!filterChangeAllowed) return;
        if (isFormVisible()) {
            return;
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/dbtable/MyDBPanel.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method cellValueChanged has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Object cellValueChanged(int row, int col, Object oldValue, Object newValue) {
        //System.out.println(row + "\t" + col + "\t" + oldValue + "\t" + newValue);
        try {
            if (theTable.getMyCellPropertiesModel() instanceof MyCellPropertiesModel) {
                if (theTable.getColumn(col-1).getColumnName().equals("Geprueft") && oldValue == null && newValue != null &&
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/dbtable/MyTableCellListener.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method openNewWindow has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Object openNewWindow(final MyTable theNewTable, final Object value, final Object headerValue, final String mnTable, final String mnID, final MyDBForm dbForm, final JDialog owner) {
        Object result = null;
        String titel = (headerValue == null) ? theNewTable.getTablename() : (DBKernel.getLanguage().equals("en") ? "Choose " + GuiMessages.getString((String) headerValue) + "..." : headerValue + " auswählen...");
        //JDialog f = new JDialog(DBKernel.mainFrame, titel, dbForm != null);
        JDialog f = new JDialog(owner == null ? DBKernel.mainFrame : owner, titel);
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/gui/MainFrame.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method compare has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) {
        String version1 = (String) o1;
        String version2 = (String) o2;

        VersionTokenizer tokenizer1 = new VersionTokenizer(version1);
Severity: Minor
Found in org.hsh.bfr.db/src/org/hsh/bfr/db/VersionComprator.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method updateParametersPanel has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void updateParametersPanel() {
        if (type == NO_PARAMETER_INPUT) {
            return;
        }
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.common/src/de/bund/bfr/knime/pmm/common/chart/ChartConfigPanel.java - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _createFormField has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        _createFormField ( name, mandatory, type, helperText, value, vocabulary, port ) {
            let O = this;
            _log( 'PANEL SIM / _createFormField' );
            _log( name );
Severity: Minor
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/app/app.editable.mt.InputForm.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
    sb.append("class Hazard {\n");
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/de/bund/bfr/metadata/swagger/Hazard.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/de/bund/bfr/metadata/swagger/Reference.java on lines 511..532

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 285.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
    sb.append("class Reference {\n");
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/de/bund/bfr/metadata/swagger/Reference.java and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.metadata.model/gen/de/bund/bfr/metadata/swagger/Hazard.java on lines 357..378

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 285.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function parseDate has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        parseDate: function(date, format, language, assumeNearby){
            if (!date)
                return undefined;
            if (date instanceof Date)
                return date;
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/bootstrap-datepicker.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function leftButtonSelect has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function leftButtonSelect(cm, event, start, behavior) {
  var display = cm.display, doc = cm.doc
  e_preventDefault(event)

  var ourRange, ourIndex, startSel = doc.sel, ranges = startSel.ranges
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-lib/codemirror/codemirror.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function leftButtonSelect has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function leftButtonSelect(cm, event, start, behavior) {
  var display = cm.display, doc = cm.doc
  e_preventDefault(event)

  var ourRange, ourIndex, startSel = doc.sel, ranges = startSel.ranges
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.deprecatednodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/nodes/joiner/fskemfeditor/codemirror.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Function getComponentValue has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  view.getComponentValue = function () {
    if (!isValidModel(_value.joinerModelsData)) {
      _value.joinerModelsData = {
        firstModel: [],
        secondModel: [],
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.fsklab.nodes/js-src/de/bund/bfr/knime/fsklab/v2.0/joiner/joiner.js - About 4 hrs to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  function tokenString(quote) {
    return function(stream, state) {
      var escaped = false, next, end = false;
      while ((next = stream.next()) != null) {
        if (next == quote && !escaped) {end = true; break;}
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js and 3 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/pig/pig.js on lines 46..59
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/verilog/verilog.js on lines 204..215
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js on lines 105..116

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 126.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  function tokenString2(quote) {
    return function(stream, state) {
      var escaped = false, next, end = false;
      while ((next = stream.next()) != null) {
        if (next == quote && !escaped) {end = true; break;}
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js and 3 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/pig/pig.js on lines 46..59
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/verilog/verilog.js on lines 204..215
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js on lines 93..104

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 126.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  Results.prototype.showLoading = function (params) {
    this.hideLoading();

    var loadingMore = this.options.get('translations').get('searching');
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/select2.full.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-lib/select2/4_0_3/debug/js/select2.js on lines 922..936

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 126.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  Results.prototype.showLoading = function (params) {
    this.hideLoading();

    var loadingMore = this.options.get('translations').get('searching');
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.pmm.nodes/js-lib/select2/4_0_3/debug/js/select2.js and 1 other location - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/src/js/lib/select2.full.js on lines 1002..1016

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 126.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  function tokenString(quote) {
    return function(stream, state) {
      var escaped = false, next, end = false;
      while ((next = stream.next()) != null) {
        if (next == quote && !escaped) {end = true; break;}
Severity: Major
Found in de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/verilog/verilog.js and 3 other locations - About 4 hrs to fix
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/pig/pig.js on lines 46..59
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js on lines 93..104
de.bund.bfr.knime.js/js-lib/codemirror-5.49.2/mode/vhdl/vhdl.js on lines 105..116

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 126.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language