Showing 156 of 156 total issues
Method startDebugLinear
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public List<Configuration> startDebugLinear(Configuration config, long start, long end) {
List<Configuration> allFailingConfigurations = new LinkedList<Configuration>();
List<Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>> pairs = new LinkedList<Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>>();
pairs.add((Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>)Pair.of((Pair<Long, Long>)Pair.of(start, end),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method startDebugBinary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public List<Configuration> startDebugBinary(Configuration config) {
List<Configuration> allFailingConfigurations = new LinkedList<Configuration>();
List<Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>> pairs = new LinkedList<Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>>();
pairs.add((Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>)Pair.of((Pair<Long, Long>)Pair.of(0L,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method startDebugBinary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<Configuration> startDebugBinary(Configuration config) {
List<Configuration> allFailingConfigurations = new LinkedList<>();
List<Pair<Pair<Long, Long>, Configuration>> pairs = new LinkedList<>();
pairs.add(Pair.of(Pair.of(0L, (long) config.getInvocationCount()), config));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generateHtml
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void generateHtml(Set<String> allFailures, Configuration config) {
String head = "<!DOCTYPE html>"
+ "<html>"
+ "<head>"
+ "<title>Test Results</title>"
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private List<Configuration> createNewSeedsToRetry() {
Configuration someFailingConfig = this.failingConfigurations.iterator().next();
int newSeed = someFailingConfig.seed * ConfigurationDefaults.SEED_FACTOR;
List<Configuration> retryWOtherSeeds = new LinkedList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private List<Configuration> createNewSeedsToRetry() {
Configuration someFailingConfig = this.failingConfigurations.iterator().next();
int newSeed = someFailingConfig.seed * ConfigurationDefaults.SEED_FACTOR;
List<Configuration> retryWithOtherSeeds = new LinkedList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 127.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method generateHtml
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void generateHtml(Set<String> allFailures, Configuration config) {
String head = "<!DOCTYPE html>"
+ "<html>"
+ "<head>"
+ "<title>Test Results</title>"
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run() throws MojoExecutionException {
Xpp3Dom origNode = null;
if (this.surefire.getConfiguration() != null) {
origNode = new Xpp3Dom((Xpp3Dom) this.surefire.getConfiguration());
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method printAndGetSummary
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean printAndGetSummary(Configuration config) {
Set<String> allFailures = new LinkedHashSet<>();
Map<String, Integer> countsOfFailingTestsWithoutShuffling = new LinkedHashMap<>();
boolean failsWithoutShuffling = false;
Logger.getGlobal().log(Level.INFO, "NonDex SUMMARY:");
Method printSummary
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void printSummary(Configuration config) {
Set<String> allFailures = new LinkedHashSet<>();
Map<String, Integer> countsOfFailingTestsWithoutShuffling =
new LinkedHashMap<String, Integer>();
boolean failsWithoutShuffling = false;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String makeResultString(List<Configuration> debuggedOnes) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (Configuration config : debuggedOnes) {
if (config == null) {
continue;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 112.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private String makeResultString(List<Configuration> debuggedOnes) {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (Configuration config : debuggedOnes) {
if (config == null) {
continue;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 112.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run() throws MojoExecutionException {
Xpp3Dom origNode = null;
if (this.surefire.getConfiguration() != null) {
origNode = new Xpp3Dom((Xpp3Dom) this.surefire.getConfiguration());
}
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package edu.illinois.nondex.functionalTest;
import static org.hamcrest.core.IsEqual.equalTo;
import static org.hamcrest.core.IsNot.not;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
/*
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2015 Alex Gyori
Copyright (c) 2022 Kaiyao Ke
Copyright (c) 2015 Owolabi Legunsen
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method execute
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void execute() throws MojoExecutionException, MojoFailureException {
super.execute();
Logger.getGlobal().log(Level.INFO, "The original argline is: " + this.originalArgLine);
MojoExecutionException allExceptions = null;
Method setupArgline
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected void setupArgline(Xpp3Dom configNode) {
String localRepo = this.mavenSession.getSettings().getLocalRepository();
String pathToNondex = this.getPathToNondexJar(localRepo);
String annotationsModuleName = "nondex-annotations";
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void addHasNext() {
MethodVisitor mv = super.visitMethod(Opcodes.ACC_PUBLIC, "hasNext", "()Z", null, null);
mv.visitCode();
mv.visitVarInsn(Opcodes.ALOAD, 0);
mv.visitFieldInsn(Opcodes.GETFIELD, "java/util/PriorityQueue$Itr", "iter", "Ljava/util/Iterator;");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void addHasNext() {
MethodVisitor mv = super.visitMethod(Opcodes.ACC_PUBLIC, "hasNext", "()Z", null, null);
mv.visitCode();
mv.visitVarInsn(Opcodes.ALOAD, 0);
mv.visitFieldInsn(Opcodes.GETFIELD, "java/util/WeakHashMap$HashIterator", "iter", "Ljava/util/Iterator;");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method execute
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void execute(JvmTestExecutionSpec spec, TestResultProcessor testResultProcessor) {
Logger.getGlobal().log(Level.INFO, "The original argline is: " + nondexTestTask.getOriginalArgLine());
NonDexTestProcessor cleanRunProcessor = new NonDexTestProcessor(testResultProcessor);