Showing 922 of 922 total issues
Method operation_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def operation_status(status, verbose: false, default_status: nil, i18n_prefix: nil)
status = status.status if status.respond_to?(:status)
status ||= default_status
return unless status
i18n_prefix ||= "operation_support.statuses"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_instance
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_instance(context, options = {})
options = { parent: nil, save: false }.update(options)
parent = options[:parent]
save = options[:save]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render() {
const {
vjas,
x,
y,
Method candidate_target_attributes
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def candidate_target_attributes # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength,Metrics/AbcSize
Chouette::ModelAttribute.collection do # rubocop:disable Metrics/BlockLength
# Chouette::Line
select Chouette::Line, :name
select Chouette::Line, :color
Method new_alt_calendar
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new_alt_calendar(options = {}, &block)
raise(ArgumentError, "No year given") unless options.has_key?(:year)
raise(ArgumentError, "No month given") unless options.has_key?(:month)
block ||= Proc.new {|d| nil}
Function render
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
render() {
let id = _.get(actions.getSelected(this.props.vehicleJourneys), ['0', 'short_id'])
if(this.props.status.isFetching == true) {
return false
Method import_stops
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_stops
sorted_stops = source.stops.sort_by { |s| s.parent_station.present? ? 1 : 0 }
@stop_areas_id_by_registration_number = {}
CustomFieldsSupport.within_workgroup(workbench.workgroup) do
File table_builder_helper.rb
has 293 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'table_builder_helper/column'
require 'table_builder_helper/url'
# table_builder_2
# A Rails helper that constructs an HTML table from a collection of objects. It
Class Workgroup
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Workgroup < ApplicationModel
NIGHTLY_AGGREGATE_CRON_TIME = 5.minutes
DEFAULT_EXPORT_TYPES = %w[Export::Gtfs Export::NetexGeneric Export::Ara].freeze
belongs_to :line_referential, dependent: :destroy, required: true
Class Workbench
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Workbench < ApplicationModel
prepend LockedReferentialToAggregateWithLog
include ObjectidFormatterSupport
Class Line
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Line < Chouette::ActiveRecord
# Must be defined before ObjectidSupport
before_validation :define_line_referential, on: :create
before_validation :update_unpermitted_blank_values
File experimental.rb
has 291 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Merge::Referential
module Sanitizer
def sanitize_joins(query)
# in fact, new.slug is already sanitized but .. it is better to be safe than sorry.
Method thead
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def thead(collection, columns, sortable, selectable, has_links, overhead, model, action)
content_tag :thead do
# Inserts overhead content if any specified
over_head = ''
Method table_builder
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def table_builder collection, columns, actions, selectable = [], cls = nil
return unless collection.present?
head = content_tag :thead do
content_tag :tr do
Function vehicleJourney
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const vehicleJourney= (state = {}, action, keep) => {
switch (action.type) {
case 'SELECT_VEHICLEJOURNEY':
return _.assign({}, state, {selected: !state.selected})
case 'CANCEL_SELECTION':
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handle_serialize_option
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_serialize_option attribute_name, opts
serializer = opts[:serialize]
define_method attribute_name do
return nil unless respond_to?(:options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find_or_create_journey_pattern
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_or_create_journey_pattern(resource, trip, stop_times)
journey_pattern_id = journey_pattern_ids[trip_signature(trip, stop_times)]
return Chouette::JourneyPattern.find(journey_pattern_id) if journey_pattern_id
stop_points = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_transfers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_transfers
@trips = {}
create_resource(:transfers).each(source.transfers, slice: 100, transaction: true) do |transfer, resource|
next unless transfer.type == '2'
from_id = @stop_areas_id_by_registration_number[transfer.from_stop_id]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method valid_days
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.valid_days(int_day_types)
# Build an array with day of calendar week (1-7, Monday is 1).
[].tap do |valid_days|
valid_days << 1 if day_by_mask(int_day_types,MONDAY)
valid_days << 2 if day_by_mask(int_day_types,TUESDAY)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove_periods!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_periods!(removed_periods)
deleted_dates = []
dates.each do |date|
if removed_periods.any? { |p| p.include? date.date }
deleted_dates << date
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"