Showing 34 of 37 total issues
Function main
has 184 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func main() {
metricsAddr := flag.String("metrics-bind-address", ":8080", "The address the metric endpoint binds to.")
enableLeaderElection := flag.Bool("leader-elect", false,
"Enable leader election for controller manager. "+
"Enabling this will ensure there is only one active controller manager.")
Method NamespaceQuotaValidator.Handle
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *NamespaceQuotaValidator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.validate-namespace-quota.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name,
Method RatioValidator.Handle
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *RatioValidator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.validate-request-ratio.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name, "kind", req.Kind.Kind)
Function main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func main() {
metricsAddr := flag.String("metrics-bind-address", ":8080", "The address the metric endpoint binds to.")
enableLeaderElection := flag.Bool("leader-elect", false,
"Enable leader election for controller manager. "+
"Enabling this will ensure there is only one active controller manager.")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GroupSyncReconciler.Reconcile
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *GroupSyncReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ctrl.Result, error) {
l := log.FromContext(ctx)
l.Info("Reconciling Group")
finalizerName := UpstreamFinalizerPrefix + r.ControlAPIFinalizerZoneName
Method GroupSyncReconciler.Reconcile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *GroupSyncReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ctrl.Result, error) {
l := log.FromContext(ctx)
l.Info("Reconciling Group")
finalizerName := UpstreamFinalizerPrefix + r.ControlAPIFinalizerZoneName
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PodNodeSelectorMutator.Handle
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *PodNodeSelectorMutator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.mutate-pod-node-selector.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name,
Method NamespaceQuotaValidator.Handle
has 13 return statements (exceeds 8 allowed). Open
func (v *NamespaceQuotaValidator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.validate-namespace-quota.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *UserAttributeSyncReconciler) SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster(mgr ctrl.Manager, foreign clustersource.ClusterSource) error {
return ctrl.NewControllerManagedBy(mgr).
For(&userv1.User{}).
WatchesRawSource(foreign.SourceFor(&controlv1.User{}), &handler.EnqueueRequestForObject{}).
Complete(r)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 117.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *ZoneUsageProfileSyncReconciler) SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster(mgr ctrl.Manager, foreign clustersource.ClusterSource) error {
return ctrl.NewControllerManagedBy(mgr).
For(&cloudagentv1.ZoneUsageProfile{}).
WatchesRawSource(foreign.SourceFor(&controlv1.UsageProfile{}), &handler.EnqueueRequestForObject{}).
Complete(r)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 117.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method RatioValidator.Handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *RatioValidator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.validate-request-ratio.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name, "kind", req.Kind.Kind)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method GroupSyncReconciler.Reconcile
has 11 return statements (exceeds 8 allowed). Open
func (r *GroupSyncReconciler) Reconcile(ctx context.Context, req ctrl.Request) (ctrl.Result, error) {
l := log.FromContext(ctx)
l.Info("Reconciling Group")
finalizerName := UpstreamFinalizerPrefix + r.ControlAPIFinalizerZoneName
Method RatioReconciler.warnNamespace
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *RatioReconciler) warnNamespace(ctx context.Context, name string, nsRatio *ratio.Ratio, sel string, limit *resource.Quantity) error {
Method ZoneUsageProfileApplyReconciler.applyResourceToNamespace
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *ZoneUsageProfileApplyReconciler) applyResourceToNamespace(ctx context.Context, name string, orgNs corev1.Namespace, resource runtime.RawExtension, profile cloudagentv1.ZoneUsageProfile) error {
Method RatioReconciler.warnPod
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *RatioReconciler) warnPod(ctx context.Context, name, namespace string, nsRatio *ratio.Ratio, sel string, limit *resource.Quantity) error {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if err := (&controllers.UserAttributeSyncReconciler{
Client: mgr.GetClient(),
Scheme: mgr.GetScheme(),
Recorder: mgr.GetEventRecorderFor("user-attribute-sync-controller"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if err := (&controllers.ZoneUsageProfileSyncReconciler{
Client: mgr.GetClient(),
Scheme: mgr.GetScheme(),
Recorder: mgr.GetEventRecorderFor("usage-profile-sync-controller"),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method PodNodeSelectorMutator.Handle
has 9 return statements (exceeds 8 allowed). Open
func (v *PodNodeSelectorMutator) Handle(ctx context.Context, req admission.Request) admission.Response {
l := log.FromContext(ctx).
WithName("webhook.mutate-pod-node-selector.appuio.io").
WithValues("id", req.UID, "user", req.UserInfo.Username).
WithValues("namespace", req.Namespace, "name", req.Name,
comment on exported method UserAttributeSyncReconciler.SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster should be of the form "SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster ..." Open
// SetupWithManager sets up the controller with the Manager.
- Exclude checks
comment on exported method ZoneUsageProfileSyncReconciler.SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster should be of the form "SetupWithManagerAndForeignCluster ..." Open
// SetupWithManager sets up the controller with the Manager.
- Exclude checks