Showing 615 of 615 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
assert.True(t, strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[0], expF[2]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[1], expF[2]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[2], expF[2]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[3], expF[2]))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
t.Run("normal flow", func(t *testing.T) {
lvm, m := testhelpers.MakeFakeLvm()
setupNormalFlowApply(m, "", true, true)
_ = simpleApplySuccess(t, lvm)
m.AssertCalled(t, "Mkfs", "/dev/mapper/vg0-data", "xfs")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
assert.True(t, strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[0], expF[1]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[1], expF[1]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[2], expF[1]) || strings.Contains(u.fetchContents[3], expF[1]))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
t.Run("no mkfs, only unit update and mount", func(t *testing.T) {
lvm, m := testhelpers.MakeFakeLvm()
setupNormalFlowApply(m, "xfs", true, false) // "xfs", no unit diffs, mount is NOT mounted
_ = simpleApplySuccess(t, lvm)
m.AssertNotCalled(t, "Mkfs", "/dev/mapper/vg0-data", "xfs")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
t.Run("when not installed", func(t *testing.T) {
expected := ""
a := &apt.Manager{Sys: newRunner("", makeExitError("", 1))}
result, found := a.InstalledVersion("foo1")
assert.False(t, found)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
t.Run("when not installed", func(t *testing.T) {
expected := ""
y := &rpm.YumManager{Sys: newRunner("", makeExitError("", 1))}
result, found := y.InstalledVersion("foo1")
assert.False(t, found)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function VertexSplitTraverse
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func VertexSplitTraverse(g *graph.Graph, toFind string, startingNode string, stop func(*graph.Graph, string) bool, history map[string]struct{}) (string, string, bool) {
Method Preparer.convertTime
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertTime(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertPointer
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertPointer(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertSlice
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertSlice(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertDuration
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertDuration(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertInterface
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertInterface(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertMap
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertMap(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Method Preparer.convertValue
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertValue(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (out reflect.Value, err error) {
Method Preparer.convertNumber
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *Preparer) convertNumber(typ reflect.Type, r Renderer, name string, val interface{}, base int) (reflect.Value, error) {
Function simpleApplySuccess
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func simpleApplySuccess(t *testing.T, lvm lowlevel.LVM, group string, name string, size *lowlevel.LvmSize) resource.TaskStatus {
Function NewResourceVG
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewResourceVG(lvm lowlevel.LVM, name string, devs []string, remove bool, forceRemove bool) resource.Task {
Function newMockOS
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func newMockOS(ownedFiles []ownershipRecord,
users []*user.User,
groups []*user.Group,
defaultUser *user.User,
defaultGroup *user.Group,
Function simpleCheckFailure
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func simpleCheckFailure(t *testing.T, lvm lowlevel.LVM, group string, name string, size *lowlevel.LvmSize) resource.TaskStatus {
Function execPipeline
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func execPipeline(ctx context.Context, in *graph.Graph, pipelineF MkPipelineF, renderingPlant *render.Factory, notify *graph.Notifier) (*graph.Graph, error) {