Showing 1,904 of 1,904 total issues
Method Cluster.GetServices
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) GetServices(options types.ServiceListOptions) ([]swarm.Service, error) {
c.mu.RLock()
defer c.mu.RUnlock()
state := c.currentNodeState()
Method ImageService.ImageHistory
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) ImageHistory(ctx context.Context, name string, platform *ocispec.Platform) ([]*imagetype.HistoryResponseItem, error) {
start := time.Now()
img, err := i.resolveImage(ctx, name)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (sr *swarmRouter) getTasks(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
filter, err := filters.FromJSON(r.Form.Get("filters"))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 226.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (sr *swarmRouter) getNodes(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
filter, err := filters.FromJSON(r.Form.Get("filters"))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 226.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function volumeName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func volumeName(path string) (v string) {
if len(path) < 2 {
return ""
}
// with drive letter
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method LayerDownloadManager.Download
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ldm *LayerDownloadManager) Download(ctx context.Context, initialRootFS image.RootFS, layers []DownloadDescriptor, progressOutput progress.Output) (image.RootFS, func(), error) {
var (
topLayer layer.Layer
topDownload *downloadTransfer
watcher *watcher
Method driver.Join
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) Join(ctx context.Context, nid, eid string, sboxKey string, jinfo driverapi.JoinInfo, options map[string]interface{}) error {
ctx, span := otel.Tracer("").Start(ctx, "libnetwork.drivers.overlay.Join", trace.WithAttributes(
attribute.String("nid", nid),
attribute.String("eid", eid),
attribute.String("sboxKey", sboxKey)))
Method client.processEventStream
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *client) processEventStream(ctx context.Context, ns string) {
// Create a new context specifically for this subscription.
// The context must be cancelled to cancel the subscription.
// In cases where we have to restart event stream processing,
// we'll need the original context b/c this one will be cancelled
Method ImageService.createDiff
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) createDiff(ctx context.Context, name string, sn snapshots.Snapshotter, cs content.Store, comparer diff.Comparer) (*ocispec.Descriptor, digest.Digest, error) {
info, err := sn.Stat(ctx, name)
if err != nil {
return nil, "", err
}
Method walker.walk
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (w *walker) walk(path string, i1, i2 os.FileInfo) (err error) {
// Register these nodes with the return trees, unless we're still at the
// (already-created) roots:
if path != "/" {
if err := walkchunk(path, i1, w.dir1, w.root1); err != nil {
Function verifyPlatformContainerResources
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func verifyPlatformContainerResources(resources *containertypes.Resources, isHyperv bool) (warnings []string, err error) {
fixMemorySwappiness(resources)
if !isHyperv {
// The processor resource controls are mutually exclusive on
// Windows Server Containers, the order of precedence is
Method Daemon.statsV2
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) statsV2(s *containertypes.StatsResponse, stats *statsV2.Metrics) (*containertypes.StatsResponse, error) {
if stats.Io != nil {
var isbr []containertypes.BlkioStatEntry
for _, re := range stats.Io.Usage {
isbr = append(isbr,
Method ImageService.manifestMatchesPlatform
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (i *ImageService) manifestMatchesPlatform(ctx context.Context, img *image.Image, platform ocispec.Platform) (bool, error) {
ls, err := i.leases.ListResources(ctx, leases.Lease{ID: imageKey(img.ID().String())})
if err != nil {
if cerrdefs.IsNotFound(err) {
return false, nil
Function merge
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func merge(userConf, imageConf *containertypes.Config) error {
if userConf.User == "" {
userConf.User = imageConf.User
}
if len(userConf.ExposedPorts) == 0 {
layerStore
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type layerStore struct {
store *fileMetadataStore
driver graphdriver.Driver
layerMap map[ChainID]*roLayer
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func getPluginClient(p plugingetter.CompatPlugin) (*plugins.Client, error) {
if v1, ok := p.(plugingetter.PluginWithV1Client); ok {
return v1.Client(), nil
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 220.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func getPluginClient(p plugingetter.CompatPlugin) (*plugins.Client, error) {
if v1, ok := p.(plugingetter.PluginWithV1Client); ok {
return v1.Client(), nil
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 220.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 5:
if wireType != 2 {
return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field Env", wireType)
}
var stringLen uint64
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 219.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 4:
if wireType != 2 {
return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field Networks", wireType)
}
var stringLen uint64
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 219.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 7:
if wireType != 2 {
return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field Aliases", wireType)
}
var stringLen uint64
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 219.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76