Showing 1,904 of 1,904 total issues
Function validateEndpointSettings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func validateEndpointSettings(nw *libnetwork.Network, nwName string, epConfig *networktypes.EndpointSettings) error {
if epConfig == nil {
return nil
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) CreateConfig(s types.ConfigSpec) (string, error) {
var resp *swarmapi.CreateConfigResponse
if err := c.lockedManagerAction(func(ctx context.Context, state nodeState) error {
configSpec := convert.ConfigSpecToGRPC(s)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 195.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) CreateSecret(s types.SecretSpec) (string, error) {
var resp *swarmapi.CreateSecretResponse
if err := c.lockedManagerAction(func(ctx context.Context, state nodeState) error {
secretSpec := convert.SecretSpecToGRPC(s)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 195.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method addrSpace.allocatePredefinedPool
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (aSpace *addrSpace) allocatePredefinedPool(reserved []netip.Prefix) (netip.Prefix, error) {
aSpace.mu.Lock()
defer aSpace.mu.Unlock()
var pdfID int
Method Network.addLBBackend
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (n *Network) addLBBackend(ip net.IP, lb *loadBalancer) {
if len(lb.vip) == 0 {
return
}
Method distributionRouter.fetchManifest
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *distributionRouter) fetchManifest(ctx context.Context, distrepo distribution.Repository, namedRef reference.Named) (registry.DistributionInspect, error) {
var distributionInspect registry.DistributionInspect
if canonicalRef, ok := namedRef.(reference.Canonical); !ok {
namedRef = reference.TagNameOnly(namedRef)
Method Daemon.setupMounts
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) setupMounts(ctx context.Context, c *container.Container) ([]container.Mount, func(context.Context) error, error) {
var mounts []container.Mount
// TODO: tmpfs mounts should be part of Mountpoints
tmpfsMounts := make(map[string]bool)
tmpfsMountInfo, err := c.TmpfsMounts()
Method container.NewTask
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *container) NewTask(ctx context.Context, checkpointDir string, withStdin bool, attachStdio libcontainerdtypes.StdioCallback) (libcontainerdtypes.Task, error) {
var (
checkpoint *types.Descriptor
t containerd.Task
rio cio.IO
File container.go
has 503 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package convert // import "github.com/docker/docker/daemon/cluster/convert"
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
Function skipAgent
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipAgent(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
Method Controller.handleEpTableEvent
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Controller) handleEpTableEvent(ev events.Event) {
var (
nid string
eid string
value []byte
Function skipOverlay
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipOverlay(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
Method driver.createNetwork
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) createNetwork(config *networkConfiguration) (err error) {
// Initialize handle when needed
d.Lock()
if d.nlh.Handle == nil {
d.nlh = ns.NlHandle()
Function skipNetworkdb
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipNetworkdb(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
Method networkRouter.getNetwork
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (n *networkRouter) getNetwork(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
Function skipPlugin
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipPlugin(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
Function skipEntry
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func skipEntry(dAtA []byte) (n int, err error) {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
depth := 0
for iNdEx < l {
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if len(n.config.Ipv6Subnets) > 0 {
s := n.getSubnetforIPv6(ep.addrv6)
if s == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("could not find a valid ipv6 subnet for endpoint %s", eid)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if len(n.config.Ipv4Subnets) > 0 {
s := n.getSubnetforIPv4(ep.addr)
if s == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("could not find a valid ipv4 subnet for endpoint %s", eid)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if len(n.config.Ipv4Subnets) > 0 {
s := n.getSubnetforIPv4(ep.addr)
if s == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("could not find a valid ipv4 subnet for endpoint %s", eid)
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 192.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76