Showing 1,860 of 1,860 total issues
Method driver.NetworkAllocate has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) NetworkAllocate(id string, option map[string]string, ipV4Data, ipV6Data []driverapi.IPAMData) (map[string]string, error) {
if id == "" {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid network id for overlay network")
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function programSA has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func programSA(localIP, remoteIP net.IP, spi *spi, k *key, dir int, add bool) (fSA *netlink.XfrmState, rSA *netlink.XfrmState, err error) {
var (
action = "Removing"
xfrmProgram = ns.NlHandle().XfrmStateDel
)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getMountOptions has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getMountOptions(opts *optsConfig, resolveIP func(string, string) (*net.IPAddr, error)) (mountDevice string, mountOpts string, _ error) {
if opts.MountDevice == "" {
return "", "", fmt.Errorf("missing device in volume options")
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method driver.parseNetworkOptions has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) parseNetworkOptions(id string, genericOptions map[string]string) (*networkConfiguration, error) {
config := &networkConfiguration{Type: d.name}
for label, value := range genericOptions {
switch label {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseEndpointOptions has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func parseEndpointOptions(epOptions map[string]interface{}) (*endpointOption, error) {
if epOptions == nil {
return nil, nil
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Builder.dispatchDockerfileWithCancellation has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (b *Builder) dispatchDockerfileWithCancellation(ctx context.Context, parseResult []instructions.Stage, metaArgs []instructions.ArgCommand, escapeToken rune, source builder.Source) (*dispatchState, error) {
dispatchRequest := dispatchRequest{}
buildArgs := NewBuildArgs(b.options.BuildArgs)
totalCommands := len(metaArgs) + len(parseResult)
currentCommandIndex := 1- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ValidateIPAM has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ValidateIPAM(ipam *IPAM, enableIPv6 bool) error {
if ipam == nil {
return nil
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method client.extractResourcesFromSpec has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *client) extractResourcesFromSpec(spec *specs.Spec, configuration *hcsshim.ContainerConfig) {
if spec.Windows.Resources != nil {
if spec.Windows.Resources.CPU != nil {
if spec.Windows.Resources.CPU.Count != nil {
// This check is being done here rather than in adaptContainerSettings- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method containerConfig.applyPrivileges has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *containerConfig) applyPrivileges(hc *enginecontainer.HostConfig) {
privileges := c.spec().Privileges
if privileges == nil {
return
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function buildPortsRelatedCreateEndpointOptions has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func buildPortsRelatedCreateEndpointOptions(c *container.Container, n *libnetwork.Network, sb *libnetwork.Sandbox) ([]libnetwork.EndpointOption, error) {
// Port-mapping rules belong to the container & applicable only to non-internal networks.
//
// TODO(thaJeztah): Look if we can provide a more minimal function for getPortMapInfo, as it does a lot, and we only need the "length".
if n.Internal() || len(getPortMapInfo(sb)) > 0 {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getTailReader has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getTailReader(ctx context.Context, r loggerutils.SizeReaderAt, req int) (io.Reader, int, error) {
size := r.Size()
if req < 0 {
return nil, 0, errdefs.InvalidParameter(errors.Errorf("invalid number of lines to tail: %d", req))
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function New has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func New(info logger.Info) (logger.Logger, error) {
containerStreamConfig, err := newStreamConfig(info)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reader.readLogs has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *reader) readLogs() {
defer close(r.logWatcher.Msg)
// Make sure the ready channel is closed in the event of an early
// return.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getSystemCPUUsage has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func getSystemCPUUsage() (cpuUsage uint64, cpuNum uint32, err error) {
f, err := os.Open("/proc/stat")
if err != nil {
return 0, 0, err
}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.execSetPlatformOpt has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) execSetPlatformOpt(ctx context.Context, daemonCfg *config.Config, ec *container.ExecConfig, p *specs.Process) error {
if len(ec.User) > 0 {
var err error
if daemon.UsesSnapshotter() {
p.User, err = getUserFromContainerd(ctx, daemon.containerdClient, ec)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ChangesSize has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func ChangesSize(newDir string, changes []Change) int64 {
var (
size int64
sf = make(map[uint64]struct{})
)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method scanner.Scan has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *scanner) Scan(ctx context.Context) bool {
if s.err != nil {
return false
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method BytesPipe.Write has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (bp *BytesPipe) Write(p []byte) (int, error) {
bp.mu.Lock()
defer bp.mu.Unlock()
written := 0- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function check_iptables has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_iptables(name, plist):
replace = (':', ',')
ports = []
for port in plist:
for r in replace:- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_namespaces has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_namespaces(data, ingress=False):
if ingress is True:
return {"Ingress":"/var/run/docker/netns/ingress_sbox"}
else:
spaces =[]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"