Showing 640 of 640 total issues
Method IndividualListPage.WriteHTMLTo
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *IndividualListPage) WriteHTMLTo(w io.Writer) (int64, error) {
table := []core.Component{
core.NewTableHead("Name", "Birth", "Death"),
}
Method Publisher.Places
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (publisher *Publisher) Places() map[string]*place {
if publisher.placesMap == nil {
publisher.placesMap = map[string]*place{}
// Get all of the unique place names.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Number.UpperRoman
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (n Number) UpperRoman() (string, error) {
// Catch edge cases first.
switch {
case n == 0:
return "N", nil
Method IndividualEvents.WriteHTMLTo
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *IndividualEvents) WriteHTMLTo(w io.Writer) (int64, error) {
var events []core.Component
for _, event := range c.individual.AllEvents() {
date, place := gedcom.DateAndPlace(event)
Method DiffPage.WriteHTMLTo
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *DiffPage) WriteHTMLTo(w io.Writer) (int64, error) {
if c.progress != nil {
c.progress <- gedcom.Progress{
Total: int64(len(c.comparisons)),
}
Your code does not pass gofmt in 14 places. Go fmt your code! Open
// Package q is the "gedcom query" parser and engine.
- Exclude checks
Method IndividualNode.incorrectEventOrderWarnings
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (node *IndividualNode) incorrectEventOrderWarnings() (warnings Warnings) {
// Event order describes the boundaries of groups of events. That is to say
// that any baptism or LDS baptism events must be after a birth event but
// also much be before the any death event.
eventOrder := []*struct {
Method FamilyNode.siblingsBornTooCloseWarnings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (node *FamilyNode) siblingsBornTooCloseWarnings() (warnings Warnings) {
pairs := IndividualNodePairs{}
nineMonths := time.Duration(274 * 24 * time.Hour)
twoDays := time.Duration(2 * 24 * time.Hour)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PartnersAndChildren.WriteHTMLTo
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *PartnersAndChildren) WriteHTMLTo(w io.Writer) (int64, error) {
heading := core.NewHeading(2, "", core.NewText("Spouses & Children"))
column := core.NewColumn(core.EntireRow, heading)
rows := []core.Component{
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (node *FamilyNode) Husband() (husband *HusbandNode) {
if node == nil {
return nil
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 130.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (node *FamilyNode) Wife() (wife *WifeNode) {
if node == nil {
return nil
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 130.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if death, _ := node.Death(); death != nil && death.DateRange().IsValid() {
dateParts = append(dateParts, fmt.Sprintf("d. %s", death.String()))
} else if burial, _ := node.Burial(); burial != nil && burial.DateRange().IsValid() {
dateParts = append(dateParts, fmt.Sprintf("bur. %s", burial.String()))
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if birth, _ := node.Birth(); birth != nil && birth.DateRange().IsValid() {
dateParts = append(dateParts, fmt.Sprintf("b. %s", birth.String()))
} else if baptism, _ := node.Baptism(); baptism != nil && baptism.DateRange().IsValid() {
dateParts = append(dateParts, fmt.Sprintf("bap. %s", baptism.String()))
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 129.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method IndividualNodesCompareOptions.calculateWinners
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *IndividualNodesCompareOptions) calculateWinners(a, b IndividualNodes, similarityResults chan *IndividualComparison, options SimilarityOptions) chan *IndividualComparison {
// See description in createJobs().
winners := make(chan *IndividualComparison, 1000)
go func() {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function NewDiffPage
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewDiffPage(comparisons gedcom.IndividualComparisons, filterFlags *gedcom.FilterFlags, googleAnalyticsID string, show, sort string, progress chan gedcom.Progress, compareOptions *gedcom.IndividualNodesCompareOptions, visibility LivingVisibility) *DiffPage {
Function runDiffCommand
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func runDiffCommand() {
var optionLeftGedcomFile string
var optionRightGedcomFile string
var optionOutputFile string
var optionShow string // see optionShow constants.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method LastExpr.Evaluate
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (e *LastExpr) Evaluate(engine *Engine, input interface{}, args []*Statement) (interface{}, error) {
in := reflect.ValueOf(input)
if len(args) != 1 {
return nil, errors.New("function Last() must take a single argument")
Function NewPublishHeader
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewPublishHeader(document *gedcom.Document, extraTab string, selectedTab string, options *PublishShowOptions, indexLetters []rune, placesMap map[string]*place) *PublishHeader {
Function NewIndividualListPage
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewIndividualListPage(document *gedcom.Document, selectedLetter rune, googleAnalyticsID string, options *PublishShowOptions, indexLetters []rune, placesMap map[string]*place) *IndividualListPage {
Function NewPlacePage
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewPlacePage(document *gedcom.Document, placeKey string, googleAnalyticsID string, options *PublishShowOptions, indexLetters []rune, placesMap map[string]*place) *PlacePage {