fedspendingtransparency/usaspending-api

View on GitHub

Showing 164 of 226 total issues

Function build_elasticsearch_result has a Cognitive Complexity of 81 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def build_elasticsearch_result(self, response: dict) -> Dict[str, dict]:
        results = {}
        geo_info_buckets = response.get("group_by_agg_key", {}).get("buckets", [])

        for bucket in geo_info_buckets:
Severity: Minor
Found in usaspending_api/disaster/v2/views/spending_by_geography.py - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File download_generation.py has 631 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

import json
import logging
import multiprocessing
import os
from copy import deepcopy
Severity: Major
Found in usaspending_api/download/filestreaming/download_generation.py - About 1 day to fix

    File award_search.py has 631 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    from usaspending_api.awards.v2.lookups.lookups import award_type_mapping
    
    AWARD_SEARCH_COLUMNS = {
        "treasury_account_identifiers": {"delta": "ARRAY<INTEGER>", "postgres": "INTEGER[]", "gold": False},
        "award_id": {"delta": "LONG NOT NULL", "postgres": "BIGINT NOT NULL", "gold": False},
    Severity: Major
    Found in usaspending_api/search/delta_models/award_search.py - About 1 day to fix

      File federal_accounts_v2.py has 626 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      import ast
      from collections import OrderedDict
      from typing import List
      
      from django.db.models import DecimalField, Exists, F, Func, OuterRef, Q, Subquery, Sum
      Severity: Major
      Found in usaspending_api/accounts/views/federal_accounts_v2.py - About 1 day to fix

        File delete_data.py has 560 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        import logging
        from time import perf_counter
        from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Union
        
        import pandas as pd
        Severity: Major
        Found in usaspending_api/etl/elasticsearch_loader_helpers/delete_data.py - About 1 day to fix

          Function type_filter has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def type_filter(_type, filters, limit=None):
              _types = [
                  "budget_function",
                  "budget_subfunction",
                  "federal_account",
          Severity: Minor
          Found in usaspending_api/spending_explorer/v2/filters/type_filter.py - About 1 day to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function subaward_filter. (63)
          Open

          def subaward_filter(filters, for_downloads=False):
              queryset = SubawardSearch.objects.all()
          
              recipient_scope_q = Q(sub_legal_entity_country_code="USA") | Q(sub_legal_entity_country_name="UNITED STATES")
              pop_scope_q = Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_co="USA") | Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_name="UNITED STATES")

          Cyclomatic Complexity

          Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

          Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

          Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
          if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
          elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
          else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
          for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
          while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
          except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
          finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
          with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
          assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
          Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
          Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

          Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

          File disaster_base.py has 504 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          import json
          from datetime import date
          from functools import lru_cache
          from typing import Dict, List, Optional
          
          
          Severity: Major
          Found in usaspending_api/disaster/v2/views/disaster_base.py - About 1 day to fix

            File conftest.py has 477 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            import logging
            import os
            import sys
            import tempfile
            from pathlib import Path
            Severity: Minor
            Found in usaspending_api/conftest.py - About 7 hrs to fix

              File spending_by_geography.py has 477 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              import copy
              import logging
              from decimal import Decimal
              from enum import Enum
              from typing import Dict, List, Optional
              Severity: Minor
              Found in usaspending_api/search/v2/views/spending_by_geography.py - About 7 hrs to fix

                File transaction_search.py has 471 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                from django.contrib.postgres.fields import ArrayField
                from django.db import models
                from django.db.models import Q
                
                from usaspending_api.common.custom_django_fields import NumericField
                Severity: Minor
                Found in usaspending_api/search/models/transaction_search.py - About 7 hrs to fix

                  File spending_by_award.py has 469 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  import copy
                  from ast import literal_eval
                  
                  from sys import maxsize
                  from typing import List
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in usaspending_api/search/v2/views/spending_by_award.py - About 7 hrs to fix

                    Function construct_es_response_for_prime_awards has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                        def construct_es_response_for_prime_awards(self, response) -> dict:
                            results = []
                            should_return_display_award_id = "Award ID" in self.fields
                            should_return_recipient_id = "recipient_id" in self.fields
                            for res in response:
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in usaspending_api/search/v2/views/spending_by_award.py - About 7 hrs to fix

                    Cognitive Complexity

                    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                    Further reading

                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                                if row["funding_agency_code"] is None or len(row["funding_agency_code"].strip()) < 1:
                                    funding_subtier_agency_id = subtier_agency_map.get(row["funding_sub_tier_agency_co"])
                                    if funding_subtier_agency_id is not None:
                                        funding_toptier_agency_id = subtier_to_agency_map[funding_subtier_agency_id]["toptier_agency_id"]
                                        funding_toptier_code = toptier_agency_map[funding_toptier_agency_id]
                    usaspending_api/broker/management/commands/update_transactions.py on lines 287..296

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 113.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                                    if row["funding_agency_code"] is None or len(row["funding_agency_code"].strip()) < 1:
                                        funding_subtier_agency_id = subtier_agency_map.get(row["funding_sub_tier_agency_co"])
                                        if funding_subtier_agency_id is not None:
                                            funding_toptier_agency_id = subtier_to_agency_map[funding_subtier_agency_id][
                                                "toptier_agency_id"
                    usaspending_api/broker/management/commands/update_transactions.py on lines 119..126

                    Duplicated Code

                    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                    Tuning

                    This issue has a mass of 113.

                    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                    Refactorings

                    Further Reading

                    File covid_faba_spending.py has 461 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                    COVID_FABA_SPENDING_COLUMNS = {
                        "id": {"delta": "INTEGER", "postgres": "INTEGER NOT NULL"},
                        "spending_level": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
                        "funding_toptier_agency_id": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
                        "funding_toptier_agency_code": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in usaspending_api/disaster/delta_models/covid_faba_spending.py - About 7 hrs to fix

                      Function initial_run has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          def initial_run(self, next_last_load):
                              """
                              Procedure to create & set up transaction_id_lookup and award_id_lookup tables and create other tables in
                              int database that will be populated by subsequent calls.
                              """
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in usaspending_api/etl/management/commands/load_transactions_in_delta.py - About 6 hrs to fix

                      Cognitive Complexity

                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                      Further reading

                      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method initial_run. (47)
                      Open

                          def initial_run(self, next_last_load):
                              """
                              Procedure to create & set up transaction_id_lookup and award_id_lookup tables and create other tables in
                              int database that will be populated by subsequent calls.
                              """

                      Cyclomatic Complexity

                      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

                      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

                      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
                      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
                      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
                      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
                      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
                      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
                      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
                      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
                      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
                      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
                      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
                      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

                      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

                      Function create_q_from_filter has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          def create_q_from_filter(self, filt):
                              if "combine_method" in filt:
                                  return self.create_q_from_filter_list(filt["filters"], filt["combine_method"])
                              else:
                                  q_kwargs = {}
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in usaspending_api/common/api_request_utils.py - About 6 hrs to fix

                      Cognitive Complexity

                      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                      Further reading

                      File populate_reporting_agency_overview.py has 420 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                      import logging
                      
                      from enum import Enum
                      
                      from django.core.management import BaseCommand
                        Severity
                        Category
                        Status
                        Source
                        Language