Showing 164 of 226 total issues
Function build_elasticsearch_result
has a Cognitive Complexity of 81 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_elasticsearch_result(self, response: dict) -> Dict[str, dict]:
results = {}
geo_info_buckets = response.get("group_by_agg_key", {}).get("buckets", [])
for bucket in geo_info_buckets:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File download_generation.py
has 631 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import json
import logging
import multiprocessing
import os
from copy import deepcopy
File award_search.py
has 631 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
from usaspending_api.awards.v2.lookups.lookups import award_type_mapping
AWARD_SEARCH_COLUMNS = {
"treasury_account_identifiers": {"delta": "ARRAY<INTEGER>", "postgres": "INTEGER[]", "gold": False},
"award_id": {"delta": "LONG NOT NULL", "postgres": "BIGINT NOT NULL", "gold": False},
File federal_accounts_v2.py
has 626 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import ast
from collections import OrderedDict
from typing import List
from django.db.models import DecimalField, Exists, F, Func, OuterRef, Q, Subquery, Sum
File delete_data.py
has 560 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import logging
from time import perf_counter
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Union
import pandas as pd
Function type_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_filter(_type, filters, limit=None):
_types = [
"budget_function",
"budget_subfunction",
"federal_account",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function subaward_filter. (63) Open
def subaward_filter(filters, for_downloads=False):
queryset = SubawardSearch.objects.all()
recipient_scope_q = Q(sub_legal_entity_country_code="USA") | Q(sub_legal_entity_country_name="UNITED STATES")
pop_scope_q = Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_co="USA") | Q(sub_place_of_perform_country_name="UNITED STATES")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
File disaster_base.py
has 504 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import json
from datetime import date
from functools import lru_cache
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
File conftest.py
has 477 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import logging
import os
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
File spending_by_geography.py
has 477 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import copy
import logging
from decimal import Decimal
from enum import Enum
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
File transaction_search.py
has 471 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
from django.contrib.postgres.fields import ArrayField
from django.db import models
from django.db.models import Q
from usaspending_api.common.custom_django_fields import NumericField
File spending_by_award.py
has 469 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import copy
from ast import literal_eval
from sys import maxsize
from typing import List
Function construct_es_response_for_prime_awards
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def construct_es_response_for_prime_awards(self, response) -> dict:
results = []
should_return_display_award_id = "Award ID" in self.fields
should_return_recipient_id = "recipient_id" in self.fields
for res in response:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if row["funding_agency_code"] is None or len(row["funding_agency_code"].strip()) < 1:
funding_subtier_agency_id = subtier_agency_map.get(row["funding_sub_tier_agency_co"])
if funding_subtier_agency_id is not None:
funding_toptier_agency_id = subtier_to_agency_map[funding_subtier_agency_id]["toptier_agency_id"]
funding_toptier_code = toptier_agency_map[funding_toptier_agency_id]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 113.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if row["funding_agency_code"] is None or len(row["funding_agency_code"].strip()) < 1:
funding_subtier_agency_id = subtier_agency_map.get(row["funding_sub_tier_agency_co"])
if funding_subtier_agency_id is not None:
funding_toptier_agency_id = subtier_to_agency_map[funding_subtier_agency_id][
"toptier_agency_id"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 113.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File covid_faba_spending.py
has 461 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
COVID_FABA_SPENDING_COLUMNS = {
"id": {"delta": "INTEGER", "postgres": "INTEGER NOT NULL"},
"spending_level": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
"funding_toptier_agency_id": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
"funding_toptier_agency_code": {"delta": "STRING", "postgres": "TEXT"},
Function initial_run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initial_run(self, next_last_load):
"""
Procedure to create & set up transaction_id_lookup and award_id_lookup tables and create other tables in
int database that will be populated by subsequent calls.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method initial_run. (47) Open
def initial_run(self, next_last_load):
"""
Procedure to create & set up transaction_id_lookup and award_id_lookup tables and create other tables in
int database that will be populated by subsequent calls.
"""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function create_q_from_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_q_from_filter(self, filt):
if "combine_method" in filt:
return self.create_q_from_filter_list(filt["filters"], filt["combine_method"])
else:
q_kwargs = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File populate_reporting_agency_overview.py
has 420 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import logging
from enum import Enum
from django.core.management import BaseCommand