Showing 105 of 124 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if err != nil {
logger.Error(err)
continue
}
Method raftWrapper.WaitForPeer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (rw *raftWrapper) WaitForPeer(ctx context.Context, pid string, depart bool) error {
ctx, span := trace.StartSpan(ctx, "consensus/raft/WaitForPeer")
defer span.End()
for {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PinOptions.Equals
has 12 return statements (exceeds 10 allowed). Open
func (po PinOptions) Equals(po2 PinOptions) bool {
if po.Name != po2.Name {
return false
}
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func NewAPIWithHost(ctx context.Context, cfg *Config, h host.Host) (*API, error) {
api := API{
config: cfg,
}
capi, err := common.NewAPIWithHost(ctx, &cfg.Config, h, api.routes)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func NewAPIWithHost(ctx context.Context, cfg *Config, h host.Host) (*API, error) {
api := API{
config: cfg,
}
capi, err := common.NewAPIWithHost(ctx, &cfg.Config, h, api.routes)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Cluster.filterMetrics
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) filterMetrics(ctx context.Context, mSet api.MetricsSet, numMetrics int, currentAllocs, priorityList, blacklist []peer.ID) classifiedMetrics {
curPeersMap := make(map[peer.ID][]api.Metric)
candPeersMap := make(map[peer.ID][]api.Metric)
prioPeersMap := make(map[peer.ID][]api.Metric)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method API.statusCidsHandler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *API) statusCidsHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(r.Context())
defer cancel()
queryValues := r.URL.Query()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Server.repoGCHandler
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (proxy *Server) repoGCHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
queryValues := r.URL.Query()
streamErrors := queryValues.Get("stream-errors") == "true"
// ignoring `quiet` since it only affects text output
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method partitionedMetric.chooseNext
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (pnedm *partitionedMetric) chooseNext() peer.ID {
lenp := len(pnedm.partitions)
if lenp == 0 {
return ""
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Pin.ProtoUnmarshal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (pin *Pin) ProtoUnmarshal(data []byte) error {
pbPin := pb.Pin{}
err := proto.Unmarshal(data, &pbPin)
if err != nil {
return err
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method API.SendResponse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (api *API) SendResponse(
w http.ResponseWriter,
status int,
err error,
resp interface{},
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Adder.AddAllAndPin
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (adder *Adder) AddAllAndPin(file files.Node) (ipld.Node, error) {
if err := adder.addFileNode("", file, true); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Tracker.opWorker
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (spt *Tracker) opWorker(pinF func(*optracker.Operation) error, prioCh, normalCh chan *optracker.Operation) {
var op *optracker.Operation
for {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Cluster.watchPinset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 15 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Cluster) watchPinset() {
ctx, span := trace.StartSpan(c.ctx, "cluster/watchPinset")
defer span.End()
stateSyncTimer := time.NewTimer(c.config.StateSyncInterval)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Your code does not pass gofmt in 2 places. Go fmt your code! Open
// Package balanced implements an allocator that can sort allocations
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
// Package pubsubmon implements a PeerMonitor component for IPFS Cluster that
- Exclude checks
exported method API.HealthHandler should have comment or be unexported Open
func (api *API) HealthHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
package pinsvcapi
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
// Package sharding implements a sharding ClusterDAGService places
- Exclude checks
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
// Package cmdutils contains utilities to facilitate building of command line
- Exclude checks