Showing 526 of 526 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func _Daemon_Status_Handler(srv interface{}, ctx context.Context, dec func(interface{}) error, interceptor grpc.UnaryServerInterceptor) (interface{}, error) {
in := new(StatusRequest)
if err := dec(in); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 221.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function SshJump
has 28 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func SshJump(ctx context.Context, conf *SshConfig, flags *pflag.FlagSet, print bool) (path string, err error) {
if conf.Addr == "" && conf.ConfigAlias == "" {
if flags != nil {
lookup := flags.Lookup("kubeconfig")
if lookup != nil {
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func DownloadFileWithName(uri, name string) (string, error) {
resp, err := getWithRetry(uri)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 220.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func DownloadFileWithName(uri, name string) (string, error) {
resp, err := getWithRetry(uri)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 220.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method Options.Connect
has 87 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (option *Options) Connect(ctx context.Context, sshConfig *pkgssh.SshConfig, transferImage bool, portBindings nat.PortMap) error {
switch option.ConnectMode {
case ConnectModeHost:
daemonCli := daemon.GetClient(false)
if daemonCli == nil {
Function CmdClone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func CmdClone(f cmdutil.Factory) *cobra.Command {
var options = handler.CloneOptions{}
var sshConf = &pkgssh.SshConfig{}
var extraRoute = &handler.ExtraRouteInfo{}
var transferImage bool
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
UnimplementedDaemonServer
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type UnimplementedDaemonServer struct {
}
Method Server.redirectToSudoDaemon
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (svr *Server) redirectToSudoDaemon(req *rpc.ConnectRequest, resp rpc.Daemon_ConnectServer) (e error) {
cli := svr.GetClient(true)
if cli == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("sudo daemon not start")
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
RunE: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
leave, err := daemon.GetClient(false).Leave(cmd.Context(), &rpc.LeaveRequest{
Workloads: args,
})
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 209.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
RunE: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
leave, err := daemon.GetClient(false).Remove(cmd.Context(), &rpc.RemoveRequest{
Workloads: args,
})
if err != nil {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 209.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function CmdSSH
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func CmdSSH(_ cmdutil.Factory) *cobra.Command {
var sshConf = &pkgssh.SshConfig{}
var ExtraCIDR []string
cmd := &cobra.Command{
Use: "ssh",
Function CmdGet
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func CmdGet(f cmdutil.Factory) *cobra.Command {
var printFlags = cmdget.NewGetPrintFlags()
cmd := &cobra.Command{
Use: "get",
Hidden: true,
Function legacyWaitExitOrRemoved
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func legacyWaitExitOrRemoved(ctx context.Context, apiClient client.APIClient, containerID string, waitRemove bool) <-chan int {
var removeErr error
statusChan := make(chan int)
exitCode := 125
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Server.redirectConnectForkToSudoDaemon
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (svr *Server) redirectConnectForkToSudoDaemon(req *rpc.ConnectRequest, resp rpc.Daemon_ConnectServer) (err error) {
cli := svr.GetClient(true)
if cli == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("sudo daemon not start")
}
Method admissionReviewHandler.handleCreate
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (h *admissionReviewHandler) handleCreate(ar v1.AdmissionReview) *v1.AdmissionResponse {
raw := ar.Request.Object.Raw
pod := corev1.Pod{}
deserializer := codecs.UniversalDeserializer()
if _, _, err := deserializer.Decode(raw, nil, &pod); err != nil {
File gssapi_ccache.go
has 508 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package ssh
import (
"bytes"
"encoding/binary"
Method CCache.writeCredential
has 24 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (c *CCache) writeCredential(cred *Credential, endian *binary.ByteOrder) ([]byte, error) {
var byteString bytes.Buffer
var err error
b := &byteString
daemonClient
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type daemonClient struct {
cc grpc.ClientConnInterface
}
Function runContainer
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func runContainer(ctx context.Context, dockerCli command.Cli, runConfig *RunConfig) error {
config := runConfig.config
stdout, stderr := dockerCli.Out(), dockerCli.Err()
apiClient := dockerCli.Client()
Method Server.ConnectFork
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (svr *Server) ConnectFork(req *rpc.ConnectRequest, resp rpc.Daemon_ConnectForkServer) (err error) {
defer func() {
util.InitLoggerForServer(true)
log.SetOutput(svr.LogFile)
config.Debug = false