Showing 526 of 526 total issues
Method ConnectOptions.addRouteDynamic has 78 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *ConnectOptions) addRouteDynamic(ctx context.Context) error {
tunName, e := c.GetTunDeviceName()
if e != nil {
return e
}Method Options.Connect has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (option *Options) Connect(ctx context.Context, sshConfig *pkgssh.SshConfig, transferImage bool, portBindings nat.PortMap) error {
switch option.ConnectMode {
case ConnectModeHost:
daemonCli := daemon.GetClient(false)
if daemonCli == nil {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ConnectOptions.portForward has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *ConnectOptions) portForward(ctx context.Context, portPair []string) error {
firstCtx, firstCancelFunc := context.WithCancel(ctx)
defer firstCancelFunc()
var errChan = make(chan error, 1)
go func() {Method Options.CreateConnectContainer has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (option *Options) CreateConnectContainer(portBindings nat.PortMap) (*RunConfig, error) {
portMap, portSet, err := option.GetExposePort(portBindings)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}Function createTun has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func createTun(cfg Config) (conn net.Conn, itf *net.Interface, err error) {
if cfg.Addr == "" && cfg.Addr6 == "" {
err = fmt.Errorf("IPv4 address and IPv6 address can not be empty at same time")
return
}Function NewKubeVPNCommand has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NewKubeVPNCommand() *cobra.Command {
var cmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "kubevpn",
Short: i18n.T("KubeVPN offers a Cloud-Native Dev Environment that seamlessly connects to your Kubernetes cluster network."),
Long: templates.LongDesc(`Method ConnectOptions.startLocalTunServe has 73 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *ConnectOptions) startLocalTunServe(ctx context.Context, forwardAddress string, lite bool) (err error) {
log.Debugf("IPv4: %s, IPv6: %s", c.localTunIPv4.IP.String(), c.localTunIPv6.IP.String())
var cidrList []*net.IPNet
if !lite {Function run has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func run(ctx context.Context, cli *client.Client, dockerCli *command.DockerCli, runConfig *RunConfig) (id string, err error) {
rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().UnixNano()))
var config = runConfig.config
var hostConfig = runConfig.hostConfigFunction createTun has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func createTun(cfg Config) (conn net.Conn, itf *net.Interface, err error) {
if cfg.Addr == "" && cfg.Addr6 == "" {
err = fmt.Errorf("IPv4 address and IPv6 address can not be empty at same time")
return
}Function file_dhcpserver_proto_init has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func file_dhcpserver_proto_init() {
if File_dhcpserver_proto != nil {
return
}
if !protoimpl.UnsafeEnabled {Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Connect(ctx context.Context, in *ConnectRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_ConnectClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[0], Daemon_Connect_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) ConnectFork(ctx context.Context, in *ConnectRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_ConnectForkClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[1], Daemon_ConnectFork_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Proxy(ctx context.Context, in *ConnectRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_ProxyClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[3], Daemon_Proxy_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Clone(ctx context.Context, in *CloneRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_CloneClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[5], Daemon_Clone_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Disconnect(ctx context.Context, in *DisconnectRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_DisconnectClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[2], Daemon_Disconnect_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Leave(ctx context.Context, in *LeaveRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_LeaveClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[4], Daemon_Leave_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Remove(ctx context.Context, in *RemoveRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_RemoveClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[6], Daemon_Remove_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Logs(ctx context.Context, in *LogRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_LogsClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[8], Daemon_Logs_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Reset(ctx context.Context, in *ResetRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_ResetClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[9], Daemon_Reset_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *daemonClient) Quit(ctx context.Context, in *QuitRequest, opts ...grpc.CallOption) (Daemon_QuitClient, error) {
stream, err := c.cc.NewStream(ctx, &Daemon_ServiceDesc.Streams[10], Daemon_Quit_FullMethodName, opts...)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76