Showing 254 of 254 total issues
Function from_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def from_files(cls, folder: str) -> _VictorUtils: # future.annotation is active, so no cyclical.
"""
This creates an instance form the output files. Likely to be unstable.
Assumes the checkpoints were not altered.
And is basically for analysis only.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_completed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_completed(self, futures: pebble.ProcessMapFuture) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
A pebble.ProcessMapFuture cannot be stored as an instance attribute as it's not picklable
as it handles the lock. As a result it must be passed.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
mRMSD
has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class mRMSD:
"""Mols are non-superposed ('aligned') for the RMSD and in Å.
The RMSD has been calculated differently.
The inbuilt RMSD calculations in RDKit (``Chem.rdMolAlign.GetBestRMS``) align the two molecules,
Function _is_connected_warhead
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _is_connected_warhead(self, atom, anchor_atom):
if not atom.HasProp('_Warhead'):
return False
elif atom.GetBoolProp('_Warhead') == False:
return False
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _mapping_from_annotated_and_hits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _mapping_from_annotated_and_hits(cls,
annotated_followup: Chem.Mol,
hits: Sequence[Chem.Mol]):
assert cls.is_origin_annotated(annotated_followup), 'This molecules is not annotated.'
mappings = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function combine_for_bondorder
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def combine_for_bondorder(template: Chem.Mol, target: Chem.Mol) -> Chem.Mol:
target2template = {}
for template_ai, template_atom in enumerate(template.GetAtoms()):
target_atom: Chem.Atom = get_equivalent(template_atom, target)
target_ai: int = target_atom.GetIdx()
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pipeline
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pipeline(self, args: argparse.Namespace):
"""
Performs a pipeline run of fragmenstein:
places the hits against themselves as a reference ("replace") to get a baseline score
combines the hits,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function overannotate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def overannotate(cls, mol: Chem.Mol, hits: List[Chem.Mol], priority=('mol_origin', 'atom_origin', 'xyz')):
"""
Unfortunately, in an attempt to make users happy, I have to make the code more complicated.
There are three different annotation systems going on.
The first is the property '_Origin' in the ``Chem.Mol``.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convert_origins_to_custom_map
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_origins_to_custom_map(self, mol: Optional[Chem.Mol] = None, forbiddance=True) -> Dict[
str, Dict[int, int]]:
"""
The origins stored in the followup differ in format from the custom_map.
The former is a list of lists of hit_name+atom_index,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function calculate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calculate(self, accounted_for: set):
"""perform the calculations"""
# ---- sorters --------------------
goodness_sorter = self.goodness_sorter_factory(3)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __call__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self, # noqa signature matches... it is just Boost being Boost
parameters: rdFMCS.MCSAtomCompareParameters,
mol1: Chem.Mol,
atom_idx1: int,
mol2: Chem.Mol,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_attachment_from_pdbblock_via_pymol
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_attachment_from_pdbblock_via_pymol(self) -> Union[None, Chem.Mol]:
"""
DEPRACATED. FORMER CODE FOR ``_get_attachment_from_pdbblock``
Yes, yes, I see the madness in using pymol to get an atom for rdkit to make a pose for pyrosetta.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function copy_all_possible_origins
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy_all_possible_origins(cls, annotated: Chem.Mol, target: Chem.Mol) -> Tuple[List[Chem.Mol], List[List[int]]]:
"""
Monster leaves a note of what it did. atom prop _Origin is a json of a list of mol _Name dot AtomIdx.
However, the atom order seems to be maintained but I dont trust it. Also dummy atoms are stripped.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _add_warhead_mapping
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _add_warhead_mapping(self, custom_map: Dict[str, IndexMap]) -> Dict[str, IndexMap]:
"""
Add the warhead mapping to the custom_map.
Does not use the warhead definition as it may be missing.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function by_expansion
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def by_expansion(self, primary_name: Optional[str] = None, min_mode_index: int = 0) -> Chem.Mol:
"""
Get the maps. Find the map with the most atoms covered.
Use that map as the base map for the other maps.
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function flip_mapping
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def flip_mapping(mapping):
"""
This is a temporary fix for the fact that many route run on mappings that go hit to followup or viceversa
Moving forward these will be replaced with a single hit to followup scheme, of type IndexMap
"""
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _renumber_original_indices
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _renumber_original_indices(self, mol: Chem.Mol,
mapping: Dict[int, int],
name_restriction: Optional[str] = None):
"""
Renumbers the indices in the ring virtual atom to new mapping.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function posthoc_refine
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def posthoc_refine(self,
scaffold: Chem.Mol,
indices: Optional[List[int]] = None) -> Chem.Mol:
"""
Given a scaffold and a list of indices, refine the scaffold.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self,
hits: List[Chem.Mol],
pdb_filename: Union[None, str] = None,
pdb_block: Union[None, str] = None,
ligand_resn: str = 'LIG',
Function check_possible_distances
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_possible_distances(self, other, possible_map, combined, combined_map, cutoff=2.5):
for i, offset_o in possible_map.items():
unoffset_o = offset_o - combined.GetNumAtoms()
atom = self.followup.GetAtomWithIdx(i)
for neigh in atom.GetNeighbors():
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"