Showing 3,395 of 3,395 total issues
File auth.js
has 683 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _ = require('underscore');
var utils = require('../utils/utils.js');
var files = require('../fs/files');
var config = require('./config.js');
var httpHelpers = require('../utils/http-helpers.js');
File deploy.js
has 678 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// URL parsing and validation
// RPC to server (endpoint, arguments)
// see if RPC requires password
// prompt for password
// send RPC with or without password as required
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
History.replaceState = function(data,title,url,queue){
//History.debug('History.replaceState: called', arguments);
// Check the State
if ( History.getHashByUrl(url) && History.emulated.pushState ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 280.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
History.pushState = function(data,title,url,queue){
//History.debug('History.pushState: called', arguments);
// Check the State
if ( History.getHashByUrl(url) && History.emulated.pushState ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 280.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File input-tests.js
has 669 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var CS = ConstraintSolver;
// "Input tests" are the new style of tests that operate by creating a
// CS.Input (representing a problem statement) and passing it into
// CS.PackagesResolver.
Function _runOnce
has a Cognitive Complexity of 75 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_runOnce: function (options) {
var self = this;
options = options || {};
var firstRun = options.firstRun;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File match_test.js
has 659 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Tinytest.add('check - check', test => {
const matches = (value, pattern) => {
let error;
try {
check(value, pattern);
File project.js
has 651 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import _ from 'underscore';
import util from 'util';
import assert from 'assert';
import chalk from 'chalk';
import semver from 'semver';
File amplify.js
has 647 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Amplify 1.1.2
*
* Copyright 2011 - 2013 appendTo LLC. (http://appendto.com/team)
* Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL licenses.
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
groupTestNames.forEach((names, i) => {
const escapedNames = names.map(
name => name.replace(/['"-\/\\^$*+?.()|[\]{}]/g, '\\$&')
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 265.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
groupTestNames.forEach((names, i) => {
const escapedNames = names.map(
name => name.replace(/['"-\/\\^$*+?.()|[\]{}]/g, '\\$&')
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 265.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File oplog_observe_driver.js
has 636 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { oplogV2V1Converter } from "./oplog_v2_converter";
var Future = Npm.require('fibers/future');
var PHASE = {
File accounts_tests.js
has 636 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Mongo } from 'meteor/mongo';
import { URL } from 'meteor/url';
import { Meteor } from 'meteor/meteor';
import { Accounts } from 'meteor/accounts-base';
import { Random } from 'meteor/random';
Function _observeFromObserveChanges
has a Cognitive Complexity of 71 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
LocalCollection._observeFromObserveChanges = (cursor, observeCallbacks) => {
const transform = cursor.getTransform() || (doc => doc);
let suppressed = !!observeCallbacks._suppress_initial;
let observeChangesCallbacks;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File compiler.js
has 630 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _ = require('underscore');
var archinfo = require('../utils/archinfo');
var buildmessage = require('../utils/buildmessage.js');
var isopack = require('./isopack.js');
Function runWebAppServer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 70 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function runWebAppServer() {
var shuttingDown = false;
var syncQueue = new Meteor._SynchronousQueue();
var getItemPathname = function(itemUrl) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function d3_geom_voronoiTessellate
has 268 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function d3_geom_voronoiTessellate(points, callback) {
var Sites = {
list: points.map(function(v, i) {
return {
index: i,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
d3.max = function(array, f) {
var i = -1, n = array.length, a, b;
if (arguments.length === 1) {
while (++i < n && ((a = array[i]) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && b > a) a = b;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 248.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
d3.min = function(array, f) {
var i = -1, n = array.length, a, b;
if (arguments.length === 1) {
while (++i < n && ((a = array[i]) == null || a != a)) a = undefined;
while (++i < n) if ((b = array[i]) != null && a > b) a = b;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 248.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File password_server.js
has 595 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { hash as bcryptHash, compare as bcryptCompare } from 'bcrypt';
import { Accounts } from "meteor/accounts-base";
// Utility for grabbing user
const getUserById = (id, options) => Meteor.users.findOne(id, Accounts._addDefaultFieldSelector(options));