Showing 337 of 337 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const UI = {
authn: require('../authn/authn'),
icons: require('../iconBase'),
log: require('../log'),
ns: require('../ns'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const UI = {
authn: require('../authn/authn'),
icons: require('../iconBase'),
log: require('../log'),
ns: require('../ns'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const UI = {
authn: require('../authn/authn'),
icons: require('../iconBase'),
log: require('../log'),
ns: require('../ns'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Column
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Column () {
this.useCount = 0
// Have we checked any values for this column yet?
Function renderItem
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function renderItem (object) {
async function deleteThisItem () {
if (ordered) {
console.log('pre delete: ' + debugString(list.elements))
for (let i = 0; i < list.elements.length; i++) {
Function getACLorDefault
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function getACLorDefault (
doc: $rdf.NamedNode,
callbackFunction: (
a: boolean,
b: boolean,
Function loginStatusBox
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function loginStatusBox (
dom: HTMLDocument,
listener: ((uri: string | null) => void) | null = null,
options: {
buttonStyle?: string
Function wrapper
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var wrapper = function () {
var logger = {}
// /////////////////////// Logging
//
Function ensureOneTypeIndex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function ensureOneTypeIndex (context: AuthenticationContext, isPublic: boolean): Promise<AuthenticationContext | void> {
async function makeIndexIfNecessary (context, isPublic) {
const relevant = isPublic ? context.publicProfile : context.preferencesFile
const visibility = isPublic ? 'public' : 'private'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onChange
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var onChange = function (_e) {
select.disabled = true // until data written back - gives user feedback too
var ds = []
var is = []
var removeValue = function (t) {
Function makeDescription
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
forms.makeDescription = function (
dom,
kb,
subject,
predicate,
Function registrationControl
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function registrationControl (
context: AuthenticationContext,
instance,
klass
): Promise<AuthenticationContext | void> {
Function sameACL
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function sameACL (a: AgentMapMap, b: AgentMapMap): boolean {
const contains = function (a, b) {
for (const pred in {
agent: true,
agentClass: true,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function label
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function label (x, initialCap) {
// x is an object
function doCap (s) {
// s = s.toString()
if (initialCap) return s.slice(0, 1).toUpperCase() + s.slice(1)
Function renderMessage
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var renderMessage = function (bindings, fresh) {
var creator = bindings['?creator']
var message = bindings['?msg']
var date = bindings['?date']
var content = bindings['?content']
Function renderMessage
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var renderMessage = function (bindings, fresh) {
var creator = bindings['?creator']
var message = bindings['?msg']
var date = bindings['?date']
var content = bindings['?content']
Function logInLoadPreferences
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function logInLoadPreferences (context: AuthenticationContext): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
if (context.preferencesFile) return Promise.resolve(context) // already done
const statusArea = context.statusArea || context.div || null
let progressDisplay
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var UI = {
authn: require('./authn/authn'),
icons: require('./iconBase'),
log: require('./log'),
ns: require('./ns'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var UI = {
authn: require('../authn/authn'),
icons: require('../iconBase'),
log: require('../log'),
ns: require('../ns'),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function updateStore
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var updateStore = function (part) {
var chunk = part.subject
setPartStyle(part, undefined, true)
var old = kb.any(chunk, ns.sioc('content')).value
var del = [$rdf.st(chunk, ns.sioc('content'), old, padDoc)]