Showing 333 of 333 total issues
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function send
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: EmailRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { id, userId, from, replyTo, subject, html, text, headers, to, cc, bcc, attachments } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const form = new FormData()
form.append('from', from)
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 16:
response = _context.sent;
if (!response.ok) {
_context.next = 29;
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 13:
response = _context.sent;
if (!response.ok) {
_context.next = 21;
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 17:
response = _context.sent;
if (!response.ok) {
_context.next = 27;
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 15:
response = _context.sent;
if (!response.ok) {
_context.next = 27;
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 13:
response = _context.sent;
if (!response.ok) {
_context.next = 21;
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _callee$
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_recursiveTry = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(providers, request) {
var _providers, current, others, id;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Function strategyProvidersNoFallback
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var strategyProvidersNoFallback = function strategyProvidersNoFallback(_ref) {
var _ref2 = (0, _slicedToArray2["default"])(_ref, 1),
provider = _ref2[0];
return /*#__PURE__*/function () {
var _ref3 = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
Function senders
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.senders = (0, _keys["default"])(strategies).reduce(function (acc, channel) {
acc[channel] = _this.providers[channel].length > 0 ? strategies[channel](_this.providers[channel]) : (/*#__PURE__*/function () {
var _ref = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var provider;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
Function _callee2
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee2(request) {
var resultsByChannel, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee2$(_context2) {
while (1) switch (_context2.prev = _context2.next) {
case 0:
Function _callee
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref2, subscription, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Function factory
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function factory(_ref) {
var type = _ref.type,
config = (0, _objectWithoutProperties2["default"])(_ref, _excluded);
switch (type) {
// Development
Function _callee
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, customize, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Function send
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { from, to, text } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://api.infobip.com/sms/1/text/single', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
Function _callee
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, customize, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0: