Showing 333 of 333 total issues
Function mergeWithDefaultConfig
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function mergeWithDefaultConfig(_ref) {
var channels = _ref.channels,
rest = (0, _objectWithoutProperties2["default"])(_ref, _excluded);
return _objectSpread(_objectSpread({
useNotificationCatcher: false
Function value
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee2(request) {
var resultsByChannel, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee2$(_context2) {
while (1) switch (_context2.prev = _context2.next) {
Function _recursiveTry
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _recursiveTry() {
_recursiveTry = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(providers, request) {
var _providers, current, others, id;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: EmailRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { id, userId, from, replyTo, subject, html, text, headers, to, cc, bcc, attachments } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
const response = await fetch('https://mandrillapp.com/api/1.0/messages/send.json', {
method: 'POST',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: WhatsappRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { from, to, type, messageId, text, mediaUrl, templateName, templateData, ...rest } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
// Construct the payload
const payload = {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: VoiceRequestType): Promise<string> {
const {
from,
to,
url,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function send
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: WhatsappRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { from, to, type, messageId, text, mediaUrl, templateName, templateData, ...rest } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
// Construct the payload
const payload = {
Function value
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, customize, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, customize, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref2, subscription, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function _callee$
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, text;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const { from, text, to, type, ttl, messageClass } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const { from, to, text, type, ttl, messageClass } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (shouldCache) {
cachedSecret[cacheKey] = signingKey;
cacheQueue.push(cacheKey);
if (cacheQueue.length > maxCacheEntries) {
// remove the oldest entry (not the least recently used)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (shouldCache) {
cachedSecret[cacheKey] = signingKey
cacheQueue.push(cacheKey)
if (cacheQueue.length > maxCacheEntries) {
// remove the oldest entry (not the least recently used)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _recursiveTry
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function _recursiveTry() {
_recursiveTry = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(providers, request) {
var _providers, current, others, id;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function _callee$
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;