Showing 333 of 333 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
constructor ({ apiUsername, apiPassword }: Object) {
this.apiKey = Buffer.from(`${apiUsername}:${apiPassword}`).toString('base64')
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
constructor ({ login, password }: Object) {
this.apiKey = Buffer.from(`${login}:${password}`).toString('base64')
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
constructor ({ username, password }: Object) {
this.apiKey = Buffer.from(`${username}:${password}`).toString('base64')
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const { id, userId, from, to, text, type, nature } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const { to, from, html, text, subject, replyTo, attachments } =
request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
hexEncodedBodyHash () {
const request = this.request
if (request.headers['X-Amz-Content-Sha256']) {
return request.headers['X-Amz-Content-Sha256']
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
value: function hexEncodedBodyHash() {
var request = this.request;
if (request.headers['X-Amz-Content-Sha256']) {
return request.headers['X-Amz-Content-Sha256'];
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 68.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, registrationToken, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, registrationToken, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, to, from, text;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, to, from, url;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function send
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: EmailRequestType): Promise<string> {
if (
request.text &&
typeof request.text !== 'string' &&
!(request.text instanceof Buffer) &&
Function _callee$
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
if (!request.customize) {
_context.next = 6;
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, registrationToken, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function value
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, registrationToken, rest, result;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function _callee4$
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee4$(_context4) {
while (1) switch (_context4.prev = _context4.next) {
case 0:
return _context4.abrupt("return", _promise["default"].all((0, _keys["default"])(request).filter(function (channel) {
return _this2.channels.includes(channel);
Function send
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
const { appKey, consumerKey, account, host } = this.credentials
const timestamp = Math.round(Date.now() / 1000)
// Documentation: https://api.ovh.com/console/#/sms/%7BserviceName%7D/jobs#POST
Function value
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
value: function () {
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, text;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
Function _callee
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var _send = (0, _asyncToGenerator2["default"])(/*#__PURE__*/_regenerator["default"].mark(function _callee(request) {
var _ref, from, to, text, rest;
return _regenerator["default"].wrap(function _callee$(_context) {
while (1) switch (_context.prev = _context.next) {
case 0:
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (message.status.groupId === 1) {
return message.messageId
} else {
const error = message.status
throw new Error(Object.keys(error).map((key) => `${key}: ${error[key]}`).join(', '))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76