Showing 394 of 429 total issues
Method validate_target_for_package_command_exists!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_target_for_package_command_exists!
@project = nil
@package = nil
follow_project_links = SOURCE_UNTOUCHED_COMMANDS.include?(@command)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find(xpath)
# logger.debug "---------------------- parsing xpath: #{xpath} -----------------------"
begin
@stack = @lexer.parse xpath
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method destroy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def destroy
@comment = Comment.find(params[:id])
authorize @comment, :destroy?
@commentable = @comment.commentable
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_events
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_events
Event::Base.transaction do
data = type = nil
@last.elements('notification') do |e|
type = e['type']
Method update_generic_relationships
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_generic_relationships(xmlhash)
# we remember the current relationships in a hash
cache = {}
relationships.each do |purr|
next if @updater.ignore?(purr)
Method extend_packages_to_link
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extend_packages_to_link(p)
return unless p[:package].is_a?(Package) # only for local packages
pkg = p[:package]
if pkg.is_link?
Method statistic
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def statistic
result = backend_statistics
return if result.blank?
disk = result.dig('disk', 'usage')
Method has_local_permission?
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_local_permission?(perm_string, object)
roles = Role.ids_with_permission(perm_string)
return false unless roles
parent = nil
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class RelationshipCreate < Relationship
self.message_bus_routing_key = 'relationship.create'
self.description = 'Relationship created'
receiver_roles :any_role
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class RelationshipDelete < Relationship
self.message_bus_routing_key = 'relationship.delete'
self.description = 'Relationship deleted'
receiver_roles :any_role
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method run
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(xmlhash, force = nil)
project.check_write_access!
# check for raising read access permissions, which can't get ensured atm
raise ForbiddenError if !(project.new_record? || project.disabled_for?('access', nil, nil)) && (FlagHelper.xml_disabled_for?(xmlhash, 'access') && !User.admin_session?)
Method branch_remote_repositories
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def branch_remote_repositories(project)
remote_project = Project.new(name: project)
remote_project_meta = Nokogiri::XML(remote_project.meta.content, &:strict)
local_project_meta = Nokogiri::XML(render_xml, &:strict)
Method release_package_create_main_package
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def release_package_create_main_package(request, source_package, target_package_name, target_project)
base_package_name = target_package_name.gsub(/\.[^.]*$/, '')
# only if package does not contain a _patchinfo file
lpkg = nil
Method resample
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.resample(values, samples = 400)
values.sort_by! { |a| a[0] }
result = []
return result if values.empty?
Method index
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
if request.post? && !params[:project].nil? && Project.valid_name?(params[:project])
redirect_to project: params[:project]
else
begin
Method create
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
authorize @package, :update?
files = params[:files] || []
filename = params[:filename]
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Confirmed
def payload
default_payload.merge(
event: 'pull_request',
commit_sha: webhook_payload.dig(:pull_request, :head, :sha),
pr_number: webhook_payload[:number],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Confirmed
def payload
default_payload.merge(
event: 'pull_request',
commit_sha: webhook_payload.dig(:pull_request, :head, :sha),
pr_number: webhook_payload[:number],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update
authorize @project, :update?
respond_to do |format|
if @project.update(project_params)
format.html do
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update
authorize @package, :update?
respond_to do |format|
if @package.update(package_details_params)
format.html do
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76