Sign upLogin

pazz/alot

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 271 of 275 total issues

Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, address=None, aliases=None, alias_regexp=None,
                 realname=None, gpg_key=None, signature=None,
                 signature_filename=None, signature_as_attachment=False,
                 sent_box=None, sent_tags=None, draft_box=None,
                 draft_tags=None, replied_tags=None, passed_tags=None,
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/account.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_mode_docs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def get_mode_docs():
    docs = {}
    b = alot.buffers.Buffer
    for entry in alot.buffers.__dict__.values():
        if isinstance(entry, type):
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/generate_commands.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function rebuild has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def rebuild(self, reverse=False, restore_focus=True):
        self.isinitialized = True
        self.reversed = reverse
        selected_thread = None
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/buffers/search.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, content, key_attr, value_attr, gaps_attr=None):
        """
        :param headerslist: list of key/value pairs to display
        :type headerslist: list of (str, str)
        :param key_attr: theming attribute to use for keys
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/widgets/thread.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _refresh has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _refresh(self, thread):
        self._total_messages = len(thread)
        self._notmuch_authors_string = thread.authors

        subject_type = settings.get('thread_subject')
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/thread.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function account_matching_address has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def account_matching_address(self, address, return_default=False):
        """returns :class:`Account` for a given email address (str)

        :param str address: address to look up. A realname part will be ignored.
        :param bool return_default: If True and no address can be found, then
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/settings/manager.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_deep_focus has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_deep_focus(self, startfrom=None):
        """return the bottom most focussed widget of the widget tree"""
        if not startfrom:
            startfrom = self.current_buffer
        if 'get_focus' in dir(startfrom):
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/ui.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, dbman, msg, thread=None):
        """
        :param dbman: db manager that is used for further lookups
        :type dbman: alot.db.DBManager
        :param msg: the wrapped message
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/message.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_contacts has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_contacts(self):
        c = self._config
        res = []
        for id in c.sections:
            for email in c[id]['email']:
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/addressbook/abook.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_messages has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_messages(self):
        """
        returns all messages in this thread as dict mapping all contained
        messages to their direct responses.
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/thread.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Do not use bare 'except'
Open

        except:
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/settings/manager.py by pep8

When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.

Okay: except Exception:
Okay: except BaseException:
E722: except:

Line break after binary operator
Open

        elif (m.get_content_subtype() == 'encrypted' and
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/utils.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

            'default': False,
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/commands/search.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Line break after binary operator
Open

                                      stat.S_ISFIFO(os.stat(path).st_mode) or
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/utils/argparse.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Module level import not at top of file
Open

import alot
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/conf.py by pep8

Place imports at the top of the file.

Always put imports at the top of the file, just after any module
comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants.

Okay: import os
Okay: # this is a comment\nimport os
Okay: '''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay: r'''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nelse:\n\tpass\nimport y
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nfinally:\n\tpass\nimport y
E402: a=1\nimport os
E402: 'One string'\n"Two string"\nimport os
E402: a=1\nfrom sys import x

Okay: if x:\n    import os

Module level import not at top of file
Open

from alot.utils.argparse import BooleanAction
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/generate_commands.py by pep8

Place imports at the top of the file.

Always put imports at the top of the file, just after any module
comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants.

Okay: import os
Okay: # this is a comment\nimport os
Okay: '''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay: r'''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nelse:\n\tpass\nimport y
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nfinally:\n\tpass\nimport y
E402: a=1\nimport os
E402: 'One string'\n"Two string"\nimport os
E402: a=1\nfrom sys import x

Okay: if x:\n    import os

Closing bracket does not match indentation of opening bracket's line
Open

                ]),
Severity: Minor
Found in extra/colour_picker.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Line break after binary operator
Open

        if (m.get_content_subtype() == 'signed' and
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/utils.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

            'help': 'retag all messages that match the current query'}),
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/commands/search.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Missing whitespace around arithmetic operator
Open

        modefilename = mode+'.rst'
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/generate_commands.py by pep8

Surround operators with a single space on either side.

- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
  either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
  comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
  Booleans (and, or, not).

- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
  whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.

Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]

E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language