Sign upLogin

pazz/alot

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 268 of 272 total issues

Function prepare_string has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def prepare_string(partname, thread, maxw):
    """
    extract a content string for part 'partname' from 'thread' of maximal
    length 'maxw'.
    """
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/widgets/search.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function account_matching_address has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def account_matching_address(self, address, return_default=False):
        """returns :class:`Account` for a given email address (str)

        :param str address: address to look up. A realname part will be ignored.
        :param bool return_default: If True and no address can be found, then
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/settings/manager.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, address=None, aliases=None, alias_regexp=None,
                 realname=None, gpg_key=None, signature=None,
                 signature_filename=None, signature_as_attachment=False,
                 sent_box=None, sent_tags=None, draft_box=None,
                 draft_tags=None, replied_tags=None, passed_tags=None,
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/account.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def __init__(self, dbman, msg, thread=None):
        """
        :param dbman: db manager that is used for further lookups
        :type dbman: alot.db.DBManager
        :param msg: the wrapped message
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/message.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def apply(self, ui):
        if not self.thread:
            self.thread = ui.current_buffer.get_selected_thread()
        if self.thread:
            query = settings.get('thread_unfold_matching')
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/commands/search.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _get_headers has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _get_headers(self):
        if self.display_all_headers is True:
            if self._all_headers_tree is None:
                self._all_headers_tree = self.construct_header_pile()
            ret = self._all_headers_tree
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/widgets/thread.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function get_contacts has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_contacts(self):
        c = self._config
        res = []
        for id in c.sections:
            for email in c[id]['email']:
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/addressbook/abook.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _set_attachments has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def _set_attachments(self):
        if self.attach:
            for gpath in self.attach:
                for a in glob.glob(gpath):
                    self.envelope.attach(a)
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/commands/globals.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function matches_address has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def matches_address(self, address):
        """returns whether this account knows about an email address

        :param str address: address to look up
        :rtype: bool
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/account.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function rebuild has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def rebuild(self, reverse=False, restore_focus=True):
        self.isinitialized = True
        self.reversed = reverse
        selected_thread = None
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/buffers/search.py - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Line break after binary operator
Open

                not key_uid.revoked and
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/crypto.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Line break after binary operator
Open

                elif (sub.get_content_subtype() == 'encrypted' and
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/utils.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
Open

  ('index', 'alot.tex', 'alot Documentation',
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/conf.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Line break after binary operator
Open

    if (os.path.exists(path) and not (os.path.isfile(path) or
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/utils/argparse.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)

Ambiguous variable name 'l'
Open

        for l in lines:
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/addressbook/external.py by pep8

Never use the characters 'l', 'O', or 'I' as variable names.

In some fonts, these characters are indistinguishable from the
numerals one and zero. When tempted to use 'l', use 'L' instead.

Okay: L = 0
Okay: o = 123
Okay: i = 42
E741: l = 0
E741: O = 123
E741: I = 42

Variables can be bound in several other contexts, including class
and function definitions, 'global' and 'nonlocal' statements,
exception handlers, and 'with' and 'for' statements.
In addition, we have a special handling for function parameters.

Okay: except AttributeError as o:
Okay: with lock as L:
Okay: foo(l=12)
Okay: for a in foo(l=12):
E741: except AttributeError as O:
E741: with lock as l:
E741: global I
E741: nonlocal l
E741: def foo(l):
E741: def foo(l=12):
E741: l = foo(l=12)
E741: for l in range(10):
E742: class I(object):
E743: def l(x):

Module level import not at top of file
Open

import alot.buffers
Severity: Minor
Found in docs/source/generate_commands.py by pep8

Place imports at the top of the file.

Always put imports at the top of the file, just after any module
comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants.

Okay: import os
Okay: # this is a comment\nimport os
Okay: '''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay: r'''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nelse:\n\tpass\nimport y
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nfinally:\n\tpass\nimport y
E402: a=1\nimport os
E402: 'One string'\n"Two string"\nimport os
E402: a=1\nfrom sys import x

Okay: if x:\n    import os

Do not use bare 'except'
Open

            except:
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/manager.py by pep8

When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.

Okay: except Exception:
Okay: except BaseException:
E722: except:

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

                            sort=self._sort_orders[sort],
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/db/manager.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Continuation line under-indented for visual indent
Open

            'default': False,
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/commands/search.py by pep8

Continuation lines indentation.

Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.

When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
  as a continuation line.

Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n    )

Okay: a = (\n    42)
E121: a = (\n   42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n    42\n    )
E124: a = (24,\n     42\n)
E125: if (\n    b):\n    pass
E126: a = (\n        42)
E127: a = (24,\n      42)
E128: a = (24,\n    42)
E129: if (a or\n    b):\n    pass
E131: a = (\n    42\n 24)

Line break after binary operator
Open

                self.edit_text = (self.edit_text[:start_pos] +
Severity: Minor
Found in alot/widgets/globals.py by pep8

Avoid breaks after binary operators.

The preferred place to break around a binary operator is before the
operator, not after it.

W504: (width == 0 +\n height == 0)
W504: (width == 0 and\n height == 0)
W504: var = (1 &\n       ~2)

Okay: foo(\n    -x)
Okay: foo(x\n    [])
Okay: x = '''\n''' + ''
Okay: x = '' + '''\n'''
Okay: foo(x,\n    -y)
Okay: foo(x,  # comment\n    -y)

The following should be W504 but unary_context is tricky with these
Okay: var = (1 /\n       -2)
Okay: var = (1 +\n       -1 +\n       -2)
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language