Showing 151 of 164 total issues
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if start + end - i - i == 1 and (end - start + 1) % 2 == 0:
# Apply required gate if control and target are
# adjacent to each other, provided |control-target|
# is even.
if end == gate.controls[0]:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if len(gate.targets) > 1:
if gate.name == "SWAP":
if _swap_processing:
col.append(r" \qswap \qw")
continue
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (
N + start - end - i - i == 1
and (N - end + start + 1) % 2 == 0
):
temp.add_gate(gate.name, [i, i + 1])
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if end == gate.controls[0]:
temp.gates.append(
Gate(gate.name, targets=[i], controls=[i + 1])
)
else:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if end == gate.controls[0]:
temp.gates.append(
Gate(
gate.name,
targets=[i + 1],
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (
N + start - end - i - i == 1
and (N - end + start + 1) % 2 == 0
):
if end == gate.controls[0]:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if start + end - i - i == 1 and (end - start + 1) % 2 == 0:
qc_t.add_gate(gate.name, [i, i + 1])
elif (start + end - i - i) == 2 and (
end - start + 1
) % 2 == 1:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if j < N - end - 2:
if gate.name in ["CNOT", "CSIGN"]:
qc_t.add_gate(
gate.name,
end + gate.targets[0],
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (
N + start - end - i - i == 1
and (N - end + start + 1) % 2 == 0
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (
N + start - end - i - i == 1
and (N - end + start + 1) % 2 == 0
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _get_qobjevo_helper
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_qobjevo_helper(self, spline_kind, dims):
"""
Please refer to `_Evoelement.get_qobjevo` for documentation.
"""
mat = self.get_qobj(dims)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _concatenate_pulses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _concatenate_pulses(
self, pulse_instructions, scheduled_start_time, num_controls
):
"""
Concatenate compiled pulses coefficients and tlist for each pulse.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _is_pulses_valid
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _is_pulses_valid(self):
"""
Check if the pulses are in the correct shape.
Returns: bool
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generate_dependency_graph
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dependency_graph(self, commuting):
"""
Generate the instruction dependency graph.
It modifies the class attribute `nodes`, where each element (node)
is an `Instruction`.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if not isinstance(pulse, Drift) and pulse.label=="systematic_noise":
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Module level import not at top of file Open
from qiskit_aer import AerSimulator
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Place imports at the top of the file.
Always put imports at the top of the file, just after any module
comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants.
Okay: import os
Okay: # this is a comment\nimport os
Okay: '''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay: r'''this is a module docstring'''\nimport os
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nelse:\n\tpass\nimport y
Okay:
try:\n\timport x\nexcept ImportError:\n\tpass\nfinally:\n\tpass\nimport y
E402: a=1\nimport os
E402: 'One string'\n"Two string"\nimport os
E402: a=1\nfrom sys import x
Okay: if x:\n import os
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
pytest.param("step_func", id = "discrete"),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Missing whitespace around operator Open
tlist = abs(gate.arg_value) / (2 * g) / np.pi/ 2
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
pytest.param(SCQubits, {}, id = "SCQubits"),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
pytest.param(SCQubits, {}, id = "SCQubits"),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):