Showing 58 of 59 total issues
HTTPCodes
has 71 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class HTTPCodes {
/**
* HTTP OK.
*
* @returns {number} The HTTP status code 200.
Function exports
has 106 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (Ravel) {
/**
* Stores default configuration values, specified at parameter creation-time.
*
* @private
Function buildRoute
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function buildRoute (ravelInstance, routes, koaRouter, methodName, meta) {
const basePath = Metadata.getClassMetaValue(routes, '@role', 'name');
const fullPath = upath.toUnix(upath.posix.join(basePath, meta.path));
let verb;
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (Ravel) {
/**
* Recursively register `Module`s, `Resource`s and `Routes` with Ravel.
* Useful for [testing](#testing-ravel-applications).
*
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function buildRoute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function buildRoute (ravelInstance, routes, koaRouter, methodName, meta) {
const basePath = Metadata.getClassMetaValue(routes, '@role', 'name');
const fullPath = upath.toUnix(upath.posix.join(basePath, meta.path));
let verb;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (Ravel) {
/**
* Retrieve an initialized Ravel `Module` by its injection name, after `app.init()`.
* Useful for [testing](#testing-ravel-applications).
*
Function init
has 75 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async init () {
// application configuration is completed in constructor
await this.emit('pre init');
// log uncaught errors to prevent ES6 promise error swallowing
Function match
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
match (path, keyValues = {}) {
if (path.length === 0) {
if (this.middleware.length > 0) {
return new RouteTreeResult(keyValues, this.middleware, this.composedMiddleware);
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (Ravel) {
/**
* Stores default configuration values, specified at parameter creation-time.
*
* @private
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (ravelInstance, router) {
/**
* Retrieve the first registered Module which is decorated with `@authconfig`.
*
* @returns {object} The first `@authconfig` `Module`.
Function exports
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (Ravel) {
/**
* Recursively register `Module`s, `Resource`s and `Routes` with Ravel.
* Useful for [testing](#testing-ravel-applications).
*
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const Routes = function (basePath) {
if (typeof basePath !== 'string') {
throw new $err.IllegalValue(
'@Routes must be used with a basePath, as in @Routes(\'/route/base/path\')');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const Resource = function (basePath) {
if (typeof basePath !== 'string') {
throw new $err.IllegalValue(
'@Resource must be used with a basePath, as in @Resource(\'/route/base/path\')');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function cacheBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async cacheBody (ctx, key, metaKey, options) {
let body = ctx.response.body;
if ((ctx.request.method !== 'GET') || (ctx.response.status !== 200) || !body) {
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createClient
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createClient (ravelInstance, restrict = true) {
const localRedis = ravelInstance.get('redis port') === undefined || ravelInstance.get('redis host') === undefined;
ravelInstance.on('post init', () => {
ravelInstance.$log.info(localRedis
? 'Using in-memory key-value store. Please do not scale this app horizontally.'
Function autoinject
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const autoinject = function (...rest) {
return function (target) {
if (rest.length === 0) {
throw new $err.NotFound(`Empty @autoinject supplied on ${typeof target}`);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function initModule
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function initModule (ravelInstance) {
const self = this;
const name = Metadata.getClassMetaValue(Object.getPrototypeOf(self), '@role', 'name');
// run @postinject handlers
const postInjects = Metadata.getClassMeta(Object.getPrototypeOf(self), '@postinject', Object.create(null));
Function constructor
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor () {
super();
this[sUncaughtRejections] = 0;
this[sInitialized] = false;
Function middleware
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 30 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
middleware () {
const self = this;
return async function (ctx, next) {
let promise;
if (ctx.headers['x-auth-token'] && ctx.headers['x-auth-client']) {
Function containsFunctionalDuplicate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
containsFunctionalDuplicate (pathComponents, catchAll = false) {
if (pathComponents.length === 0) {
// if there's no path components to begin with, then this is only a
// duplicate if we've stored middleware at the "root" path (/)
// if we reached here via recursion, the same test works.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"