Showing 92 of 92 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (buckets[i][key].value) {
let sanitizedKey = key;
if (key.match(stripESSuffix)) {
sanitizedKey = key.toLowerCase().replace(stripESSuffix, '');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
keys.forEach((key) => {
let sanitizedKey = key;
if (key.match(stripESSuffix)) {
sanitizedKey = key.toLowerCase().replace(stripESSuffix, '');
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function serializeBucket
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static serializeBucket(key, buckets) {
let list = [];
let alias = key;
if (key.indexOf('geohash') >= 0) {
alias = 'geohash';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = (() => {
const loadAPI = (app, path, pathApi) => {
const routesFiles = fs.readdirSync(path);
let existIndexRouter = false;
Function convertDataToDownload
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
convertDataToDownload(data, type, first, more, cloneUrl) {
if (type === 'csv') {
if (data.data.length === 0) {
return '';
}
Function serializeBucket
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static serializeBucket(key, buckets) {
let list = [];
let alias = key;
if (key.indexOf('geohash') >= 0) {
alias = 'geohash';
Function findIntersect
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
findIntersect(node, finded, result) {
if (node && node.type === 'string' && node.value && finded) {
try {
logger.debug(node.value);
if (node.value.startsWith('\'')) {
Function continue
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async continue() {
if (this.resultScroll.aggregations) {
const data = Scroll.serialize(this.resultScroll, this.parsed, this.format);
this.stream.write(this.convertDataToDownload(data, this.format, true, false, this.cloneUrl), 'binary');
Function serializeBucket
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static serializeBucket(key, buckets) {
let list = [];
let alias = key;
if (key.indexOf('geohash') >= 0) {
alias = 'geohash';
Function loadAPI
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const loadAPI = (app, path, pathApi) => {
const routesFiles = fs.readdirSync(path);
let existIndexRouter = false;
routesFiles.forEach((file) => {
const newPath = path ? (`${path}/${file}`) : file;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (pathApi) {
app.use(mount(pathApi, require(newPath).middleware()));
} else {
app.use(require(newPath).middleware());
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function checkUserHasPermission
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const checkUserHasPermission = (user, dataset) => {
if (user && dataset) {
if (user.id === 'microservice') {
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkUserHasPermission
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const checkUserHasPermission = (user, dataset) => {
if (user && dataset) {
if (user.id === 'microservice') {
return true;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (pathApi) {
app.use(mount(pathApi, require(newPath).middleware()));
} else {
app.use(require(newPath).middleware());
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function formatAlias
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static formatAlias(el, parsedQuery) {
if (!parsedQuery || !el) {
return el;
}
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (mapping[node.value] && mapping[node.value].type === 'text') {
node.value = `${node.value}.keyword`;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function query
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async query(ctx) {
logger.info('Do Query with dataset', ctx.request.body);
logger.debug('Checking if is delete or select');
try {
Function formatAlias
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static formatAlias(el, parsedQuery) {
if (!parsedQuery || !el) {
return el;
}
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (mapping[node.value] && mapping[node.value].type === 'text') {
node.value = `${node.value}.keyword`;
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function checkPermissionDelete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const checkPermissionDelete = async (ctx, next) => {
if (ctx.state.parsed.delete) {
if (!ctx.request.body || !ctx.request.body.loggedUser) {
ctx.throw(403, 'Not authorized to execute DELETE query');
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"