While developers love to let their opinions be known about how code should be formatted, the style of your company’s codebase isn’t something that should be left to personal taste. Even veteran code readers will experience frustration trying to mentally translate semantically equivalent statements between styles. It certainly raises the barrier to entry for new members of your team to have to learn multiple styles in order to learn or contribute to a project. The maintainability of any codebase is closely tied to how easily it can be understood, so ambiguity in this area is not desirable.
Code that adheres to a consistent style is easier to peruse, quicker to update, unlikely to start unnecessary debates, and focuses attention where it’s necessary — on the functionality and meaning.
Fortunately, style conventions are simple to mechanically enforce. That’s right, ensuring style consistency is a task that can largely be offloaded to external automated services or libraries, meaning that it’s work you and your team won’t have to do!
Here’s how you do it:
1) Choose your linter
The first step in implementing your style guide is to pick a linter. Linters provide all the benefit of style consistency with none of the wasted discussion time. Even better, the ones developed for specific programming languages — like our many linting engines — have the conventions of the community encoded right into the tool. However, because these tools offer a broad range of functionality, getting them integrated into your development process can be something of an art. Which brings us to step 2,
2) Integrate the linter into your development process
While there are several ways to manually integrate a linter, they tend to be cumbersome and require considerable ongoing effort. Command line tools which take a variety of parameters are annoying in their own right. Ensuring that developers run a tool locally is almost as burdensome as stylistic discussions. An alternative to running these tools yourself (or convincing your team to use them) is to instead take advantage of a service like Code Climate — either our hosted service or our free CLI — that allows you to configure the automated analysis to your liking and be ensured that everyone is being held to the same standard.
3) Configure your external services
Once you settle on a tool to automate style review for your chosen language, you can configure an external service to keep your pull request up-to-date with the output of this analysis. This will be the start of a tight feedback loop that will keep your team kicking ass.
4) Incorporate into your code review
A good rule of thumb for understanding how to think about code style in terms of code review is the following: Can it be automated? If the change being suggested has been agreed upon by the team, and can be trivially handled by a style linter, it’s simply not worth discussing. Just add the requirement to your linter configuration and move along.
5) Enjoy more maintainable code and a happier team that doesn’t spend each day arguing about semi-colons
Adhering to a style guide results in code that’s quickly understood and easier to maintain, and happier developers who no longer feel nit-picked over their personal style preferences. Automating that function ensures those standards are enforced consistently, and that your code’s health will continue to improve over time. It’s a win-win. If you haven’t tried it yet, we highly recommend you give it a go!
Trending from Code Climate
1.
How to Navigate New Technology Expectations in Software Engineering Leadership
Rapid advancements in AI, No-Code/Low-Code, and SEI platforms are outpaced only by the evolving expectations they face. Learn how engineering leaders can take actionable steps to address new technology challenges.
2.
Mapping Engineering Goals to Business Outcomes
Understanding how engineering activities impact business objectives enables engineering leaders to make informed strategic decisions, keep teams aligned, advocate for resources, or communicate successes.
3.
Unlocking Efficiency: Optimizing Pull Request Reviews for Enterprise Engineering Teams
As engineering teams grow, so can the complexity of the code review process. From understanding industry benchmarks to improving alignment across teams, this article outlines strategies that large engineering organizations can use to optimize Review Cycles.
Get articles like this in your inbox.
Get more articles just like these delivered straight to your inbox
Stay up to date on the latest insights for data-driven engineering leaders.