Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Method update_request_status has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_request_status
    states = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = 0 }
    status = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = 0 }

    child_requests = miq_request_tasks
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_task.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method m_vm has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def m_vm(parent, xmlNode, _deletes)
    xmlNode.each_element do |e|
      self.guest_os = e.attributes["guestos"] if e.name == "guestos"
      self.config_version = e.attributes["version"] if e.name == "config"
      self.virtual_hw_version = e.attributes["version"] if e.name == "virtualhw"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/hardware.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_table has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_table(data, _db, options = {})
    data = data.to_a
    objs = data[0] && data[0].kind_of?(Integer) ? db_class.where(:id => data) : data.compact

    remove_loading_relations_for_virtual_custom_attributes
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/generator.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method server_role_names= has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def server_role_names=(roles)
    zone.lock do
      if roles.blank?
        server_roles.delete_all
      else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_server/role_management.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method available_formats_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.available_formats_for(column, suffix, datatype)
    is_break_sfx = (suffix && MiqReport.is_break_suffix?(suffix))
    formats.each_with_object({}) do |(format_name, properties), result|
      # Ignore formats that don't include suffix if the column name has a break suffix
      next if is_break_sfx && (properties[:suffixes].nil? || !properties[:suffixes].include?(suffix.to_sym))
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_report/formats.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method deliver_to_automate has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def deliver_to_automate(req_type = request_type, _zone = nil)
    args = {
      :object_type      => self.class.name,
      :object_id        => id,
      :namespace        => "Service/Provisioning/StateMachines",
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/service_template_provision_task.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate
    if self.options.kind_of?(Hash) && self.options.fetch_path(:notifications, :automate)
      event_name = self.options.fetch_path(:notifications, :automate, :event_name)
      unless (event_name =~ /[^a-z0-9_]/i).nil?
        errors.add("Event Name", "must be alphanumeric characters and underscores without spaces")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_alert.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method miq_server_proxies has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def miq_server_proxies
    case vendor
    when 'vmware'
      # VM cannot be scanned by server if they are on a repository
      return [] if storage_id.blank? || repository_vm?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method get_targets has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def get_targets
      if @options[:targets]
        @compute = Array.wrap(@options[:targets][:compute])
        @storage = Array.wrap(@options[:targets][:storage])
      elsif @options[:target_tags]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_analysis.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method set_or_default_field_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def set_or_default_field_values(values)
    field_names = values.keys
    fields do |fn, f, _dn, _d|
      if field_names.include?(fn)
        if f.key?(:values)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_request_workflow.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method fqusername has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def fqusername(username)
    return username if dn?(username) || domain_username?(username)

    user_type = @user_type.split("-").first
    return username if user_type != "mail" && upn?(username)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_ldap.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method normalize has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.normalize(rel_time, tz, mode = "beginning", is_date = nil)
    # time_spec =
    #   <value> <interval> Ago
    #   "Today"
    #   "Yesterday"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression/relative_datetime.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_document_header has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def build_document_header
          super
          type = c3_convert_type(mri.graph[:type].to_s)
          mri.chart = {
            :miqChart => type,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/reporting/formatter/c3.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build_performance_chart_area has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def build_performance_chart_area(maxcols)
          tz = mri.get_time_zone(Time.zone.name)

          mri.graph[:columns].each_with_index do |col, col_idx|
            next if col_idx >= maxcols
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/reporting/formatter/chart_common.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method yarn_audit has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.yarn_audit(format: "human")
    require "vmdb/inflections"
    Vmdb::Inflections.load_inflections

    require "vmdb/plugins"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/tasks/test_security_helper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.report_col_options
    {
      "cpu_cores_used_cost"   => {:grouping => [:total]},
      "cpu_cores_used_metric" => {:grouping => [:total]},
      "fixed_compute_metric"  => {:grouping => [:total]},
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/chargeback_container_project.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/chargeback_configured_system.rb on lines 52..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.report_col_options
    {
      "cpu_allocated_cost"      => {:grouping => [:total]},
      "cpu_allocated_metric"    => {:grouping => [:total]},
      "cpu_cost"                => {:grouping => [:total]},
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/chargeback_configured_system.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/chargeback_container_project.rb on lines 57..69

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 59.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      adds.each do |a|
        _log.info("Adding entry name: [#{a.name}] to #{options[:model]} name: #{t.name}")

        begin
          a.assign_entry_to(t)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 161..170

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.where_clause(records, options, region)
    scope = records.where(:resource_type => "ConfiguredSystem")
    if options[:tag] && (@report_user.nil? || !@report_user.self_service?)
      scope_with_current_tags = scope.where(:resource => ConfiguredSystem.find_tagged_with(:any => @options[:tag], :ns => '*'))
      scope.for_tag_names(Array(options[:tag]).flatten.map { |t| t.split("/")[2..-1] }).or(scope_with_current_tags)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/chargeback_configured_system.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/chargeback_vm.rb on lines 90..97

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      deletes.each do |d|
        _log.info("Removing entry name: [#{d.name}] from #{options[:model]} name: #{t.name}")

        begin
          d.remove_entry_from(t)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 173..182

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language