Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Method _search has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def _search(opts, seen = nil, &_blk)
    raw_opts = opts.dup
    opts[:scope] = scope(opts[:scope]) if opts[:scope]
    if opts[:filter]
      opts[:filter] = filter_construct(opts[:filter]) unless opts[:filter].kind_of?(Net::LDAP::Filter)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_ldap.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method _subst has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self._subst(rec, opts, tag, mode)
    ohash, ref = options2hash(opts, rec)

    case mode.downcase
    when "exist"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/condition.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method child_tags_over_time_period has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.child_tags_over_time_period(obj, interval_name, options = {})
    classifications = Classification.hash_all_by_type_and_name

    find_child_perf_for_time_period(obj, interval_name, options.merge(:conditions => "resource_type != 'VmOrTemplate' AND tag_names IS NOT NULL", :select => "resource_type, tag_names")).each_with_object({}) do |p, h|
      p.tag_names.split("|").each do |t|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_analysis.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method columns_for_distinct has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def columns_for_distinct(columns, orders) # :nodoc:
          order_columns = orders.reject(&:blank?).map do |s|
              # Convert Arel node to string
              unless s.is_a?(String)
                if s.kind_of?(Arel::Nodes::Ordering)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/extensions/ar_order.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method scope_targets has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def scope_targets(klass, scope, rbac_filters, user, miq_group)
      # Results are scoped by tenant if the TenancyMixin is included in the class,
      # with a few manual exceptions (User, Tenant). Note that the classes in
      # TENANT_ACCESS_STRATEGY are a consolidated list of them.
      if klass.respond_to?(:scope_by_tenant?) && klass.scope_by_tenant?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rbac/filterer.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method _to_human has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self._to_human(exp, options = {})
    return exp unless exp.kind_of?(Hash) || exp.kind_of?(Array)

    keys = exp.keys
    keys.delete(:token)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/miq_expression.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_service_resources(config_info, _auth_user = nil)
    if config_info[:configuration_script_id] && config_info[:configuration_script_id] != job_template.try(:id)
      service_resources.find_by(:resource_type => 'ConfigurationScriptBase').destroy
      self.job_template = ConfigurationScriptBase.find(config_info[:configuration_script_id])
    elsif config_info[:configuration] && config_info[:configuration] != job_template.try(:id)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/service_template_awx.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/service_template_ansible_tower.rb on lines 65..72

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def save_floating_ips_inventory(ems, hashes, target = nil)
    target = ems if target.nil?

    ems.floating_ips.reset
    deletes = if target == ems
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/ems_refresh/save_inventory_network.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/ems_refresh/save_inventory_network.rb on lines 128..149

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def save_network_routers_inventory(ems, hashes, target = nil)
    target = ems if target.nil?

    ems.network_routers.reset
    deletes = if target == ems
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/ems_refresh/save_inventory_network.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/ems_refresh/save_inventory_network.rb on lines 86..102

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_service_resources(config_info, _auth_user = nil)
    if config_info[:configuration_script_id] && config_info[:configuration_script_id] != job_template.try(:id)
      service_resources.find_by(:resource_type => 'ConfigurationScriptBase').destroy
      self.job_template = ConfigurationScriptBase.find(config_info[:configuration_script_id])
    elsif config_info[:configuration] && config_info[:configuration] != job_template.try(:id)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/service_template_ansible_tower.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/service_template_awx.rb on lines 65..72

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 54.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if %i[host domain project].any? { |opt| attrs.has_key? opt }
      attrs[:options]         ||= {}
      attrs[:options][:host]    = attrs.delete(:host)    if attrs.key?(:host)
      attrs[:options][:domain]  = attrs.delete(:domain)  if attrs.key?(:domain)
      attrs[:options][:project] = attrs.delete(:project) if attrs.key?(:project)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/azure_credential.rb on lines 75..79

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if %i[client tenant subscription].any? { |opt| attrs.has_key? opt }
      attrs[:options]              ||= {}
      attrs[:options][:client]       = attrs.delete(:client)       if attrs.key?(:client)
      attrs[:options][:tenant]       = attrs.delete(:tenant)       if attrs.key?(:tenant)
      attrs[:options][:subscription] = attrs.delete(:subscription) if attrs.key?(:subscription)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/azure_credential.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 70..74

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 53.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      conn_options = {
        :dbname => options[:database],
        :host   => options[:pg_host],
        :port   => options[:port]
      }
Severity: Major
Found in tools/pg_inspector/active_connections_to_yaml.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
tools/pg_inspector/servers_to_yaml.rb on lines 51..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def after_ae_delivery(ae_result)
    _log.info("ae_result=#{ae_result.inspect}")
    reload

    return if ae_result == 'retry'
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/miq_retire_task.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/service_template_provision_task.rb on lines 198..209

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def after_ae_delivery(ae_result)
    _log.info("ae_result=#{ae_result.inspect}")
    reload

    return if ae_result == 'retry'
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/service_template_provision_task.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/miq_retire_task.rb on lines 46..57

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      conn_options = {
        :dbname => options[:database],
        :host   => options[:pg_host],
        :port   => options[:port]
      }
Severity: Major
Found in tools/pg_inspector/servers_to_yaml.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
tools/pg_inspector/active_connections_to_yaml.rb on lines 68..81

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 52.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if rec.nil?
          _log.info("Creating [#{currency[:code]}] with symbols=[#{currency[:symbol]}]")
          Currency.create(currency)
        elsif fixture_mtime_currency > rec.created_at
          rec.attributes = currency
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/currency.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/chargeback_rate_detail_currency.rb on lines 53..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if rec.nil?
          _log.info("Creating [#{currency[:code]}] with symbols=[#{currency[:symbol]}]")
          ChargebackRateDetailCurrency.create!(currency)
        elsif fixture_mtime_currency > rec.created_at
          rec.attributes = currency
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/chargeback_rate_detail_currency.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/currency.rb on lines 44..53

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 51.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method sync_windows_images has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def sync_windows_images
    return if windows_images_directory.nil?

    _log.info("Synchronizing Windows images on PXE Server [#{name}]...")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/pxe_server.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method sync_workers has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def sync_workers
      ws      = find_current_or_starting
      current = ws.collect(&:queue_name).sort
      desired = has_required_role? ? desired_queue_names.sort : []
      result  = {:adds => [], :deletes => []}
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/per_ems_worker_mixin.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language