Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,311 of 1,311 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Exports
    class AlertSets
      def export(options = {})
        export_dir = options[:directory]
Severity: Major
Found in lib/task_helpers/exports/alert_sets.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/task_helpers/exports/alerts.rb on lines 2..11

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 48.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def allow_retire_request_creation?
    MiqRequest.with_type("OrchestrationStackRetireRequest").where(:approval_state => "pending_approval").find_each do |request|
      if request.options.try(:[], :src_ids)&.include?(id)
        next if request.request_state == "finished" || request.status == "Error"
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/orchestration_stack.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/service.rb on lines 173..183

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 48.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method has too many optional parameters. [11/3]
Open

  def initialize(
    auto_placement_visibility_service = AutoPlacementVisibilityService.new,
    number_of_vms_visibility_service = NumberOfVmsVisibilityService.new,
    service_template_fields_visibility_service = ServiceTemplateFieldsVisibilityService.new,
    network_visibility_service = NetworkVisibilityService.new,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/services/dialog_field_visibility_service.rb by rubocop

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def index_bloat
    data = select(<<-SQL, "Index Bloat")
                SELECT   tablename                                         AS table_name
                       , iname                                             AS index_name
                       , ituples::bigint                                   AS rows
Severity: Major
Found in lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 43..130
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 236..384

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 47.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def table_bloat
    data = select(<<-SQL, "Table Bloat")
                SELECT tablename                                                    AS table_name
                     , reltuples::bigint                                            AS rows
                     , relpages::bigint                                             AS pages
Severity: Major
Found in lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 140..225
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 236..384

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 47.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def database_bloat
    data = select(<<-SQL, "Database Bloat")
              SELECT   tablename                                         AS table_name
                     , ' '                                               AS index_name
                     , reltuples::bigint                                 AS rows
Severity: Major
Found in lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 43..130
lib/extensions/ar_adapter/ar_dba.rb on lines 140..225

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 47.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def disconnect_ems(e = nil)
    if e.nil? || ext_management_system == e
      log_text = " from EMS [#{ext_management_system.name}] id [#{ext_management_system.id}]" unless ext_management_system.nil?
      _log.info("Disconnecting Host [#{name}] id [#{id}]#{log_text}")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/host.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/vm_or_template.rb on lines 710..719

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def load_transitions
    self.state ||= 'initialize'

    {
      :initializing => {'initialize'       => 'waiting_to_start'},
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_runner_workflow.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/ems_refresh_workflow.rb on lines 71..84

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def disconnect_ems(e = nil)
    if e.nil? || ext_management_system == e
      log_text = " from EMS [#{ext_management_system.name}] id [#{ext_management_system.id}]" unless ext_management_system.nil?
      _log.info("Disconnecting Vm [#{name}] id [#{id}]#{log_text}")
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_or_template.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/host.rb on lines 509..518

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def load_transitions
    self.state ||= 'initialize'

    {
      :initializing     => {'initialize'       => 'waiting_to_start'},
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/ems_refresh_workflow.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_runner_workflow.rb on lines 98..111

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method request_limits has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.request_limits(options)
    # Memory values are in megabytes
    default_max_vm_memory = 255.gigabyte / 1.megabyte
    result = {
      :min__number_of_sockets => 1,
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_reconfigure_request.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method check_policy_complete has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def check_policy_complete(from_zone, status, message, result)
    unless status == 'ok'
      _log.error("Status = #{status}, message = #{message}")
      signal(:abort, message, "error")
      return
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_scan.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retire has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def retire(options = {})
    return unless options.keys.any? { |key| [:date, :warn].include?(key) }

    message = "#{retirement_object_title}: [id:<#{id}>, name:<#{name}>]"
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/mixins/retirement_mixin.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method get_sub_key_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.get_sub_key_values(rec, sub_key)
    unless sub_key.include?(".")
      return [] unless rec.respond_to?(sub_key)

      return rec.send(sub_key).downcase
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_bulk_import.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method safe_log has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.safe_log(worker, message = nil, exit_code = 0)
    meth = (exit_code == 0) ? :info : :error

    prefix = "#{log_prefix} "      rescue ""
    pid    = "PID [#{Process.pid}] "    rescue ""
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_worker/runner.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method select_from_order_columns has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def select_from_order_columns(columns)
      columns.compact.map do |column|
        if column.kind_of?(Arel::Nodes::Ordering)
          column.expr
        else
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rbac/filterer.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = [
    {
      :component  => 'text-field',
      :label      => N_('Username'),
      :helperText => N_('The username to use to connect to OpenStack'),
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb and 3 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 2..22
app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 2..22

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method update_custom_spec has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_custom_spec
    vm = get_source_vm
    return if vm.nil?

    if @customize_option.nil?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/miq_provision_virt_workflow.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method apply has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def apply
    @verified_data.each do |id, data|
      vm = VmOrTemplate.find_by(:id => id)
      if vm
        data.each do |category, entries|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification_import.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method log_server_identity has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.log_server_identity
      return unless MiqEnvironment::Command.is_appliance?

      # this is the request to overwrite a small file in the vmdb/log directory for each time the evm server is restarted.
      # the file must not be named ".log" or it will be removed by logrotate, and it must contain the Server GUID (by which the appliance is known in the vmdb,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/vmdb/appliance.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language